Players

Match		Sets	Attack					Serve						Set
m	opponent/sets	sp	k	k/s	e	ta	pct	pts	sa	se	sa/s	ta	pct	a	a/s	ta	pct	pts	rating
1	Burlington W (3–1 sets)	4	4	1.00	1	8	.375	11	0	4	0.00	21	.810	35	8.75	76	.461	4.0	5.64
3	Arlington W (3–2 sets)	5	3	0.60	0	5	.600	3	1	7	0.20	16	.563	63	12.60	114	.553	6.5	8.48
4	Manitowoc W (3–2 sets)	5	1	0.20	1	8	.000	8	2	2	0.40	20	.900	31	6.20	94	.330	5.5	3.86
5	Mendon W (3–1 sets)	4	0	0.00	1	4	-.250	12	4	2	1.00	22	.909	45	11.25	91	.495	4.5	6.37
7	Schenectady L (0–3 sets)	3	2	0.67	0	4	.500	7	0	0	0.00	16	1.000	33	11.00	62	.532	2.0	6.28
9	Antioch W (3–0 sets)	3	1	0.33	1	5	.000	6	0	3	0.00	15	.800	47	15.67	67	.701	1.0	8.82
10	Burlington L (1–3 sets)	4	0	0.00	0	2	.000	3	0	6	0.00	16	.625	53	13.25	87	.609	1.0	7.76
11	Sheboygan W (3–2 sets)	5	2	0.40	0	3	.667	7	2	3	0.40	20	.850	62	12.40	111	.559	4.0	7.46
14	Cincinnati L (1–3 sets)	4	3	0.75	0	6	.500	5	0	4	0.00	16	.750	43	10.75	78	.551	5.5	6.99
18	Quincy W (3–0 sets)	3	1	0.33	0	5	.200	7	0	1	0.00	15	.933	38	12.67	68	.559	2.5	9.64
19	Mendon W (3–0 sets)	3	0	0.00	0	2	.000	6	0	2	0.00	14	.857	47	15.67	60	.783	1.5	9.68
22	Antioch L (1–3 sets)	4	1	0.25	0	8	.125	7	1	4	0.25	18	.778	43	10.75	91	.473	3.0	5.89
25	Teutopolis L (1–3 sets)	4	1	0.25	0	3	.333	7	2	1	0.50	17	.941	38	9.50	77	.494	3.5	4.75
33	Manitowoc W (3–0 sets)	3	1	0.33	0	2	.500	1	0	4	0.00	7	.429	40	13.33	54	.741	1.5	7.84
36	Albuquerque W (3–1 sets)	4	2	0.50	0	4	.500	5	0	3	0.00	17	.824	60	15.00	86	.698	2.5	8.60
41	Starkville L (1–3 sets)	4	0	0.00	0	5	.000	2	1	4	0.25	14	.714	46	11.50	72	.639	2.5	6.08
46	Quincy W (3–1 sets)	4	0	0.00	1	5	-.200	6	0	2	0.00	19	.895	57	14.25	81	.704	1.5	8.56
Total		66	22	0.33	5	79	.215	103	13	52	0.20	283	.816	781	11.83	1369	.570	52.5	7.22

Match		Sets	Block					Dig		Receive
m	opponent/sets	sp	s	a	t	be	blk/s	d	d/s	3	rt	rcv	e	pct	pts	rating
1	Burlington W (3–1 sets)	4	.	.	.	.	.	10	2.50	.	.	.	.	.	4.0	5.64
3	Arlington W (3–2 sets)	5	0	5	5	0	1.00	5	1.00	.	.	.	.	.	6.5	8.48
4	Manitowoc W (3–2 sets)	5	0	5	5	0	1.00	6	1.20	.	.	.	.	.	5.5	3.86
5	Mendon W (3–1 sets)	4	0	1	1	1	0.25	4	1.00	.	.	.	.	.	4.5	6.37
7	Schenectady L (0–3 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	5	1.67	.	.	.	.	.	2.0	6.28
9	Antioch W (3–0 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	4	1.33	.	.	.	.	.	1.0	8.82
10	Burlington L (1–3 sets)	4	0	2	2	0	0.50	3	0.75	.	.	.	.	.	1.0	7.76
11	Sheboygan W (3–2 sets)	5	.	.	.	.	.	6	1.20	.	.	.	.	.	4.0	7.46
14	Cincinnati L (1–3 sets)	4	0	5	5	1	1.25	5	1.25	.	.	.	.	.	5.5	6.99
18	Quincy W (3–0 sets)	3	0	3	3	0	1.00	7	2.33	.	.	.	.	.	2.5	9.64
19	Mendon W (3–0 sets)	3	0	3	3	0	1.00	4	1.33	.	.	.	.	.	1.5	9.68
22	Antioch L (1–3 sets)	4	0	2	2	0	0.50	2	0.50	.	.	.	.	.	3.0	5.89
25	Teutopolis L (1–3 sets)	4	0	1	1	1	0.25	1	0.25	.	.	.	.	.	3.5	4.75
33	Manitowoc W (3–0 sets)	3	0	1	1	0	0.33	4	1.33	.	.	.	.	.	1.5	7.84
36	Albuquerque W (3–1 sets)	4	0	1	1	0	0.25	3	0.75	.	.	.	.	.	2.5	8.60
41	Starkville L (1–3 sets)	4	0	3	3	0	0.75	3	0.75	.	.	.	.	.	2.5	6.08
46	Quincy W (3–1 sets)	4	0	3	3	0	0.75	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	1.5	8.56
Total		66	0	35	35	3	0.53	72	1.09	.	.	.	.	.	52.5	7.22