Players

Chris Whisman 5 Outside Hitter (OH)
Player Skills
SERVING	RECEIVING	BLOCKING	ATTACKING	DEFENSE	SETTING
15	14	16	16	16	10

Season 11 Totals
KILLS	ATK PCT	ACES	DIGS	BLOCKS
401 2nd	.543 28th	29 50th	79 110th	80 28th

Match Statistics - OFFENSE (Season 11)

Match		Sets	Attack					Serve						Set
m	opponent/sets	sp	k	k/s	e	ta	pct	pts	sa	se	sa/s	ta	pct	a	a/s	ta	pct	pts	rating
1	Pekin W (3–0 sets)	3	19	6.33	0	23	.826	7	0	1	0.00	11	.909	.	.	.	.	20.0	9.39
2	Ames W (3–0 sets)	3	9	3.00	5	21	.190	6	0	2	0.00	11	.818	1	0.33	1	1.000	11.5	6.54
4	Dallas L (2–3 sets)	5	17	3.40	4	25	.520	9	4	2	0.80	18	.889	.	.	.	.	23.5	6.78
5	Columbia W (3–2 sets)	5	11	2.20	3	16	.500	4	2	1	0.40	13	.923	2	0.40	4	.500	14.0	2.63
7	Arlington W (3–0 sets)	3	19	6.33	1	28	.643	8	2	0	0.67	14	1.000	.	.	.	.	22.0	8.76
8	Quincy W (3–0 sets)	3	9	3.00	0	15	.600	5	0	1	0.00	8	.875	.	.	.	.	9.5	6.62
10	Pekin W (3–0 sets)	3	10	3.33	2	18	.444	11	3	3	1.00	17	.824	.	.	.	.	14.5	7.06
11	Ames W (3–0 sets)	3	11	3.67	0	13	.846	6	1	3	0.33	10	.700	.	.	.	.	13.5	7.35
13	Dallas W (3–1 sets)	4	19	4.75	2	27	.630	1	0	1	0.00	8	.875	.	.	.	.	19.5	7.05
14	St. Charles W (3–2 sets)	5	14	2.80	5	23	.391	3	1	3	0.20	12	.750	0	0.00	1	.000	16.5	5.80
18	Spokane W (3–2 sets)	5	20	4.00	3	28	.607	5	1	1	0.20	17	.941	.	.	.	.	24.0	7.67
19	Ames W (3–1 sets)	4	13	3.25	1	18	.667	11	3	1	0.75	19	.947	.	.	.	.	17.0	7.16
22	Pekin W (3–0 sets)	3	15	5.00	0	18	.833	6	0	0	0.00	12	1.000	.	.	.	.	15.5	7.49
23	Quincy W (3–1 sets)	4	16	4.00	3	20	.650	11	1	1	0.25	19	.947	.	.	.	.	20.5	8.69
26	Starkville L (1–3 sets)	4	15	3.75	6	25	.360	5	1	2	0.25	16	.875	.	.	.	.	16.0	6.96
27	Columbia W (3–0 sets)	3	8	2.67	2	13	.462	3	2	4	0.67	11	.636	.	.	.	.	12.5	6.44
29	Arlington W (3–0 sets)	3	9	3.00	1	14	.571	3	0	1	0.00	8	.875	0	0.00	1	.000	10.5	7.19
30	Carlsbad W (3–0 sets)	3	16	5.33	2	20	.700	3	0	1	0.00	10	.900	.	.	.	.	17.0	8.44
32	Mat-Su W (3–1 sets)	4	12	3.00	0	15	.800	4	1	1	0.25	12	.917	.	.	.	.	14.0	5.58
34	Quincy W (3–1 sets)	4	16	4.00	3	25	.520	1	0	2	0.00	10	.800	1	0.25	1	1.000	18.0	6.31
35	Mat-Su W (3–1 sets)	4	9	2.25	3	20	.300	3	1	0	0.25	11	1.000	.	.	.	.	11.0	5.33
37	Teutopolis W (3–1 sets)	4	14	3.50	3	18	.611	8	1	3	0.25	17	.824	.	.	.	.	16.0	7.18
39	Columbia L (0–3 sets)	3	8	2.67	4	16	.250	1	0	3	0.00	8	.625	1	0.33	1	1.000	9.0	6.16
40	Alton W (3–2 sets)	5	27	5.40	7	37	.541	7	2	1	0.40	18	.944	2	0.40	2	1.000	30.5	8.22
42	Columbia W (3–1 sets)	4	11	2.75	1	14	.714	2	1	3	0.25	12	.750	.	.	.	.	14.5	4.75
44	St. Charles W (3–2 sets)	5	16	3.20	6	29	.345	3	1	2	0.20	12	.833	.	.	.	.	17.5	5.19
45	Cincinnati L (1–3 sets)	4	17	4.25	7	29	.345	4	0	1	0.00	14	.929	0	0.00	1	.000	19.5	7.05
47	Sheboygan W (3–1 sets)	4	21	5.25	2	30	.633	4	1	0	0.25	13	1.000	.	.	.	.	23.5	8.23
Total		107	401	3.75	76	598	.543	144	29	44	0.27	361	.878	7	0.07	12	.583	471.0	6.86

