Players

Viraj Skinner 5 Outside Hitter (OH)
Player Skills
SERVING	RECEIVING	BLOCKING	ATTACKING	DEFENSE	SETTING
11	11	11	15	12	4

Career Honors

S32nd All-BIG-EAST

S42nd All-BIG-EAST

Match		Sets	Attack					Serve						Set
m	opponent/sets	sp	k	k/s	e	ta	pct	pts	sa	se	sa/s	ta	pct	a	a/s	ta	pct	pts	rating
1	Sheboygan L (2–3 sets)	5	19	3.80	8	36	.306	6	1	2	0.20	18	.889	.	.	.	.	20.5	8.51
2	Baton Rouge L (1–3 sets)	4	19	4.75	7	32	.375	4	0	4	0.00	13	.692	1	0.25	1	1.000	19.5	7.21
3	Teutopolis L (0–3 sets)	3	5	1.67	8	18	-.167	2	0	2	0.00	9	.778	.	.	.	.	5.0	2.57
6	Teutopolis W (3–0 sets)	3	10	3.33	6	24	.167	2	1	2	0.33	10	.800	1	0.33	2	.500	11.5	6.28
7	Columbia L (2–3 sets)	5	16	3.20	9	41	.171	4	2	2	0.40	12	.833	1	0.20	2	.500	19.0	5.92
8	Schenectady L (0–3 sets)	3	11	3.67	6	28	.179	1	0	1	0.00	8	.875	.	.	.	.	12.5	6.00
9	Santa Clara W (3–0 sets)	3	10	3.33	3	23	.304	8	0	1	0.00	15	.933	.	.	.	.	11.5	7.10
11	Albuquerque W (3–1 sets)	4	19	4.75	7	40	.300	2	0	3	0.00	10	.700	.	.	.	.	21.5	7.55
15	Mendon W (3–2 sets)	5	14	2.80	6	29	.276	11	1	5	0.20	20	.750	.	.	.	.	18.0	6.79
16	Baton Rouge W (3–0 sets)	3	10	3.33	1	14	.643	6	1	3	0.33	11	.727	.	.	.	.	11.5	7.68
17	Pekin W (3–0 sets)	3	7	2.33	2	15	.333	9	0	2	0.00	14	.857	0	0.00	1	.000	8.0	6.21
20	Teutopolis W (3–0 sets)	3	16	5.33	3	29	.448	5	0	2	0.00	11	.818	.	.	.	.	18.0	9.35
21	Schenectady W (3–1 sets)	4	8	2.00	6	21	.095	6	1	4	0.25	14	.714	1	0.25	2	.500	10.0	3.76
24	Santa Clara W (3–1 sets)	4	17	4.25	5	40	.300	8	0	4	0.00	16	.750	1	0.25	1	1.000	17.0	7.42
28	Albuquerque W (3–2 sets)	5	18	3.60	3	27	.556	5	1	3	0.20	15	.800	.	.	.	.	20.0	7.56
33	San Diego L (0–3 sets)	3	17	5.67	4	32	.406	1	1	1	0.33	8	.875	.	.	.	.	18.0	6.86
34	Quincy L (2–3 sets)	5	17	3.40	4	29	.448	5	1	5	0.20	19	.737	3	0.60	2	1.500	19.5	7.48
41	Columbia L (0–3 sets)	3	4	1.33	7	21	-.143	2	0	2	0.00	8	.750	1	0.33	2	.500	4.0	2.87
Total		68	237	3.49	95	499	.285	87	10	48	0.15	231	.792	10	0.15	13	.769	265.0	6.51

Match		Sets	Block					Dig		Receive
m	opponent/sets	sp	s	a	t	be	blk/s	d	d/s	3	rt	rcv	e	pct	pts	rating
1	Sheboygan L (2–3 sets)	5	0	1	1	1	0.20	14	2.80	13	2.53	19	1	.947	20.5	8.51
2	Baton Rouge L (1–3 sets)	4	0	1	1	0	0.25	11	2.75	12	1.89	28	5	.821	19.5	7.21
3	Teutopolis L (0–3 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	6	2.00	7	1.87	15	2	.867	5.0	2.57
6	Teutopolis W (3–0 sets)	3	0	1	1	0	0.33	7	2.33	7	2.00	19	1	.947	11.5	6.28
7	Columbia L (2–3 sets)	5	1	0	1	2	0.20	2	0.40	20	2.20	40	4	.900	19.0	5.92
8	Schenectady L (0–3 sets)	3	1	1	2	0	0.67	2	0.67	13	1.97	31	4	.871	12.5	6.00
9	Santa Clara W (3–0 sets)	3	0	3	3	0	1.00	3	1.00	9	2.00	18	3	.833	11.5	7.10
11	Albuquerque W (3–1 sets)	4	0	5	5	0	1.25	6	1.50	12	1.96	27	4	.852	21.5	7.55
15	Mendon W (3–2 sets)	5	0	6	6	0	1.20	13	2.60	14	2.03	33	4	.879	18.0	6.79
16	Baton Rouge W (3–0 sets)	3	0	1	1	1	0.33	9	3.00	10	2.25	20	2	.900	11.5	7.68
17	Pekin W (3–0 sets)	3	0	2	2	0	0.67	9	3.00	6	2.07	15	1	.933	8.0	6.21
20	Teutopolis W (3–0 sets)	3	0	4	4	0	1.33	4	1.33	10	2.29	17	2	.882	18.0	9.35
21	Schenectady W (3–1 sets)	4	0	2	2	0	0.50	6	1.50	13	1.90	31	4	.871	10.0	3.76
24	Santa Clara W (3–1 sets)	4	.	.	.	.	.	9	2.25	17	2.03	33	6	.818	17.0	7.42
28	Albuquerque W (3–2 sets)	5	0	2	2	1	0.40	14	2.80	14	2.19	27	4	.852	20.0	7.56
33	San Diego L (0–3 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	9	3.00	9	1.82	28	4	.857	18.0	6.86
34	Quincy L (2–3 sets)	5	0	3	3	0	0.60	8	1.60	19	2.39	28	1	.964	19.5	7.48
41	Columbia L (0–3 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	7	2.33	8	1.95	21	2	.905	4.0	2.87
Total		68	2	32	34	5	0.50	139	2.04	213	2.07	450	54	.880	265.0	6.51