Players

Sam Arnold 5 Setter (S)
Player Skills
SERVING	RECEIVING	BLOCKING	ATTACKING	DEFENSE	SETTING
16	-	16	9	14	15

Season 12 Totals
ASSISTS	KILLS	ACES	DIGS	BLOCKS
909 17th	30 330th	40 10th	90 70th	44 159th

Match Statistics - OFFENSE (Season 12)

Match		Sets	Attack					Serve						Set
m	opponent/sets	sp	k	k/s	e	ta	pct	pts	sa	se	sa/s	ta	pct	a	a/s	ta	pct	pts	rating
1	Cincinnati W (3–1 sets)	4	4	1.00	1	6	.500	7	1	1	0.25	16	.938	36	9.00	87	.414	6.5	6.23
4	Manitowoc L (1–3 sets)	4	2	0.50	2	7	.000	12	3	2	0.75	24	.917	42	10.50	101	.416	6.5	6.91
7	Schenectady L (2–3 sets)	5	0	0.00	0	3	.000	4	2	5	0.40	17	.706	47	9.40	100	.470	3.0	4.76
10	Cincinnati W (3–1 sets)	4	3	0.75	0	6	.500	11	4	2	1.00	22	.909	43	10.75	60	.717	8.0	7.26
12	Mat-Su W (3–0 sets)	3	1	0.33	1	4	.000	8	1	1	0.33	17	.941	37	12.33	53	.698	3.0	8.89
13	Manitowoc W (3–0 sets)	3	0	0.00	0	2	.000	5	0	2	0.00	11	.818	34	11.33	60	.567	3.5	7.63
16	Denali L (1–3 sets)	4	2	0.50	1	9	.111	1	1	3	0.25	13	.769	46	11.50	79	.582	3.0	5.20
18	St. Charles W (3–0 sets)	3	2	0.67	1	6	.167	11	2	3	0.67	18	.833	45	15.00	64	.703	4.0	9.43
19	Schenectady W (3–0 sets)	3	1	0.33	0	1	1.000	4	1	2	0.33	11	.818	33	11.00	51	.647	4.5	6.47
22	Portland W (3–1 sets)	4	4	1.00	2	10	.200	11	4	0	1.00	23	1.000	49	12.25	78	.628	12.0	9.59
23	Alton L (1–3 sets)	4	3	0.75	0	5	.600	5	3	0	0.75	17	1.000	43	10.75	77	.558	6.5	5.38
25	Starkville W (3–1 sets)	4	0	0.00	0	2	.000	9	2	4	0.50	20	.800	51	12.75	86	.593	2.5	7.76
26	Tucson W (3–0 sets)	3	0	0.00	0	1	.000	6	4	1	1.33	14	.929	40	13.33	51	.784	6.5	8.94
30	Tucson W (3–1 sets)	4	0	0.00	0	1	.000	11	2	3	0.50	22	.864	56	14.00	92	.609	2.5	9.10
32	Columbia L (0–3 sets)	3	1	0.33	0	3	.333	3	1	1	0.33	12	.917	30	10.00	52	.577	2.0	4.30
34	Burlington L (0–3 sets)	3	0	0.00	1	2	-.500	5	1	0	0.33	14	1.000	30	10.00	72	.417	1.0	4.76
35	Sheboygan W (3–2 sets)	5	4	0.80	0	8	.500	6	1	5	0.20	20	.750	58	11.60	95	.611	6.5	7.32
39	Alton L (2–3 sets)	5	2	0.40	0	5	.400	10	1	1	0.20	24	.958	47	9.40	90	.522	4.0	5.78
40	Pekin L (1–3 sets)	4	0	0.00	0	2	.000	10	2	2	0.50	23	.913	59	14.75	90	.656	2.0	8.47
44	Sheboygan W (3–1 sets)	4	1	0.25	0	5	.200	5	1	3	0.25	15	.800	45	11.25	79	.570	4.0	6.66
45	Cincinnati L (1–3 sets)	4	0	0.00	2	4	-.500	7	3	0	0.75	18	1.000	38	9.50	72	.528	3.0	4.87
Total		80	30	0.38	11	92	.207	151	40	41	0.50	371	.889	909	11.36	1589	.572	94.5	6.94

Match Statistics - DEFENSE (Season 12)

Match		Sets	Block					Dig		Receive
m	opponent/sets	sp	s	a	t	be	blk/s	d	d/s	3	rt	rcv	e	pct	pts	rating
1	Cincinnati W (3–1 sets)	4	0	3	3	0	0.75	10	2.50	.	.	.	.	.	6.5	6.23
4	Manitowoc L (1–3 sets)	4	1	1	2	0	0.50	5	1.25	.	.	.	.	.	6.5	6.91
7	Schenectady L (2–3 sets)	5	0	2	2	0	0.40	8	1.60	.	.	.	.	.	3.0	4.76
10	Cincinnati W (3–1 sets)	4	0	2	2	0	0.50	7	1.75	.	.	.	.	.	8.0	7.26
12	Mat-Su W (3–0 sets)	3	0	2	2	0	0.67	4	1.33	.	.	.	.	.	3.0	8.89
13	Manitowoc W (3–0 sets)	3	1	5	6	0	2.00	5	1.67	.	.	.	.	.	3.5	7.63
16	Denali L (1–3 sets)	4	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	3.0	5.20
18	St. Charles W (3–0 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	3	1.00	.	.	.	.	.	4.0	9.43
19	Schenectady W (3–0 sets)	3	0	5	5	0	1.67	2	0.67	.	.	.	.	.	4.5	6.47
22	Portland W (3–1 sets)	4	1	6	7	0	1.75	5	1.25	.	.	.	.	.	12.0	9.59
23	Alton L (1–3 sets)	4	0	1	1	0	0.25	1	0.25	.	.	.	.	.	6.5	5.38
25	Starkville W (3–1 sets)	4	0	1	1	0	0.25	3	0.75	.	.	.	.	.	2.5	7.76
26	Tucson W (3–0 sets)	3	2	1	3	0	1.00	2	0.67	.	.	.	.	.	6.5	8.94
30	Tucson W (3–1 sets)	4	0	1	1	0	0.25	6	1.50	.	.	.	.	.	2.5	9.10
32	Columbia L (0–3 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	2	0.67	.	.	.	.	.	2.0	4.30
34	Burlington L (0–3 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	5	1.67	.	.	.	.	.	1.0	4.76
35	Sheboygan W (3–2 sets)	5	0	3	3	0	0.60	3	0.60	.	.	.	.	.	6.5	7.32
39	Alton L (2–3 sets)	5	0	2	2	0	0.40	6	1.20	.	.	.	.	.	4.0	5.78
40	Pekin L (1–3 sets)	4	.	.	.	.	.	4	1.00	.	.	.	.	.	2.0	8.47
44	Sheboygan W (3–1 sets)	4	0	4	4	0	1.00	2	0.50	.	.	.	.	.	4.0	6.66
45	Cincinnati L (1–3 sets)	4	.	.	.	.	.	7	1.75	.	.	.	.	.	3.0	4.87
Total		80	5	39	44	0	0.55	90	1.13	.	.	.	.	.	94.5	6.94