Players

Paolo Caldera 5 Middle Blocker (MB)
Player Skills
SERVING	RECEIVING	BLOCKING	ATTACKING	DEFENSE	SETTING
14	-	14	11	10	-

Match		Sets	Attack					Serve						Set
m	opponent/sets	sp	k	k/s	e	ta	pct	pts	sa	se	sa/s	ta	pct	a	a/s	ta	pct	pts	rating
3	New Orleans W (3–0 sets)	3	3	1.00	2	8	.125	5	1	0	0.33	11	1.000	.	.	.	.	6.0	6.28
4	Tucson L (0–3 sets)	3	4	1.33	4	10	.000	4	1	0	0.33	13	1.000	.	.	.	.	6.0	5.15
5	San Diego W (3–1 sets)	4	6	1.50	3	12	.250	9	2	4	0.50	20	.800	.	.	.	.	9.5	5.87
7	San Jose L (0–3 sets)	3	0	0.00	2	6	-.333	4	1	2	0.33	11	.818	.	.	.	.	1.0	2.05
9	St. Charles W (3–1 sets)	4	6	1.50	2	19	.211	10	0	3	0.00	18	.833	.	.	.	.	10.0	8.46
11	Albuquerque L (0–3 sets)	3	2	0.67	1	8	.125	0	0	1	0.00	6	.833	.	.	.	.	4.5	4.73
13	Tucson W (3–2 sets)	5	12	2.40	5	21	.333	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	13.0	4.10
16	Schenectady L (0–3 sets)	3	2	0.67	2	5	.000	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	2.0	1.00
18	Kentucky W (3–1 sets)	4	5	1.25	0	7	.714	10	1	3	0.25	19	.842	.	.	.	.	9.0	7.36
19	Tucson L (0–3 sets)	3	4	1.33	2	11	.182	3	2	2	0.67	10	.800	.	.	.	.	7.5	4.87
29	San Jose L (1–3 sets)	4	5	1.25	3	11	.182	2	0	1	0.00	12	.917	.	.	.	.	6.5	4.19
30	Tucson W (3–2 sets)	5	6	1.20	3	16	.188	6	1	4	0.20	20	.800	.	.	.	.	8.5	4.26
34	Denali W (3–0 sets)	3	7	2.33	0	9	.778	7	1	0	0.33	13	1.000	.	.	.	.	11.0	9.40
35	Alton L (1–3 sets)	4	6	1.50	2	10	.400	6	1	2	0.25	18	.889	.	.	.	.	7.0	3.65
39	San Diego L (0–3 sets)	3	1	0.33	4	7	-.429	4	0	2	0.00	10	.800	.	.	.	.	1.0	2.18
40	Teutopolis L (0–3 sets)	3	4	1.33	2	12	.167	3	0	1	0.00	10	.900	.	.	.	.	4.0	2.95
44	Mat-Su W (3–0 sets)	3	5	1.67	1	10	.400	5	0	1	0.00	14	.929	.	.	.	.	6.0	5.71
45	Baton Rouge L (2–3 sets)	5	4	0.80	2	11	.182	10	5	3	1.00	24	.875	.	.	.	.	10.5	3.79
Total		65	82	1.26	40	193	.218	88	16	29	0.25	229	.873	.	.	.	.	123.0	4.78

Match		Sets	Block					Dig		Receive
m	opponent/sets	sp	s	a	t	be	blk/s	d	d/s	3	rt	rcv	e	pct	pts	rating
3	New Orleans W (3–0 sets)	3	0	4	4	0	1.33	1	0.33	.	.	.	.	.	6.0	6.28
4	Tucson L (0–3 sets)	3	0	2	2	0	0.67	1	0.33	.	.	.	.	.	6.0	5.15
5	San Diego W (3–1 sets)	4	0	3	3	0	0.75	1	0.25	.	.	.	.	.	9.5	5.87
7	San Jose L (0–3 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	1.0	2.05
9	St. Charles W (3–1 sets)	4	1	6	7	0	1.75	2	0.50	.	.	.	.	.	10.0	8.46
11	Albuquerque L (0–3 sets)	3	1	3	4	1	1.33	1	0.33	.	.	.	.	.	4.5	4.73
13	Tucson W (3–2 sets)	5	1	0	1	0	0.20	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	13.0	4.10
16	Schenectady L (0–3 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	2.0	1.00
18	Kentucky W (3–1 sets)	4	0	6	6	1	1.50	1	0.25	.	.	.	.	.	9.0	7.36
19	Tucson L (0–3 sets)	3	1	1	2	0	0.67	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	7.5	4.87
29	San Jose L (1–3 sets)	4	0	3	3	0	0.75	1	0.25	.	.	.	.	.	6.5	4.19
30	Tucson W (3–2 sets)	5	0	3	3	1	0.60	2	0.40	.	.	.	.	.	8.5	4.26
34	Denali W (3–0 sets)	3	1	4	5	0	1.67	3	1.00	.	.	.	.	.	11.0	9.40
35	Alton L (1–3 sets)	4	.	.	.	.	.	1	0.25	.	.	.	.	.	7.0	3.65
39	San Diego L (0–3 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	1	0.33	.	.	.	.	.	1.0	2.18
40	Teutopolis L (0–3 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	4.0	2.95
44	Mat-Su W (3–0 sets)	3	0	2	2	1	0.67	2	0.67	.	.	.	.	.	6.0	5.71
45	Baton Rouge L (2–3 sets)	5	0	3	3	1	0.60	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	10.5	3.79
Total		65	5	40	45	8	0.69	17	0.26	.	.	.	.	.	123.0	4.78