Players

Session 13 Coaches Poll deadline in 7 hours and 27 minutes

MSWL UNITED MSWL U2 TMVL
Wednesday, April 29th, 2026 - 10:32:49 AM (gmt)

TMVL Season 17 // Landing

Logo

Donate ELO Ranking Honor Roll NET Ranking Stats Leaders Teams Of The Week Wall

If you'd like to join please click this link and add your name to the waitlist.

PAC 8 Conference

SEC Conference

BIG 8 Conference

Big East Conference

Jack Lombardo 5 Right Side (RS)
Player Skills
SERVING	RECEIVING	BLOCKING	ATTACKING	DEFENSE	SETTING
16	-	18	17	14	-

Season 11 Totals
KILLS	ATK PCT	ACES	DIGS	BLOCKS
188 110th	.390 133rd	12 202nd	50 245th	23 304th

Career Honors

S121st All-TMVL1st All-PAC-8

S132nd All-PAC-8

Match Statistics - OFFENSE (Season 11)

Match		Sets	Attack					Serve						Set
m	opponent/sets	sp	k	k/s	e	ta	pct	pts	sa	se	sa/s	ta	pct	a	a/s	ta	pct	pts	rating
1	Tucson W (3–0 sets)	3	8	2.67	6	16	.125	2	1	2	0.33	8	.750	.	.	.	.	11.5	7.96
4	Santa Clara L (1–3 sets)	4	13	3.25	4	26	.346	2	0	2	0.00	11	.818	.	.	.	.	13.5	6.18
8	San Diego L (0–3 sets)	3	13	4.33	0	21	.619	0	0	0	0.00	5	1.000	.	.	.	.	13.5	5.68
12	Manitowoc W (3–2 sets)	5	19	3.80	6	33	.394	7	3	2	0.60	17	.882	.	.	.	.	23.0	7.80
14	Carlsbad L (0–3 sets)	3	10	3.33	3	21	.333	4	0	2	0.00	13	.846	.	.	.	.	10.5	5.66
15	Baton Rouge L (1–3 sets)	4	19	4.75	4	29	.517	4	1	3	0.25	12	.750	.	.	.	.	22.5	9.66
17	Pekin L (1–3 sets)	4	18	4.50	8	27	.370	3	0	1	0.00	11	.909	.	.	.	.	21.5	9.27
19	Santa Clara W (3–1 sets)	4	17	4.25	2	20	.750	10	1	3	0.25	19	.842	.	.	.	.	18.0	6.61
21	Cincinnati L (0–3 sets)	3	13	4.33	7	30	.200	8	1	2	0.33	15	.867	.	.	.	.	14.0	7.19
25	Quincy W (3–0 sets)	3	15	5.00	2	20	.650	6	1	0	0.33	12	1.000	.	.	.	.	17.0	9.32
26	Burlington L (0–3 sets)	3	10	3.33	7	21	.143	5	2	1	0.67	11	.909	.	.	.	.	12.0	5.35
31	Kentucky L (2–3 sets)	5	22	4.40	11	42	.262	8	1	6	0.20	19	.684	.	.	.	.	23.0	7.05
34	San Diego W (3–0 sets)	3	11	3.67	2	17	.529	1	1	1	0.33	7	.857	.	.	.	.	12.5	5.46
Total		47	188	4.00	62	323	.390	60	12	25	0.26	160	.844	.	.	.	.	212.5	7.17

Match Statistics - DEFENSE (Season 11)

Match		Sets	Block					Dig		Receive
m	opponent/sets	sp	s	a	t	be	blk/s	d	d/s	3	rt	rcv	e	pct	pts	rating
1	Tucson W (3–0 sets)	3	0	5	5	1	1.67	2	0.67	.	.	.	.	.	11.5	7.96
4	Santa Clara L (1–3 sets)	4	0	1	1	0	0.25	6	1.50	.	.	.	.	.	13.5	6.18
8	San Diego L (0–3 sets)	3	0	1	1	0	0.33	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	13.5	5.68
12	Manitowoc W (3–2 sets)	5	0	2	2	1	0.40	7	1.40	.	.	.	.	.	23.0	7.80
14	Carlsbad L (0–3 sets)	3	0	1	1	0	0.33	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	10.5	5.66
15	Baton Rouge L (1–3 sets)	4	1	3	4	1	1.00	7	1.75	.	.	.	.	.	22.5	9.66
17	Pekin L (1–3 sets)	4	1	5	6	2	1.50	3	0.75	.	.	.	.	.	21.5	9.27
19	Santa Clara W (3–1 sets)	4	.	.	.	.	.	4	1.00	.	.	.	.	.	18.0	6.61
21	Cincinnati L (0–3 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	4	1.33	.	.	.	.	.	14.0	7.19
25	Quincy W (3–0 sets)	3	0	2	2	0	0.67	4	1.33	.	.	.	.	.	17.0	9.32
26	Burlington L (0–3 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	2	0.67	.	.	.	.	.	12.0	5.35
31	Kentucky L (2–3 sets)	5	.	.	.	.	.	11	2.20	.	.	.	.	.	23.0	7.05
34	San Diego W (3–0 sets)	3	0	1	1	0	0.33	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	12.5	5.46
Total		47	2	21	23	7	0.49	50	1.06	.	.	.	.	.	212.5	7.17