Players

Match		Sets	Attack					Serve						Set
m	opponent/sets	sp	k	k/s	e	ta	pct	pts	sa	se	sa/s	ta	pct	a	a/s	ta	pct	pts	rating
1	Teutopolis W (3–2 sets)	5	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	2	0.40	7	.286	0.0	8.81
3	Denali L (0–3 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	3	1.00	9	.333	0.0	5.40
9	Burlington W (3–2 sets)	5	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	0	0.00	10	.000	0.0	5.73
11	Kentucky W (3–1 sets)	4	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	5	1.25	12	.417	0.0	7.03
14	Merritt Island L (0–3 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	2	0	1	0.00	7	.857	3	1.00	7	.429	0.0	3.40
15	Tucson L (2–3 sets)	5	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	4	0.80	9	.444	0.0	8.16
17	Burlington W (3–1 sets)	4	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	3	0.75	8	.375	0.0	6.93
18	San Jose L (2–3 sets)	5	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	4	0.80	6	.667	0.0	5.35
21	Quincy W (3–1 sets)	4	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	2	0.50	8	.250	0.0	4.80
22	Burlington L (0–3 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	2	0.67	5	.400	0.0	9.24
29	Nashville W (3–1 sets)	4	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	5	1.25	7	.714	0.0	5.45
Total		45	.	.	.	.	.	2	0	1	0.00	7	.857	33	0.73	88	.375	0.0	6.39

Match		Sets	Block					Dig		Receive
m	opponent/sets	sp	s	a	t	be	blk/s	d	d/s	3	rt	rcv	e	pct	pts	rating
1	Teutopolis W (3–2 sets)	5	.	.	.	.	.	16	3.20	22	2.47	34	2	.941	0.0	8.81
3	Denali L (0–3 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	6	2.00	16	2.03	29	5	.828	0.0	5.40
9	Burlington W (3–2 sets)	5	.	.	.	.	.	16	3.20	8	1.77	26	3	.885	0.0	5.73
11	Kentucky W (3–1 sets)	4	.	.	.	.	.	12	3.00	16	2.21	33	0	1.000	0.0	7.03
14	Merritt Island L (0–3 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	2	0.67	11	2.04	27	2	.926	0.0	3.40
15	Tucson L (2–3 sets)	5	.	.	.	.	.	9	1.80	14	2.63	19	0	1.000	0.0	8.16
17	Burlington W (3–1 sets)	4	.	.	.	.	.	9	2.25	15	2.41	27	1	.963	0.0	6.93
18	San Jose L (2–3 sets)	5	.	.	.	.	.	8	1.60	14	2.18	28	1	.964	0.0	5.35
21	Quincy W (3–1 sets)	4	.	.	.	.	.	6	1.50	13	2.22	27	0	1.000	0.0	4.80
22	Burlington L (0–3 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	9	3.00	8	2.64	11	0	1.000	0.0	9.24
29	Nashville W (3–1 sets)	4	.	.	.	.	.	5	1.25	18	2.36	33	2	.939	0.0	5.45
Total		45	.	.	.	.	.	98	2.18	155	2.24	294	16	.946	0.0	6.39