Players

Chris Whisman 5 Outside Hitter (OH)
Player Skills
SERVING	RECEIVING	BLOCKING	ATTACKING	DEFENSE	SETTING
15	14	16	16	16	10

Match		Sets	Attack					Serve						Set
m	opponent/sets	sp	k	k/s	e	ta	pct	pts	sa	se	sa/s	ta	pct	a	a/s	ta	pct	pts	rating
1	St. Charles W (3–1 sets)	4	10	2.50	1	17	.529	12	2	1	0.50	22	.955	.	.	.	.	13.5	6.45
2	Dallas W (3–2 sets)	5	17	3.40	7	29	.345	15	3	2	0.60	30	.933	.	.	.	.	21.0	7.23
3	Cincinnati W (3–0 sets)	3	13	4.33	0	14	.929	10	0	4	0.00	17	.765	1	0.33	1	1.000	15.0	10.00
5	Quincy L (1–3 sets)	4	9	2.25	2	20	.350	3	0	0	0.00	12	1.000	.	.	.	.	10.5	5.11
6	Antioch L (0–3 sets)	3	10	3.33	5	21	.238	1	0	2	0.00	9	.778	0	0.00	1	.000	10.0	6.33
8	Columbia L (0–3 sets)	3	10	3.33	3	18	.389	5	0	1	0.00	14	.929	.	.	.	.	12.5	7.35
9	San Jose L (0–3 sets)	3	13	4.33	2	18	.611	2	1	2	0.33	11	.818	.	.	.	.	14.0	6.70
11	Dallas W (3–2 sets)	5	10	2.00	5	25	.200	10	1	3	0.20	19	.842	.	.	.	.	13.5	4.66
12	Denali L (0–3 sets)	3	15	5.00	4	23	.478	4	2	2	0.67	11	.818	.	.	.	.	17.5	7.03
14	Pekin L (0–3 sets)	3	7	2.33	1	10	.600	2	0	1	0.00	9	.889	.	.	.	.	7.0	4.41
15	Cincinnati L (1–3 sets)	4	12	3.00	3	19	.474	8	2	2	0.50	17	.882	0	0.00	1	.000	15.0	6.99
17	San Jose W (3–1 sets)	4	18	4.50	1	23	.739	4	2	1	0.50	13	.923	.	.	.	.	23.5	8.72
19	Arlington L (0–3 sets)	3	6	2.00	1	12	.417	2	0	0	0.00	9	1.000	.	.	.	.	7.5	3.64
22	Mendon L (1–3 sets)	4	10	2.50	6	20	.200	8	2	1	0.50	20	.950	.	.	.	.	13.5	6.24
26	Nashville L (0–3 sets)	3	8	2.67	4	21	.190	5	0	1	0.00	13	.923	0	0.00	2	.000	8.0	5.69
29	Arlington W (3–2 sets)	5	19	3.80	1	24	.750	7	1	2	0.20	24	.917	.	.	.	.	20.0	6.20
33	New Orleans L (0–3 sets)	3	8	2.67	3	15	.333	1	0	0	0.00	8	1.000	.	.	.	.	9.0	4.16
34	Columbia W (3–0 sets)	3	9	3.00	0	10	.900	12	4	2	1.33	20	.900	.	.	.	.	13.0	7.60
39	Quincy W (3–2 sets)	5	21	4.20	5	28	.571	11	3	2	0.60	25	.920	0	0.00	1	.000	25.5	8.17
44	Pekin W (3–0 sets)	3	10	3.33	4	16	.375	5	0	1	0.00	14	.929	.	.	.	.	10.0	5.16
Total		73	235	3.22	58	383	.462	127	23	30	0.32	317	.905	1	0.01	6	.167	279.5	6.39

Match		Sets	Block					Dig		Receive
m	opponent/sets	sp	s	a	t	be	blk/s	d	d/s	3	rt	rcv	e	pct	pts	rating
1	St. Charles W (3–1 sets)	4	0	3	3	0	0.75	7	1.75	12	2.14	22	2	.909	13.5	6.45
2	Dallas W (3–2 sets)	5	0	2	2	0	0.40	4	0.80	17	2.26	35	2	.943	21.0	7.23
3	Cincinnati W (3–0 sets)	3	0	4	4	0	1.33	8	2.67	10	2.50	14	1	.929	15.0	10.00
5	Quincy L (1–3 sets)	4	0	3	3	1	0.75	8	2.00	12	2.00	27	3	.889	10.5	5.11
6	Antioch L (0–3 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	4	1.33	15	2.32	25	0	1.000	10.0	6.33
8	Columbia L (0–3 sets)	3	0	5	5	0	1.67	3	1.00	12	2.08	25	2	.920	12.5	7.35
9	San Jose L (0–3 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	4	1.33	8	2.00	21	2	.905	14.0	6.70
11	Dallas W (3–2 sets)	5	0	5	5	0	1.00	3	0.60	10	2.15	20	0	1.000	13.5	4.66
12	Denali L (0–3 sets)	3	0	1	1	0	0.33	1	0.33	9	1.92	25	2	.920	17.5	7.03
14	Pekin L (0–3 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	5	1.67	11	2.08	24	2	.917	7.0	4.41
15	Cincinnati L (1–3 sets)	4	0	2	2	0	0.50	7	1.75	15	2.19	31	3	.903	15.0	6.99
17	San Jose W (3–1 sets)	4	0	7	7	0	1.75	8	2.00	10	2.16	19	1	.947	23.5	8.72
19	Arlington L (0–3 sets)	3	0	3	3	0	1.00	4	1.33	10	1.90	30	3	.900	7.5	3.64
22	Mendon L (1–3 sets)	4	0	3	3	0	0.75	3	0.75	17	2.29	28	3	.893	13.5	6.24
26	Nashville L (0–3 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	4	1.33	12	2.08	26	2	.923	8.0	5.69
29	Arlington W (3–2 sets)	5	.	.	.	.	.	4	0.80	15	1.97	36	5	.861	20.0	6.20
33	New Orleans L (0–3 sets)	3	0	2	2	0	0.67	3	1.00	8	1.70	27	5	.815	9.0	4.16
34	Columbia W (3–0 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	4	1.33	11	2.60	15	0	1.000	13.0	7.60
39	Quincy W (3–2 sets)	5	1	1	2	1	0.40	4	0.80	18	2.38	24	3	.875	25.5	8.17
44	Pekin W (3–0 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	2	0.67	8	1.81	21	3	.857	10.0	5.16
Total		73	1	41	42	2	0.58	90	1.23	240	2.11	495	44	.911	279.5	6.39