Players

Match		Sets	Attack					Serve						Set
m	opponent/sets	sp	k	k/s	e	ta	pct	pts	sa	se	sa/s	ta	pct	a	a/s	ta	pct	pts	rating
3	Burlington L (1–3 sets)	4	4	1.00	2	14	.143	10	2	3	0.50	21	.857	25	6.25	97	.258	7.5	4.75
6	New Orleans W (3–2 sets)	5	3	0.60	0	7	.429	17	5	3	1.00	28	.893	28	5.60	116	.241	11.0	5.25
9	Denali L (0–3 sets)	3	2	0.67	0	7	.286	2	0	3	0.00	8	.625	19	6.33	69	.275	2.0	2.20
12	Cincinnati L (0–3 sets)	3	2	0.67	0	5	.400	2	0	2	0.00	8	.750	14	4.67	53	.264	2.0	2.20
15	Schenectady L (0–3 sets)	3	1	0.33	0	4	.250	4	3	1	1.00	11	.909	21	7.00	74	.284	4.5	3.02
18	Spokane W (3–2 sets)	5	2	0.40	0	12	.167	5	0	2	0.00	14	.857	55	11.00	99	.556	3.5	6.14
21	Teutopolis L (0–3 sets)	3	0	0.00	0	3	.000	0	0	1	0.00	5	.800	22	7.33	66	.333	1.0	2.47
25	Albuquerque L (0–3 sets)	3	1	0.33	0	6	.167	0	0	1	0.00	7	.857	24	8.00	66	.364	3.0	3.78
39	Columbia L (0–3 sets)	3	0	0.00	0	4	.000	3	0	1	0.00	10	.900	37	12.33	61	.607	0.0	6.26
Total		32	15	0.47	2	62	.210	43	10	17	0.31	112	.848	245	7.66	701	.350	34.5	4.01

Match		Sets	Block					Dig		Receive
m	opponent/sets	sp	s	a	t	be	blk/s	d	d/s	3	rt	rcv	e	pct	pts	rating
3	Burlington L (1–3 sets)	4	0	3	3	0	0.75	8	2.00	.	.	.	.	.	7.5	4.75
6	New Orleans W (3–2 sets)	5	0	6	6	0	1.20	11	2.20	.	.	.	.	.	11.0	5.25
9	Denali L (0–3 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	2	0.67	.	.	.	.	.	2.0	2.20
12	Cincinnati L (0–3 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	2	0.67	.	.	.	.	.	2.0	2.20
15	Schenectady L (0–3 sets)	3	0	1	1	0	0.33	1	0.33	.	.	.	.	.	4.5	3.02
18	Spokane W (3–2 sets)	5	0	3	3	1	0.60	7	1.40	.	.	.	.	.	3.5	6.14
21	Teutopolis L (0–3 sets)	3	0	2	2	0	0.67	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	1.0	2.47
25	Albuquerque L (0–3 sets)	3	1	2	3	2	1.00	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	3.0	3.78
39	Columbia L (0–3 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	1	0.33	.	.	.	.	.	0.0	6.26
Total		32	1	17	18	3	0.56	32	1.00	.	.	.	.	.	34.5	4.01