Players

Giorgio Madrigal 5 Outside Hitter (OH)
Player Skills
SERVING	RECEIVING	BLOCKING	ATTACKING	DEFENSE	SETTING
13	13	11	13	11	5

Match		Sets	Attack					Serve						Set
m	opponent/sets	sp	k	k/s	e	ta	pct	pts	sa	se	sa/s	ta	pct	a	a/s	ta	pct	pts	rating
1	Burlington L (0–3 sets)	3	9	3.00	7	29	.069	2	0	2	0.00	9	.778	.	.	.	.	9.0	5.22
2	Mendon L (1–3 sets)	4	13	3.25	5	27	.296	4	1	5	0.25	13	.615	.	.	.	.	15.5	7.93
4	Cincinnati L (0–3 sets)	3	9	3.00	1	17	.471	5	1	0	0.33	11	1.000	0	0.00	1	.000	10.5	7.33
5	Alton W (3–1 sets)	4	4	1.00	2	9	.222	5	2	4	0.50	13	.692	.	.	.	.	7.5	2.91
10	Burlington L (2–3 sets)	5	12	2.40	3	20	.450	3	2	4	0.40	14	.714	.	.	.	.	15.5	4.29
11	Mendon L (0–3 sets)	3	8	2.67	2	16	.375	4	1	2	0.33	13	.846	.	.	.	.	11.5	6.75
13	Cincinnati L (0–3 sets)	3	7	2.33	2	15	.333	3	0	2	0.00	9	.778	.	.	.	.	7.5	5.23
15	St. Charles W (3–0 sets)	3	11	3.67	2	17	.529	5	0	4	0.00	11	.636	0	0.00	1	.000	11.0	7.17
17	Starkville L (0–3 sets)	3	11	3.67	5	19	.316	5	1	3	0.33	14	.786	1	0.33	1	1.000	12.0	7.42
18	Portland L (2–3 sets)	5	18	3.60	5	29	.448	15	2	2	0.40	27	.926	.	.	.	.	21.0	8.75
21	Albuquerque L (0–3 sets)	3	5	1.67	5	19	.000	1	0	3	0.00	8	.625	1	0.33	1	1.000	6.0	4.32
22	Cincinnati L (1–3 sets)	4	23	5.75	4	34	.559	3	1	3	0.25	13	.769	.	.	.	.	27.0	8.47
25	Teutopolis L (1–3 sets)	4	22	5.50	6	40	.400	5	1	2	0.25	14	.857	.	.	.	.	24.0	8.36
29	Sheboygan L (2–3 sets)	5	16	3.20	1	20	.750	7	1	2	0.20	18	.889	.	.	.	.	19.0	7.31
36	St. Charles L (0–3 sets)	3	3	1.00	1	8	.250	0	0	1	0.00	5	.800	1	0.33	2	.500	3.0	2.25
39	Alton L (0–3 sets)	3	8	2.67	2	16	.375	5	2	2	0.67	12	.833	.	.	.	.	11.0	4.88
44	Manitowoc W (3–0 sets)	3	12	4.00	3	21	.429	3	0	1	0.00	9	.889	.	.	.	.	13.5	7.89
Total		61	191	3.13	56	356	.379	75	15	42	0.25	213	.803	3	0.05	6	.500	224.5	6.26

Match		Sets	Block					Dig		Receive
m	opponent/sets	sp	s	a	t	be	blk/s	d	d/s	3	rt	rcv	e	pct	pts	rating
1	Burlington L (0–3 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	2	0.67	9	2.10	20	2	.900	9.0	5.22
2	Mendon L (1–3 sets)	4	0	3	3	0	0.75	12	3.00	13	2.35	23	2	.913	15.5	7.93
4	Cincinnati L (0–3 sets)	3	0	1	1	0	0.33	4	1.33	11	2.50	14	2	.857	10.5	7.33
5	Alton W (3–1 sets)	4	1	1	2	0	0.50	3	0.75	15	1.86	35	6	.829	7.5	2.91
10	Burlington L (2–3 sets)	5	0	3	3	0	0.60	.	.	14	2.14	37	1	.973	15.5	4.29
11	Mendon L (0–3 sets)	3	0	5	5	0	1.67	3	1.00	8	2.27	15	0	1.000	11.5	6.75
13	Cincinnati L (0–3 sets)	3	0	1	1	0	0.33	3	1.00	10	2.33	15	2	.867	7.5	5.23
15	St. Charles W (3–0 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	3	1.00	8	2.33	15	0	1.000	11.0	7.17
17	Starkville L (0–3 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	3	1.00	14	2.43	23	0	1.000	12.0	7.42
18	Portland L (2–3 sets)	5	0	2	2	0	0.40	10	2.00	17	2.59	22	0	1.000	21.0	8.75
21	Albuquerque L (0–3 sets)	3	0	2	2	0	0.67	5	1.67	13	2.39	23	0	1.000	6.0	4.32
22	Cincinnati L (1–3 sets)	4	2	2	4	0	1.00	4	1.00	18	2.24	29	2	.931	27.0	8.47
25	Teutopolis L (1–3 sets)	4	0	2	2	0	0.50	3	0.75	18	2.28	29	2	.931	24.0	8.36
29	Sheboygan L (2–3 sets)	5	0	4	4	0	0.80	9	1.80	9	2.21	24	0	1.000	19.0	7.31
36	St. Charles L (0–3 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	17	2.13	31	2	.935	3.0	2.25
39	Alton L (0–3 sets)	3	0	2	2	0	0.67	.	.	7	1.85	20	3	.850	11.0	4.88
44	Manitowoc W (3–0 sets)	3	0	3	3	0	1.00	5	1.67	10	2.14	22	2	.909	13.5	7.89
Total		61	3	31	34	0	0.56	69	1.13	211	2.22	397	26	.935	224.5	6.26