Players

Match		Sets	Attack					Serve						Set
m	opponent/sets	sp	k	k/s	e	ta	pct	pts	sa	se	sa/s	ta	pct	a	a/s	ta	pct	pts	rating
1	Baton Rouge L (2–3 sets)	5	.	.	.	.	.	8	0	3	0.00	18	.833	4	0.80	7	.571	0.0	4.80
4	Merritt Island L (0–3 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	2	1	1	0.33	9	.889	2	0.67	5	.400	1.0	4.88
9	Spokane L (0–3 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	1	0	3	0.00	8	.625	2	0.67	3	.667	0.0	5.40
10	Baton Rouge L (0–3 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	3	0	1	0.00	11	.909	1	0.33	5	.200	0.0	5.90
14	Teutopolis L (0–3 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	2	0	2	0.00	8	.750	0	0.00	5	.000	0.0	5.53
15	Albuquerque L (0–3 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	1	0	3	0.00	7	.571	2	0.67	6	.333	0.0	3.60
18	San Diego L (1–3 sets)	4	.	.	.	.	.	3	1	1	0.25	14	.929	3	0.75	6	.500	1.0	5.60
21	Portland L (2–3 sets)	5	.	.	.	.	.	4	0	4	0.00	17	.765	6	1.20	7	.857	0.0	3.45
22	Spokane W (3–1 sets)	4	.	.	.	.	.	5	1	0	0.25	14	1.000	2	0.50	7	.286	1.0	7.16
29	New Orleans W (3–0 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	16	3	1	1.00	21	.952	7	2.33	9	.778	3.0	4.76
34	Kentucky L (1–3 sets)	4	.	.	.	.	.	10	1	5	0.25	20	.750	5	1.25	10	.500	1.0	6.59
Total		40	.	.	.	.	.	55	7	24	0.18	147	.837	34	0.85	70	.486	7.0	5.24

Match		Sets	Block					Dig		Receive
m	opponent/sets	sp	s	a	t	be	blk/s	d	d/s	3	rt	rcv	e	pct	pts	rating
1	Baton Rouge L (2–3 sets)	5	.	.	.	.	.	7	1.40	18	1.95	41	5	.878	0.0	4.80
4	Merritt Island L (0–3 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	3	1.00	12	2.33	21	0	1.000	1.0	4.88
9	Spokane L (0–3 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	5	1.67	13	2.16	25	0	1.000	0.0	5.40
10	Baton Rouge L (0–3 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	7	2.33	15	2.19	26	4	.846	0.0	5.90
14	Teutopolis L (0–3 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	8	2.67	5	1.86	14	1	.929	0.0	5.53
15	Albuquerque L (0–3 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	3	1.00	9	2.05	19	1	.947	0.0	3.60
18	San Diego L (1–3 sets)	4	.	.	.	.	.	7	1.75	15	2.07	29	5	.828	1.0	5.60
21	Portland L (2–3 sets)	5	.	.	.	.	.	5	1.00	13	1.89	28	5	.821	0.0	3.45
22	Spokane W (3–1 sets)	4	.	.	.	.	.	13	3.25	10	2.00	25	2	.920	1.0	7.16
29	New Orleans W (3–0 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	6	2.00	5	1.67	12	2	.833	3.0	4.76
34	Kentucky L (1–3 sets)	4	.	.	.	.	.	11	2.75	14	2.00	33	3	.909	1.0	6.59
Total		40	.	.	.	.	.	75	1.88	129	2.03	273	28	.897	7.0	5.24