Players

Match		Sets	Attack					Serve						Set
m	opponent/sets	sp	k	k/s	e	ta	pct	pts	sa	se	sa/s	ta	pct	a	a/s	ta	pct	pts	rating
3	Dallas L (1–3 sets)	4	3	0.75	0	5	.600	4	2	5	0.50	14	.643	28	7.00	94	.298	7.0	4.52
6	Mat-Su L (0–3 sets)	3	2	0.67	2	10	.000	0	0	2	0.00	6	.667	23	7.67	61	.377	2.0	3.48
7	Alton L (0–3 sets)	3	1	0.33	0	1	1.000	2	0	2	0.00	9	.778	33	11.00	80	.413	2.0	6.07
9	Baton Rouge L (0–3 sets)	3	0	0.00	0	5	.000	1	0	5	0.00	9	.444	32	10.67	70	.457	2.0	5.88
10	Cincinnati L (0–3 sets)	3	1	0.33	0	9	.111	1	1	1	0.33	9	.889	23	7.67	63	.365	2.5	3.34
11	Schenectady W (3–0 sets)	3	3	1.00	1	7	.286	7	0	2	0.00	15	.867	32	10.67	52	.615	3.0	6.30
13	Burlington L (0–3 sets)	3	1	0.33	0	9	.111	0	0	2	0.00	7	.714	21	7.00	46	.457	2.5	3.22
17	Merritt Island L (0–3 sets)	3	1	0.33	1	4	.000	2	1	2	0.33	10	.800	22	7.33	60	.367	2.5	2.90
22	Tucson L (0–3 sets)	3	0	0.00	0	6	.000	3	1	3	0.33	13	.769	40	13.33	86	.465	2.5	8.54
25	Kentucky W (3–0 sets)	3	0	0.00	0	2	.000	3	2	4	0.67	11	.636	37	12.33	70	.529	2.5	7.16
31	Albuquerque L (1–3 sets)	4	1	0.25	0	6	.167	7	1	3	0.25	18	.833	38	9.50	96	.396	4.0	6.17
34	Mendon W (3–1 sets)	4	1	0.25	1	5	.000	7	0	3	0.00	17	.824	47	11.75	81	.580	2.5	7.95
39	Sheboygan W (3–2 sets)	5	2	0.40	1	10	.100	4	1	4	0.20	16	.750	56	11.20	100	.560	5.5	6.46
41	Antioch L (1–3 sets)	4	2	0.50	0	4	.500	7	2	2	0.50	17	.882	37	9.25	86	.430	4.5	4.75
44	Spokane L (0–3 sets)	3	1	0.33	0	4	.250	2	0	1	0.00	9	.889	28	9.33	73	.384	2.0	5.23
46	Baton Rouge L (0–3 sets)	3	0	0.00	0	2	.000	3	1	0	0.33	10	1.000	21	7.00	61	.344	2.0	3.29
Total		54	19	0.35	6	89	.146	53	12	41	0.22	190	.784	518	9.59	1179	.439	49.0	5.33

Match		Sets	Block					Dig		Receive
m	opponent/sets	sp	s	a	t	be	blk/s	d	d/s	3	rt	rcv	e	pct	pts	rating
3	Dallas L (1–3 sets)	4	1	2	3	1	0.75	9	2.25	.	.	.	.	.	7.0	4.52
6	Mat-Su L (0–3 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	5	1.67	.	.	.	.	.	2.0	3.48
7	Alton L (0–3 sets)	3	0	2	2	0	0.67	5	1.67	.	.	.	.	.	2.0	6.07
9	Baton Rouge L (0–3 sets)	3	0	4	4	1	1.33	5	1.67	.	.	.	.	.	2.0	5.88
10	Cincinnati L (0–3 sets)	3	0	1	1	0	0.33	3	1.00	.	.	.	.	.	2.5	3.34
11	Schenectady W (3–0 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	4	1.33	.	.	.	.	.	3.0	6.30
13	Burlington L (0–3 sets)	3	0	3	3	0	1.00	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	2.5	3.22
17	Merritt Island L (0–3 sets)	3	0	1	1	0	0.33	2	0.67	.	.	.	.	.	2.5	2.90
22	Tucson L (0–3 sets)	3	0	3	3	0	1.00	3	1.00	.	.	.	.	.	2.5	8.54
25	Kentucky W (3–0 sets)	3	0	1	1	0	0.33	4	1.33	.	.	.	.	.	2.5	7.16
31	Albuquerque L (1–3 sets)	4	1	2	3	0	0.75	7	1.75	.	.	.	.	.	4.0	6.17
34	Mendon W (3–1 sets)	4	0	3	3	0	0.75	9	2.25	.	.	.	.	.	2.5	7.95
39	Sheboygan W (3–2 sets)	5	0	5	5	0	1.00	2	0.40	.	.	.	.	.	5.5	6.46
41	Antioch L (1–3 sets)	4	0	1	1	0	0.25	3	0.75	.	.	.	.	.	4.5	4.75
44	Spokane L (0–3 sets)	3	0	2	2	0	0.67	3	1.00	.	.	.	.	.	2.0	5.23
46	Baton Rouge L (0–3 sets)	3	0	2	2	0	0.67	3	1.00	.	.	.	.	.	2.0	3.29
Total		54	2	32	34	2	0.63	67	1.24	.	.	.	.	.	49.0	5.33