Players

Match		Sets	Attack					Serve						Set
m	opponent/sets	sp	k	k/s	e	ta	pct	pts	sa	se	sa/s	ta	pct	a	a/s	ta	pct	pts	rating
1	Mendon W (3–2 sets)	5	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	5	1.00	11	.455	0.0	5.85
2	Burlington W (3–2 sets)	5	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	5	1.00	7	.714	0.0	5.40
4	Sheboygan L (1–3 sets)	4	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	6	1.50	12	.500	0.0	4.61
5	Spokane L (1–3 sets)	4	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	4	1.00	9	.444	0.0	6.98
8	Cincinnati L (2–3 sets)	5	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	3	0.60	6	.500	0.0	2.60
9	Kentucky W (3–0 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	4	1	1	0.33	11	.909	6	2.00	8	.750	1.0	10.00
11	Burlington W (3–0 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	2	0.67	4	.500	0.0	8.23
12	Santa Clara L (2–3 sets)	5	.	.	.	.	.	4	1	3	0.20	16	.813	3	0.60	4	.750	1.0	6.90
13	Sheboygan L (1–3 sets)	4	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	2	0.50	3	.667	0.0	5.25
14	Schenectady W (3–0 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	1	0.33	1	1.000	0.0	4.52
18	Ames W (3–0 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	10	0	1	0.00	15	.933	4	1.33	6	.667	0.0	7.34
19	Mendon W (3–0 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	3	1.00	5	.600	0.0	5.40
22	San Jose W (3–1 sets)	4	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	4	1.00	6	.667	0.0	3.15
23	Sheboygan L (2–3 sets)	5	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	2	0.40	4	.500	0.0	4.30
30	Santa Clara W (3–0 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	2	0.67	2	1.000	0.0	6.43
33	Kentucky W (3–0 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	3	1.00	4	.750	0.0	7.65
35	Nashville W (3–0 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	5	1.67	8	.625	0.0	5.53
38	Pekin W (3–1 sets)	4	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	4	1.00	6	.667	0.0	5.40
40	Portland L (2–3 sets)	5	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	4	0.80	8	.500	0.0	4.45
43	Antioch L (0–3 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	2	0.67	5	.400	0.0	3.50
44	Schenectady L (1–3 sets)	4	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	1	0.25	3	.333	0.0	3.35
45	Teutopolis W (3–1 sets)	4	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	5	1.25	5	1.000	0.0	5.45
Total		85	.	.	.	.	.	18	2	5	0.02	42	.881	76	0.89	127	.598	2.0	5.56

Match		Sets	Block					Dig		Receive
m	opponent/sets	sp	s	a	t	be	blk/s	d	d/s	3	rt	rcv	e	pct	pts	rating
1	Mendon W (3–2 sets)	5	.	.	.	.	.	9	1.80	16	2.13	38	3	.921	0.0	5.85
2	Burlington W (3–2 sets)	5	.	.	.	.	.	9	1.80	11	1.96	25	3	.880	0.0	5.40
4	Sheboygan L (1–3 sets)	4	.	.	.	.	.	3	0.75	14	2.38	21	1	.952	0.0	4.61
5	Spokane L (1–3 sets)	4	.	.	.	.	.	8	2.00	15	2.40	25	1	.960	0.0	6.98
8	Cincinnati L (2–3 sets)	5	.	.	.	.	.	2	0.40	14	1.82	38	8	.789	0.0	2.60
9	Kentucky W (3–0 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	13	4.33	8	2.54	13	0	1.000	1.0	10.00
11	Burlington W (3–0 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	6	2.00	16	2.71	21	0	1.000	0.0	8.23
12	Santa Clara L (2–3 sets)	5	.	.	.	.	.	10	2.00	20	2.36	33	3	.909	1.0	6.90
13	Sheboygan L (1–3 sets)	4	.	.	.	.	.	7	1.75	16	2.23	30	1	.967	0.0	5.25
14	Schenectady W (3–0 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	3	1.00	20	2.33	33	1	.970	0.0	4.52
18	Ames W (3–0 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	4	1.33	9	2.50	14	1	.929	0.0	7.34
19	Mendon W (3–0 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	6	2.00	6	2.06	16	1	.938	0.0	5.40
22	San Jose W (3–1 sets)	4	.	.	.	.	.	2	0.50	17	1.97	34	7	.794	0.0	3.15
23	Sheboygan L (2–3 sets)	5	.	.	.	.	.	7	1.40	13	2.00	33	2	.939	0.0	4.30
30	Santa Clara W (3–0 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	3	1.00	12	2.69	16	0	1.000	0.0	6.43
33	Kentucky W (3–0 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	6	2.00	12	2.50	20	0	1.000	0.0	7.65
35	Nashville W (3–0 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	6	2.00	6	2.00	15	1	.933	0.0	5.53
38	Pekin W (3–1 sets)	4	.	.	.	.	.	7	1.75	21	2.10	40	5	.875	0.0	5.40
40	Portland L (2–3 sets)	5	.	.	.	.	.	5	1.00	20	2.31	36	4	.889	0.0	4.45
43	Antioch L (0–3 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	2	0.67	9	2.10	20	0	1.000	0.0	3.50
44	Schenectady L (1–3 sets)	4	.	.	.	.	.	1	0.25	20	2.08	38	4	.895	0.0	3.35
45	Teutopolis W (3–1 sets)	4	.	.	.	.	.	7	1.75	16	2.13	30	4	.867	0.0	5.45
Total		85	.	.	.	.	.	126	1.48	311	2.20	589	50	.915	2.0	5.56