Players

Pierce Spence 5 Outside Hitter (OH)
Player Skills
SERVING	RECEIVING	BLOCKING	ATTACKING	DEFENSE	SETTING
13	13	12	14	12	4

Match		Sets	Attack					Serve						Set
m	opponent/sets	sp	k	k/s	e	ta	pct	pts	sa	se	sa/s	ta	pct	a	a/s	ta	pct	pts	rating
1	Sheboygan W (3–2 sets)	5	11	2.20	3	29	.276	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	12.5	3.85
3	St. Charles W (3–1 sets)	4	12	3.00	3	21	.429	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	12.5	6.35
4	Baton Rouge W (3–2 sets)	5	15	3.00	4	25	.440	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	18.0	6.97
6	Antioch L (2–3 sets)	5	9	1.80	3	26	.231	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	9.5	4.95
7	Teutopolis W (3–0 sets)	3	7	2.33	4	19	.158	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	8.5	5.56
8	Pekin W (3–0 sets)	3	8	2.67	3	18	.278	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	9.0	7.02
11	Schenectady L (2–3 sets)	5	12	2.40	2	23	.435	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	16.5	5.25
12	Sheboygan W (3–1 sets)	4	7	1.75	4	24	.125	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	10.5	4.64
14	Santa Clara W (3–0 sets)	3	7	2.33	0	10	.700	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	8.0	5.85
15	Baton Rouge W (3–1 sets)	4	7	1.75	3	14	.286	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	8.5	2.66
19	Santa Clara W (3–0 sets)	3	10	3.33	0	12	.833	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	11.0	6.57
20	Pekin W (3–0 sets)	3	7	2.33	2	13	.385	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	9.0	6.45
21	Albuquerque W (3–2 sets)	5	11	2.20	6	25	.200	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	13.0	5.57
23	New Orleans W (3–0 sets)	3	10	3.33	2	20	.400	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	14.5	8.29
24	Mendon W (3–1 sets)	4	18	4.50	6	29	.414	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	19.0	7.36
27	Columbia L (0–3 sets)	3	9	3.00	3	19	.316	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	11.0	4.93
29	Mendon W (3–2 sets)	5	7	1.40	1	14	.429	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	10.5	4.74
32	Teutopolis L (1–3 sets)	4	8	2.00	3	15	.333	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	10.5	5.24
34	Mendon W (3–2 sets)	5	14	2.80	4	25	.400	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	14.5	5.26
35	Teutopolis W (3–0 sets)	3	10	3.33	1	13	.692	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	12.5	6.92
Total		79	199	2.52	57	394	.360	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	239.0	5.72

Match		Sets	Block					Dig		Receive
m	opponent/sets	sp	s	a	t	be	blk/s	d	d/s	3	rt	rcv	e	pct	pts	rating
1	Sheboygan W (3–2 sets)	5	1	1	2	0	0.40	4	0.80	NA	NA	38	4	.895	12.5	3.85
3	St. Charles W (3–1 sets)	4	0	1	1	0	0.25	10	2.50	NA	NA	22	2	.909	12.5	6.35
4	Baton Rouge W (3–2 sets)	5	1	4	5	0	1.00	19	3.80	NA	NA	23	2	.913	18.0	6.97
6	Antioch L (2–3 sets)	5	0	1	1	0	0.20	10	2.00	NA	NA	34	2	.941	9.5	4.95
7	Teutopolis W (3–0 sets)	3	0	3	3	0	1.00	7	2.33	NA	NA	18	2	.889	8.5	5.56
8	Pekin W (3–0 sets)	3	0	2	2	1	0.67	6	2.00	NA	NA	22	1	.955	9.0	7.02
11	Schenectady L (2–3 sets)	5	1	1	2	0	0.40	7	1.40	NA	NA	40	4	.900	16.5	5.25
12	Sheboygan W (3–1 sets)	4	0	5	5	0	1.25	7	1.75	NA	NA	24	2	.917	10.5	4.64
14	Santa Clara W (3–0 sets)	3	0	2	2	0	0.67	9	3.00	NA	NA	16	0	1.000	8.0	5.85
15	Baton Rouge W (3–1 sets)	4	0	3	3	0	0.75	3	0.75	NA	NA	31	5	.839	8.5	2.66
19	Santa Clara W (3–0 sets)	3	0	2	2	0	0.67	10	3.33	NA	NA	11	1	.909	11.0	6.57
20	Pekin W (3–0 sets)	3	0	2	2	2	0.67	7	2.33	NA	NA	14	0	1.000	9.0	6.45
21	Albuquerque W (3–2 sets)	5	0	2	2	1	0.40	15	3.00	NA	NA	25	1	.960	13.0	5.57
23	New Orleans W (3–0 sets)	3	0	5	5	0	1.67	7	2.33	NA	NA	15	0	1.000	14.5	8.29
24	Mendon W (3–1 sets)	4	.	.	.	.	.	8	2.00	NA	NA	32	3	.906	19.0	7.36
27	Columbia L (0–3 sets)	3	0	2	2	0	0.67	3	1.00	NA	NA	26	4	.846	11.0	4.93
29	Mendon W (3–2 sets)	5	0	3	3	0	0.60	1	0.20	NA	NA	32	1	.969	10.5	4.74
32	Teutopolis L (1–3 sets)	4	1	1	2	0	0.50	9	2.25	NA	NA	27	1	.963	10.5	5.24
34	Mendon W (3–2 sets)	5	0	1	1	0	0.20	7	1.40	NA	NA	39	4	.897	14.5	5.26
35	Teutopolis W (3–0 sets)	3	0	3	3	0	1.00	10	3.33	NA	NA	15	2	.867	12.5	6.92
Total		79	4	44	48	4	0.61	159	2.01	0	0.00	504	41	.919	239.0	5.72