Players

Match		Sets	Attack					Serve						Set
m	opponent/sets	sp	k	k/s	e	ta	pct	pts	sa	se	sa/s	ta	pct	a	a/s	ta	pct	pts	rating
1	New Orleans W (3–2 sets)	5	2	0.40	0	6	.333	3	1	5	0.20	15	.667	36	7.20	84	.429	4.5	3.62
4	Starkville L (1–3 sets)	4	1	0.25	1	5	.000	3	1	4	0.25	13	.692	31	7.75	86	.360	4.0	4.70
12	Alton L (2–3 sets)	5	1	0.20	0	4	.250	11	3	5	0.60	20	.750	41	8.20	99	.414	5.0	3.69
15	Carlsbad L (2–3 sets)	5	3	0.60	1	11	.182	3	0	2	0.00	14	.857	33	6.60	103	.320	4.5	3.02
21	Arlington L (0–3 sets)	3	0	0.00	1	4	-.250	2	1	0	0.33	9	1.000	33	11.00	80	.413	2.0	5.23
22	Burlington L (0–3 sets)	3	2	0.67	0	2	1.000	1	0	3	0.00	7	.571	17	5.67	67	.254	2.0	2.24
Total		25	9	0.36	3	32	.188	23	6	19	0.24	78	.756	191	7.64	519	.368	22.0	3.75

Match		Sets	Block					Dig		Receive
m	opponent/sets	sp	s	a	t	be	blk/s	d	d/s	3	rt	rcv	e	pct	pts	rating
1	New Orleans W (3–2 sets)	5	0	3	3	1	0.60	7	1.40	.	.	.	.	.	4.5	3.62
4	Starkville L (1–3 sets)	4	0	4	4	0	1.00	7	1.75	.	.	.	.	.	4.0	4.70
12	Alton L (2–3 sets)	5	1	0	1	0	0.20	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	5.0	3.69
15	Carlsbad L (2–3 sets)	5	0	3	3	0	0.60	5	1.00	.	.	.	.	.	4.5	3.02
21	Arlington L (0–3 sets)	3	0	2	2	0	0.67	2	0.67	.	.	.	.	.	2.0	5.23
22	Burlington L (0–3 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	4	1.33	.	.	.	.	.	2.0	2.24
Total		25	1	12	13	1	0.52	25	1.00	.	.	.	.	.	22.0	3.75