Players

Leopoldo Morales 5 Right Side (RS)
Player Skills
SERVING	RECEIVING	BLOCKING	ATTACKING	DEFENSE	SETTING
12	-	13	12	12	-

Match		Sets	Attack					Serve						Set
m	opponent/sets	sp	k	k/s	e	ta	pct	pts	sa	se	sa/s	ta	pct	a	a/s	ta	pct	pts	rating
1	Arlington L (0–3 sets)	3	3	1.00	5	21	-.095	5	1	3	0.33	11	.727	.	.	.	.	5.0	6.33
2	Quincy L (0–3 sets)	3	0	0.00	5	15	-.333	3	2	1	0.67	7	.857	.	.	.	.	2.0	2.68
3	Cincinnati L (0–3 sets)	3	2	0.67	1	9	.111	0	0	2	0.00	6	.667	.	.	.	.	2.0	3.19
6	Kentucky L (1–3 sets)	4	6	1.50	7	24	-.042	7	0	2	0.00	15	.867	.	.	.	.	7.5	6.53
8	Portland W (3–1 sets)	4	3	0.75	2	12	.083	6	2	4	0.50	14	.714	.	.	.	.	6.0	4.63
10	Arlington L (1–3 sets)	4	7	1.75	2	17	.294	5	1	2	0.25	13	.846	.	.	.	.	8.5	4.56
14	Dallas L (2–3 sets)	5	10	2.00	5	22	.227	4	0	2	0.00	14	.857	.	.	.	.	12.0	6.93
15	Alton L (0–3 sets)	3	1	0.33	4	12	-.250	0	0	3	0.00	6	.500	.	.	.	.	1.0	1.78
17	Tucson L (0–3 sets)	3	3	1.00	3	15	.000	1	0	1	0.00	8	.875	.	.	.	.	3.5	3.70
18	Schenectady L (0–3 sets)	3	3	1.00	3	12	.000	1	1	2	0.33	6	.667	.	.	.	.	4.5	3.28
21	Antioch W (3–0 sets)	3	7	2.33	0	11	.636	6	0	2	0.00	12	.833	.	.	.	.	8.5	8.06
22	Teutopolis L (0–3 sets)	3	4	1.33	2	14	.143	0	0	2	0.00	8	.750	.	.	.	.	4.5	3.08
31	New Orleans L (0–3 sets)	3	4	1.33	4	12	.000	2	0	2	0.00	8	.750	.	.	.	.	4.5	4.20
36	Tucson W (3–1 sets)	4	7	1.75	5	19	.105	3	0	5	0.00	12	.583	.	.	.	.	9.0	7.21
41	Baton Rouge L (0–3 sets)	3	7	2.33	2	18	.278	2	0	2	0.00	8	.750	.	.	.	.	8.5	6.66
Total		51	67	1.31	50	233	.073	45	7	35	0.14	148	.764	.	.	.	.	87.0	4.85

Match		Sets	Block					Dig		Receive
m	opponent/sets	sp	s	a	t	be	blk/s	d	d/s	3	rt	rcv	e	pct	pts	rating
1	Arlington L (0–3 sets)	3	0	2	2	0	0.67	5	1.67	.	.	.	.	.	5.0	6.33
2	Quincy L (0–3 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	4	1.33	.	.	.	.	.	2.0	2.68
3	Cincinnati L (0–3 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	7	2.33	.	.	.	.	.	2.0	3.19
6	Kentucky L (1–3 sets)	4	0	3	3	0	0.75	4	1.00	.	.	.	.	.	7.5	6.53
8	Portland W (3–1 sets)	4	0	2	2	0	0.50	3	0.75	.	.	.	.	.	6.0	4.63
10	Arlington L (1–3 sets)	4	0	1	1	0	0.25	4	1.00	.	.	.	.	.	8.5	4.56
14	Dallas L (2–3 sets)	5	0	4	4	0	0.80	7	1.40	.	.	.	.	.	12.0	6.93
15	Alton L (0–3 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	2	0.67	.	.	.	.	.	1.0	1.78
17	Tucson L (0–3 sets)	3	0	1	1	1	0.33	4	1.33	.	.	.	.	.	3.5	3.70
18	Schenectady L (0–3 sets)	3	0	1	1	0	0.33	3	1.00	.	.	.	.	.	4.5	3.28
21	Antioch W (3–0 sets)	3	0	3	3	0	1.00	4	1.33	.	.	.	.	.	8.5	8.06
22	Teutopolis L (0–3 sets)	3	0	1	1	1	0.33	1	0.33	.	.	.	.	.	4.5	3.08
31	New Orleans L (0–3 sets)	3	0	1	1	0	0.33	4	1.33	.	.	.	.	.	4.5	4.20
36	Tucson W (3–1 sets)	4	0	4	4	0	1.00	8	2.00	.	.	.	.	.	9.0	7.21
41	Baton Rouge L (0–3 sets)	3	0	3	3	0	1.00	3	1.00	.	.	.	.	.	8.5	6.66
Total		51	0	26	26	4	0.51	63	1.24	.	.	.	.	.	87.0	4.85