Players

Match		Sets	Attack					Serve						Set
m	opponent/sets	sp	k	k/s	e	ta	pct	pts	sa	se	sa/s	ta	pct	a	a/s	ta	pct	pts	rating
1	Baton Rouge L (0–3 sets)	3	4	1.33	4	20	.000	2	0	2	0.00	7	.714	.	.	.	.	4.5	3.86
5	Nashville L (0–3 sets)	3	8	2.67	4	19	.211	1	0	1	0.00	5	.800	.	.	.	.	9.0	4.56
9	Cincinnati L (0–3 sets)	3	8	2.67	7	25	.040	0	0	3	0.00	6	.500	.	.	.	.	9.0	6.20
12	Pekin L (0–3 sets)	3	7	2.33	6	24	.042	3	0	0	0.00	9	1.000	.	.	.	.	7.0	4.48
15	Santa Clara W (3–0 sets)	3	17	5.67	8	35	.257	4	0	5	0.00	10	.500	.	.	.	.	17.0	6.95
18	San Diego L (2–3 sets)	5	18	3.60	3	25	.600	5	2	3	0.40	17	.824	.	.	.	.	21.5	7.16
22	Teutopolis L (0–3 sets)	3	12	4.00	2	22	.455	1	0	2	0.00	8	.750	.	.	.	.	13.5	7.72
26	Arlington L (0–3 sets)	3	10	3.33	7	21	.143	5	0	2	0.00	12	.833	.	.	.	.	11.0	8.49
31	Columbia L (0–3 sets)	3	7	2.33	9	23	-.087	6	0	2	0.00	12	.833	.	.	.	.	7.0	5.53
44	New Orleans L (0–3 sets)	3	2	0.67	3	6	-.167	0	0	1	0.00	6	.833	.	.	.	.	4.0	5.51
Total		32	93	2.91	53	220	.182	27	2	21	0.06	92	.772	.	.	.	.	103.5	6.05

Match		Sets	Block					Dig		Receive
m	opponent/sets	sp	s	a	t	be	blk/s	d	d/s	3	rt	rcv	e	pct	pts	rating
1	Baton Rouge L (0–3 sets)	3	0	1	1	0	0.33	1	0.33	.	.	.	.	.	4.5	3.86
5	Nashville L (0–3 sets)	3	1	0	1	0	0.33	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	9.0	4.56
9	Cincinnati L (0–3 sets)	3	0	2	2	0	0.67	3	1.00	.	.	.	.	.	9.0	6.20
12	Pekin L (0–3 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	4	1.33	.	.	.	.	.	7.0	4.48
15	Santa Clara W (3–0 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	6	2.00	.	.	.	.	.	17.0	6.95
18	San Diego L (2–3 sets)	5	0	3	3	0	0.60	4	0.80	.	.	.	.	.	21.5	7.16
22	Teutopolis L (0–3 sets)	3	0	3	3	1	1.00	1	0.33	.	.	.	.	.	13.5	7.72
26	Arlington L (0–3 sets)	3	0	2	2	0	0.67	5	1.67	.	.	.	.	.	11.0	8.49
31	Columbia L (0–3 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	8	2.67	.	.	.	.	.	7.0	5.53
44	New Orleans L (0–3 sets)	3	0	4	4	1	1.33	1	0.33	.	.	.	.	.	4.0	5.51
Total		32	1	15	16	3	0.50	33	1.03	.	.	.	.	.	103.5	6.05