Players

Match		Sets	Attack					Serve						Set
m	opponent/sets	sp	k	k/s	e	ta	pct	pts	sa	se	sa/s	ta	pct	a	a/s	ta	pct	pts	rating
2	Denali L (2–3 sets)	5	.	.	.	.	.	4	2	6	0.40	14	.571	3	0.60	8	.375	2.0	6.90
3	Kentucky W (3–0 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	6	0	4	0.00	12	.667	6	2.00	9	.667	0.0	9.79
4	Tucson W (3–0 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	4	1	4	0.33	11	.636	4	1.33	4	1.000	1.0	4.46
6	Alton W (3–1 sets)	4	.	.	.	.	.	14	2	1	0.50	21	.952	9	2.25	10	.900	2.0	5.21
8	Albuquerque W (3–0 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	7	0	3	0.00	14	.786	10	3.33	10	1.000	0.0	7.61
9	Ames L (1–3 sets)	4	.	.	.	.	.	7	1	0	0.25	17	1.000	4	1.00	6	.667	1.0	3.53
10	Santa Clara W (3–0 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	7	2.33	7	1.000	0.0	8.74
12	New Orleans L (2–3 sets)	5	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	2	0.40	5	.400	0.0	3.40
13	Tucson L (1–3 sets)	4	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	6	1.50	9	.667	0.0	6.19
14	San Jose W (3–0 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	3	1.00	3	1.000	0.0	9.01
17	Portland L (0–3 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	5	1	2	0.33	11	.818	5	1.67	8	.625	1.0	6.81
19	Tucson L (1–3 sets)	4	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	6	1.50	10	.600	0.0	3.26
21	Schenectady L (0–3 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	2	0.67	8	.250	0.0	6.88
22	San Diego W (3–1 sets)	4	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	3	0.75	7	.429	0.0	5.80
25	St. Charles L (0–3 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	0	0	2	0.00	6	.667	1	0.33	6	.167	0.0	6.10
26	Spokane L (2–3 sets)	5	.	.	.	.	.	9	0	2	0.00	21	.905	4	0.80	14	.286	0.0	6.18
30	Portland L (0–3 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	4	0	0	0.00	11	1.000	4	1.33	6	.667	0.0	5.81
33	Mendon L (2–3 sets)	5	.	.	.	.	.	7	2	4	0.40	19	.789	2	0.40	5	.400	2.0	5.08
Total		67	.	.	.	.	.	67	9	28	0.13	157	.822	81	1.21	135	.600	9.0	6.15

Match		Sets	Block					Dig		Receive
m	opponent/sets	sp	s	a	t	be	blk/s	d	d/s	3	rt	rcv	e	pct	pts	rating
2	Denali L (2–3 sets)	5	.	.	.	.	.	14	2.80	13	2.12	33	1	.970	2.0	6.90
3	Kentucky W (3–0 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	10	3.33	9	2.47	15	0	1.000	0.0	9.79
4	Tucson W (3–0 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	5	1.67	4	1.71	14	1	.929	1.0	4.46
6	Alton W (3–1 sets)	4	.	.	.	.	.	5	1.25	10	2.18	22	2	.909	2.0	5.21
8	Albuquerque W (3–0 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	9	3.00	11	2.22	23	2	.913	0.0	7.61
9	Ames L (1–3 sets)	4	.	.	.	.	.	4	1.00	11	1.88	32	4	.875	1.0	3.53
10	Santa Clara W (3–0 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	9	3.00	6	2.45	11	0	1.000	0.0	8.74
12	New Orleans L (2–3 sets)	5	.	.	.	.	.	4	0.80	16	2.09	32	5	.844	0.0	3.40
13	Tucson L (1–3 sets)	4	.	.	.	.	.	11	2.75	6	2.00	14	2	.857	0.0	6.19
14	San Jose W (3–0 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	8	2.67	12	2.79	14	0	1.000	0.0	9.01
17	Portland L (0–3 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	4	1.33	8	2.42	12	1	.917	1.0	6.81
19	Tucson L (1–3 sets)	4	.	.	.	.	.	5	1.25	9	1.78	23	5	.783	0.0	3.26
21	Schenectady L (0–3 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	7	2.33	11	2.41	17	1	.941	0.0	6.88
22	San Diego W (3–1 sets)	4	.	.	.	.	.	8	2.00	5	2.13	16	0	1.000	0.0	5.80
25	St. Charles L (0–3 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	5	1.67	10	2.38	16	0	1.000	0.0	6.10
26	Spokane L (2–3 sets)	5	.	.	.	.	.	7	1.40	13	2.36	22	0	1.000	0.0	6.18
30	Portland L (0–3 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	5	1.67	14	2.15	26	2	.923	0.0	5.81
33	Mendon L (2–3 sets)	5	.	.	.	.	.	11	2.20	14	1.91	35	6	.829	2.0	5.08
Total		67	.	.	.	.	.	131	1.96	182	2.15	377	32	.915	9.0	6.15