Match Statistics - DEFENSE (Season 11)

Match		Sets	Block					Dig		Receive
m	opponent/sets	sp	s	a	t	be	blk/s	d	d/s	3	rt	rcv	e	pct	pts	rating
1	Pekin W (3–0 sets)	3	0	2	2	0	0.67	7	2.33	3	2.33	6	0	1.000	20.0	9.39
2	Ames W (3–0 sets)	3	0	5	5	0	1.67	5	1.67	3	1.88	8	0	1.000	11.5	6.54
4	Dallas L (2–3 sets)	5	0	5	5	0	1.00	1	0.20	14	2.11	38	1	.974	23.5	6.78
5	Columbia W (3–2 sets)	5	0	2	2	0	0.40	1	0.20	14	1.51	39	13	.667	14.0	2.63
7	Arlington W (3–0 sets)	3	0	2	2	0	0.67	3	1.00	10	2.21	19	1	.947	22.0	8.76
8	Quincy W (3–0 sets)	3	0	1	1	1	0.33	2	0.67	5	2.29	7	1	.857	9.5	6.62
10	Pekin W (3–0 sets)	3	0	3	3	0	1.00	.	.	13	2.11	27	2	.926	14.5	7.06
11	Ames W (3–0 sets)	3	0	3	3	0	1.00	1	0.33	3	2.11	9	0	1.000	13.5	7.35
13	Dallas W (3–1 sets)	4	0	1	1	0	0.25	4	1.00	16	2.07	30	4	.867	19.5	7.05
14	St. Charles W (3–2 sets)	5	0	3	3	0	0.60	4	0.80	21	2.22	41	3	.927	16.5	5.80
18	Spokane W (3–2 sets)	5	0	6	6	0	1.20	5	1.00	20	2.12	41	4	.902	24.0	7.67
19	Ames W (3–1 sets)	4	0	2	2	0	0.50	1	0.25	15	2.28	25	2	.920	17.0	7.16
22	Pekin W (3–0 sets)	3	0	1	1	0	0.33	3	1.00	12	1.96	23	5	.783	15.5	7.49
23	Quincy W (3–1 sets)	4	0	7	7	0	1.75	3	0.75	14	2.23	26	2	.923	20.5	8.69
26	Starkville L (1–3 sets)	4	.	.	.	.	.	6	1.50	9	2.17	18	2	.889	16.0	6.96
27	Columbia W (3–0 sets)	3	1	3	4	0	1.33	.	.	11	2.43	23	0	1.000	12.5	6.44
29	Arlington W (3–0 sets)	3	0	3	3	0	1.00	5	1.67	8	2.33	15	1	.933	10.5	7.19
30	Carlsbad W (3–0 sets)	3	0	2	2	1	0.67	4	1.33	9	2.16	19	2	.895	17.0	8.44
32	Mat-Su W (3–1 sets)	4	0	2	2	0	0.50	2	0.50	16	2.06	31	4	.871	14.0	5.58
34	Quincy W (3–1 sets)	4	0	4	4	0	1.00	.	.	16	1.94	36	5	.861	18.0	6.31
35	Mat-Su W (3–1 sets)	4	0	2	2	0	0.50	6	1.50	15	2.27	30	2	.933	11.0	5.33
37	Teutopolis W (3–1 sets)	4	0	2	2	0	0.50	1	0.25	25	2.32	41	5	.878	16.0	7.18
39	Columbia L (0–3 sets)	3	0	2	2	0	0.67	3	1.00	15	2.42	24	2	.917	9.0	6.16
40	Alton W (3–2 sets)	5	1	1	2	0	0.40	5	1.00	15	2.16	31	1	.968	30.5	8.22
42	Columbia W (3–1 sets)	4	0	5	5	0	1.25	1	0.25	12	1.90	30	4	.867	14.5	4.75
44	St. Charles W (3–2 sets)	5	0	1	1	0	0.20	1	0.20	12	2.00	31	3	.903	17.5	5.19
45	Cincinnati L (1–3 sets)	4	0	5	5	0	1.25	2	0.50	14	1.97	31	6	.806	19.5	7.05
47	Sheboygan W (3–1 sets)	4	0	3	3	0	0.75	3	0.75	17	2.18	33	2	.939	23.5	8.23
Total		107	2	78	80	2	0.75	79	0.74	357	2.11	732	77	.895	471.0	6.86