Players

Leopoldo Morales 5 Right Side (RS)
Player Skills
SERVING	RECEIVING	BLOCKING	ATTACKING	DEFENSE	SETTING
12	-	13	12	12	-

Match		Sets	Attack					Serve						Set
m	opponent/sets	sp	k	k/s	e	ta	pct	pts	sa	se	sa/s	ta	pct	a	a/s	ta	pct	pts	rating
4	Columbia L (0–3 sets)	3	6	2.00	2	14	.286	0	0	3	0.00	7	.571	.	.	.	.	6.0	4.27
5	Dallas W (3–1 sets)	4	10	2.50	1	18	.500	6	1	0	0.25	16	1.000	.	.	.	.	13.5	8.25
7	Arlington W (3–0 sets)	3	3	1.00	4	12	-.083	7	0	1	0.00	13	.923	.	.	.	.	5.0	7.30
8	Ames L (1–3 sets)	4	3	0.75	3	13	.000	4	0	1	0.00	15	.933	.	.	.	.	4.5	5.04
10	Quincy W (3–0 sets)	3	8	2.67	2	16	.375	5	0	2	0.00	10	.800	.	.	.	.	8.5	6.59
11	Portland L (0–3 sets)	3	2	0.67	4	7	-.286	3	0	3	0.00	9	.667	.	.	.	.	4.0	5.58
13	Columbia W (3–1 sets)	4	6	1.50	5	18	.056	7	1	1	0.25	14	.929	.	.	.	.	8.5	6.53
14	Pekin L (0–3 sets)	3	4	1.33	1	9	.333	0	0	1	0.00	7	.857	.	.	.	.	6.0	4.66
17	Denali W (3–0 sets)	3	2	0.67	2	8	.000	2	0	2	0.00	8	.750	.	.	.	.	4.0	7.12
19	Dallas W (3–0 sets)	3	3	1.00	1	8	.250	7	0	1	0.00	13	.923	.	.	.	.	4.5	7.37
22	Carlsbad W (3–2 sets)	5	3	0.60	1	8	.250	7	2	0	0.40	18	1.000	.	.	.	.	9.0	6.76
23	Pekin L (0–3 sets)	3	2	0.67	2	10	.000	0	0	2	0.00	7	.714	.	.	.	.	2.0	2.42
25	San Jose L (0–3 sets)	3	2	0.67	4	8	-.250	2	0	3	0.00	9	.667	.	.	.	.	4.0	5.02
26	Baton Rouge W (3–0 sets)	3	4	1.33	2	13	.154	2	0	2	0.00	7	.714	.	.	.	.	5.5	6.78
30	Sheboygan W (3–2 sets)	5	7	1.40	1	16	.375	5	0	2	0.00	14	.857	.	.	.	.	11.0	6.70
33	Portland W (3–2 sets)	5	2	0.40	2	8	.000	3	0	4	0.00	15	.733	.	.	.	.	3.0	3.92
35	Teutopolis W (3–1 sets)	4	1	0.25	1	6	.000	11	1	2	0.25	18	.889	.	.	.	.	3.5	5.73
38	Alton L (0–3 sets)	3	2	0.67	3	8	-.125	5	1	2	0.33	13	.846	.	.	.	.	3.0	4.24
39	Dallas W (3–2 sets)	5	6	1.20	3	13	.231	4	0	3	0.00	14	.786	.	.	.	.	9.5	6.52
40	Alton L (1–3 sets)	4	1	0.25	1	8	.000	0	0	3	0.00	8	.625	.	.	.	.	1.0	1.92
44	Pekin W (3–1 sets)	4	2	0.50	2	8	.000	5	1	2	0.25	14	.857	.	.	.	.	4.0	4.20
45	Portland W (3–2 sets)	5	5	1.00	4	12	.083	2	0	4	0.00	13	.692	.	.	.	.	7.0	3.86
Total		82	84	1.02	51	241	.137	87	7	44	0.09	262	.832	.	.	.	.	127.0	5.49

Match		Sets	Block					Dig		Receive
m	opponent/sets	sp	s	a	t	be	blk/s	d	d/s	3	rt	rcv	e	pct	pts	rating
4	Columbia L (0–3 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	6	2.00	.	.	.	.	.	6.0	4.27
5	Dallas W (3–1 sets)	4	1	3	4	0	1.00	6	1.50	.	.	.	.	.	13.5	8.25
7	Arlington W (3–0 sets)	3	0	4	4	0	1.33	3	1.00	.	.	.	.	.	5.0	7.30
8	Ames L (1–3 sets)	4	0	3	3	2	0.75	2	0.50	.	.	.	.	.	4.5	5.04
10	Quincy W (3–0 sets)	3	0	1	1	0	0.33	4	1.33	.	.	.	.	.	8.5	6.59
11	Portland L (0–3 sets)	3	1	2	3	0	1.00	2	0.67	.	.	.	.	.	4.0	5.58
13	Columbia W (3–1 sets)	4	0	3	3	0	0.75	4	1.00	.	.	.	.	.	8.5	6.53
14	Pekin L (0–3 sets)	3	2	0	2	1	0.67	2	0.67	.	.	.	.	.	6.0	4.66
17	Denali W (3–0 sets)	3	0	4	4	0	1.33	7	2.33	.	.	.	.	.	4.0	7.12
19	Dallas W (3–0 sets)	3	0	3	3	0	1.00	5	1.67	.	.	.	.	.	4.5	7.37
22	Carlsbad W (3–2 sets)	5	0	8	8	0	1.60	3	0.60	.	.	.	.	.	9.0	6.76
23	Pekin L (0–3 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	3	1.00	.	.	.	.	.	2.0	2.42
25	San Jose L (0–3 sets)	3	1	2	3	0	1.00	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	4.0	5.02
26	Baton Rouge W (3–0 sets)	3	0	3	3	0	1.00	5	1.67	.	.	.	.	.	5.5	6.78
30	Sheboygan W (3–2 sets)	5	0	8	8	1	1.60	2	0.40	.	.	.	.	.	11.0	6.70
33	Portland W (3–2 sets)	5	0	2	2	2	0.40	5	1.00	.	.	.	.	.	3.0	3.92
35	Teutopolis W (3–1 sets)	4	0	3	3	0	0.75	3	0.75	.	.	.	.	.	3.5	5.73
38	Alton L (0–3 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	7	2.33	.	.	.	.	.	3.0	4.24
39	Dallas W (3–2 sets)	5	0	7	7	1	1.40	3	0.60	.	.	.	.	.	9.5	6.52
40	Alton L (1–3 sets)	4	.	.	.	.	.	3	0.75	.	.	.	.	.	1.0	1.92
44	Pekin W (3–1 sets)	4	0	2	2	1	0.50	4	1.00	.	.	.	.	.	4.0	4.20
45	Portland W (3–2 sets)	5	2	0	2	2	0.40	3	0.60	.	.	.	.	.	7.0	3.86
Total		82	7	58	65	10	0.79	82	1.00	.	.	.	.	.	127.0	5.49