Players

Match		Sets	Attack					Serve						Set
m	opponent/sets	sp	k	k/s	e	ta	pct	pts	sa	se	sa/s	ta	pct	a	a/s	ta	pct	pts	rating
1	Sheboygan W (3–0 sets)	3	5	1.67	1	7	.571	7	0	0	0.00	15	1.000	27	9.00	65	.415	7.0	6.60
3	Pekin W (3–2 sets)	5	1	0.20	0	5	.200	8	3	3	0.60	20	.850	40	8.00	106	.377	5.5	4.88
4	Mendon W (3–1 sets)	4	1	0.25	0	2	.500	6	1	3	0.25	18	.833	48	12.00	104	.462	4.0	8.12
6	Carlsbad L (0–3 sets)	3	1	0.33	1	3	.000	0	0	1	0.00	7	.857	28	9.33	64	.438	1.0	3.64
7	Spokane L (0–3 sets)	3	0	0.00	1	5	-.200	5	1	1	0.33	12	.917	32	10.67	72	.444	1.0	5.04
9	Kentucky W (3–2 sets)	5	1	0.20	0	4	.250	6	2	6	0.40	20	.700	41	8.20	101	.406	4.0	4.20
10	Sheboygan W (3–0 sets)	3	1	0.33	0	4	.250	11	3	3	1.00	17	.824	41	13.67	73	.562	5.0	9.94
12	Tucson L (1–3 sets)	4	0	0.00	1	6	-.167	5	0	3	0.00	17	.824	52	13.00	106	.491	1.0	8.10
13	Mendon L (0–3 sets)	3	1	0.33	0	1	1.000	1	0	0	0.00	8	1.000	23	7.67	76	.303	2.5	4.02
15	Ames L (0–3 sets)	3	1	0.33	0	4	.250	7	1	2	0.33	15	.867	28	9.33	64	.438	2.0	5.58
17	Antioch L (1–3 sets)	4	1	0.25	1	6	.000	3	1	3	0.25	12	.750	42	10.50	87	.483	3.5	5.78
19	Cincinnati L (0–3 sets)	3	0	0.00	0	4	.000	4	1	1	0.33	10	.900	24	8.00	67	.358	2.5	4.02
21	Carlsbad L (0–3 sets)	3	3	1.00	0	4	.750	1	0	3	0.00	9	.667	26	8.67	65	.400	4.0	4.16
25	Kentucky L (0–3 sets)	3	0	0.00	0	2	.000	8	1	0	0.33	17	1.000	30	10.00	65	.462	1.5	5.32
29	Spokane L (0–3 sets)	3	1	0.33	0	5	.200	1	0	0	0.00	8	1.000	31	10.33	72	.431	1.0	4.60
33	Dallas L (0–3 sets)	3	1	0.33	0	3	.333	9	1	0	0.33	17	1.000	27	9.00	69	.391	2.5	5.07
34	Alton L (0–3 sets)	3	2	0.67	0	5	.400	3	0	0	0.00	11	1.000	36	12.00	62	.581	2.0	6.38
44	Cincinnati L (0–3 sets)	3	1	0.33	2	5	-.200	1	0	1	0.00	8	.875	28	9.33	59	.475	1.0	3.64
Total		61	21	0.34	7	75	.187	86	15	30	0.25	241	.876	604	9.90	1377	.439	51.0	5.51

Match		Sets	Block					Dig		Receive
m	opponent/sets	sp	s	a	t	be	blk/s	d	d/s	3	rt	rcv	e	pct	pts	rating
1	Sheboygan W (3–0 sets)	3	0	4	4	0	1.33	4	1.33	.	.	.	.	.	7.0	6.60
3	Pekin W (3–2 sets)	5	0	3	3	0	0.60	12	2.40	.	.	.	.	.	5.5	4.88
4	Mendon W (3–1 sets)	4	0	4	4	1	1.00	6	1.50	.	.	.	.	.	4.0	8.12
6	Carlsbad L (0–3 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	1.0	3.64
7	Spokane L (0–3 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	3	1.00	.	.	.	.	.	1.0	5.04
9	Kentucky W (3–2 sets)	5	0	2	2	0	0.40	9	1.80	.	.	.	.	.	4.0	4.20
10	Sheboygan W (3–0 sets)	3	0	2	2	0	0.67	4	1.33	.	.	.	.	.	5.0	9.94
12	Tucson L (1–3 sets)	4	0	2	2	0	0.50	5	1.25	.	.	.	.	.	1.0	8.10
13	Mendon L (0–3 sets)	3	0	3	3	0	1.00	2	0.67	.	.	.	.	.	2.5	4.02
15	Ames L (0–3 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	7	2.33	.	.	.	.	.	2.0	5.58
17	Antioch L (1–3 sets)	4	0	3	3	1	0.75	4	1.00	.	.	.	.	.	3.5	5.78
19	Cincinnati L (0–3 sets)	3	0	3	3	1	1.00	1	0.33	.	.	.	.	.	2.5	4.02
21	Carlsbad L (0–3 sets)	3	1	0	1	1	0.33	2	0.67	.	.	.	.	.	4.0	4.16
25	Kentucky L (0–3 sets)	3	0	1	1	0	0.33	3	1.00	.	.	.	.	.	1.5	5.32
29	Spokane L (0–3 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	3	1.00	.	.	.	.	.	1.0	4.60
33	Dallas L (0–3 sets)	3	0	1	1	0	0.33	2	0.67	.	.	.	.	.	2.5	5.07
34	Alton L (0–3 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	1	0.33	.	.	.	.	.	2.0	6.38
44	Cincinnati L (0–3 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	1.0	3.64
Total		61	1	28	29	6	0.48	68	1.11	.	.	.	.	.	51.0	5.51