Players

Toby Braswell 5 Outside Hitter (OH)
Player Skills
SERVING	RECEIVING	BLOCKING	ATTACKING	DEFENSE	SETTING
13	13	10	15	12	6

Match		Sets	Attack					Serve						Set
m	opponent/sets	sp	k	k/s	e	ta	pct	pts	sa	se	sa/s	ta	pct	a	a/s	ta	pct	pts	rating
2	San Diego L (0–3 sets)	3	3	1.00	2	14	.071	0	0	1	0.00	3	.667	.	.	.	.	3.5	3.32
4	Mat-Su L (0–3 sets)	3	0	0.00	3	10	-.300	1	1	1	0.33	6	.833	1	0.33	1	1.000	2.0	1.94
8	San Jose L (0–3 sets)	3	5	1.67	5	16	.000	0	0	2	0.00	4	.500	1	0.33	1	1.000	5.0	1.44
10	Santa Clara L (0–3 sets)	3	7	2.33	7	18	.000	3	0	1	0.00	8	.875	.	.	.	.	9.0	4.86
14	Tucson L (0–3 sets)	3	7	2.33	5	16	.125	2	0	1	0.00	7	.857	0	0.00	1	.000	7.0	2.77
15	Kentucky W (3–2 sets)	5	23	4.60	10	44	.295	12	0	0	0.00	20	1.000	.	.	.	.	24.0	7.66
17	Arlington W (3–2 sets)	5	7	1.40	5	22	.091	5	0	5	0.00	13	.615	0	0.00	1	.000	9.0	3.27
18	Starkville L (0–3 sets)	3	10	3.33	8	28	.071	1	0	1	0.00	7	.857	.	.	.	.	11.0	6.43
21	Manitowoc W (3–1 sets)	4	6	1.50	2	11	.364	0	0	2	0.00	9	.778	.	.	.	.	8.0	4.03
25	Ames L (0–3 sets)	3	8	2.67	4	23	.174	1	0	1	0.00	8	.875	.	.	.	.	8.0	3.45
26	Sheboygan L (0–3 sets)	3	8	2.67	3	16	.313	5	1	2	0.33	11	.818	.	.	.	.	9.0	4.61
31	Cincinnati L (0–3 sets)	3	14	4.67	7	31	.226	2	0	0	0.00	7	1.000	0	0.00	1	.000	14.0	6.72
36	Mendon L (2–3 sets)	5	14	2.80	13	40	.025	5	1	3	0.20	14	.786	.	.	.	.	17.0	5.14
Total		46	112	2.43	74	289	.131	37	3	20	0.07	117	.829	2	0.04	5	.400	126.5	4.28

Match		Sets	Block					Dig		Receive
m	opponent/sets	sp	s	a	t	be	blk/s	d	d/s	3	rt	rcv	e	pct	pts	rating
2	San Diego L (0–3 sets)	3	0	1	1	0	0.33	2	0.67	11	2.26	19	3	.842	3.5	3.32
4	Mat-Su L (0–3 sets)	3	0	2	2	0	0.67	1	0.33	10	1.72	29	4	.862	2.0	1.94
8	San Jose L (0–3 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	3	1.00	7	1.64	22	4	.818	5.0	1.44
10	Santa Clara L (0–3 sets)	3	0	4	4	2	1.33	5	1.67	9	1.83	23	4	.826	9.0	4.86
14	Tucson L (0–3 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	2	0.67	7	1.67	27	5	.815	7.0	2.77
15	Kentucky W (3–2 sets)	5	0	2	2	0	0.40	12	2.40	12	1.87	31	3	.903	24.0	7.66
17	Arlington W (3–2 sets)	5	1	2	3	0	0.60	5	1.00	14	1.94	34	4	.882	9.0	3.27
18	Starkville L (0–3 sets)	3	0	2	2	0	0.67	4	1.33	13	2.11	27	2	.926	11.0	6.43
21	Manitowoc W (3–1 sets)	4	0	4	4	0	1.00	4	1.00	17	2.33	33	0	1.000	8.0	4.03
25	Ames L (0–3 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	2	0.67	10	1.57	28	8	.714	8.0	3.45
26	Sheboygan L (0–3 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	2	0.67	9	1.86	22	4	.818	9.0	4.61
31	Cincinnati L (0–3 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	2	0.67	11	2.10	29	0	1.000	14.0	6.72
36	Mendon L (2–3 sets)	5	0	4	4	0	0.80	5	1.00	12	1.84	31	6	.806	17.0	5.14
Total		46	1	21	22	2	0.48	49	1.07	142	1.91	355	47	.868	126.5	4.28