Players

Match		Sets	Attack					Serve						Set
m	opponent/sets	sp	k	k/s	e	ta	pct	pts	sa	se	sa/s	ta	pct	a	a/s	ta	pct	pts	rating
1	Pekin L (0–3 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	2	0.67	3	.667	0.0	5.98
2	Arlington L (0–3 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	4	0	2	0.00	8	.750	1	0.33	6	.167	0.0	4.63
3	Sheboygan W (3–0 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	10	1	4	0.33	15	.733	5	1.67	9	.556	1.0	5.59
10	Pekin L (0–3 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	1	0	0	0.00	7	1.000	0	0.00	2	.000	0.0	4.70
13	Portland L (0–3 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	3	0	3	0.00	10	.700	1	0.33	4	.250	0.0	8.83
15	Manitowoc W (3–0 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	4	1	0	0.33	9	1.000	3	1.00	8	.375	1.0	6.18
18	Spokane L (0–3 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	3	0	3	0.00	9	.667	1	0.33	2	.500	0.0	3.65
19	Pekin L (0–3 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	2	0	1	0.00	9	.889	2	0.67	3	.667	0.0	5.55
29	Dallas L (0–3 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	2	1	1	0.33	8	.875	0	0.00	2	.000	1.0	5.75
36	Portland W (3–0 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	4	1	0	0.33	8	1.000	3	1.00	4	.750	1.0	6.86
Total		30	.	.	.	.	.	33	4	14	0.13	83	.831	18	0.60	43	.419	4.0	5.77

Match		Sets	Block					Dig		Receive
m	opponent/sets	sp	s	a	t	be	blk/s	d	d/s	3	rt	rcv	e	pct	pts	rating
1	Pekin L (0–3 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	5	1.67	12	2.33	21	2	.905	0.0	5.98
2	Arlington L (0–3 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	4	1.33	10	1.96	24	4	.833	0.0	4.63
3	Sheboygan W (3–0 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	5	1.67	7	2.05	20	1	.950	1.0	5.59
10	Pekin L (0–3 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	4	1.33	13	2.11	28	4	.857	0.0	4.70
13	Portland L (0–3 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	12	4.00	13	2.33	21	1	.952	0.0	8.83
15	Manitowoc W (3–0 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	6	2.00	12	2.24	21	3	.857	1.0	6.18
18	Spokane L (0–3 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	1	0.33	14	2.10	30	3	.900	0.0	3.65
19	Pekin L (0–3 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	6	2.00	15	2.03	31	2	.935	0.0	5.55
29	Dallas L (0–3 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	6	2.00	11	2.12	26	1	.962	1.0	5.75
36	Portland W (3–0 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	9	3.00	10	1.96	23	3	.870	1.0	6.86
Total		30	.	.	.	.	.	58	1.93	117	2.11	245	24	.902	4.0	5.77