Players

Match		Sets	Attack					Serve						Set
m	opponent/sets	sp	k	k/s	e	ta	pct	pts	sa	se	sa/s	ta	pct	a	a/s	ta	pct	pts	rating
5	Teutopolis W (3–0 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	4	1	3	0.33	9	.667	1	0.33	4	.250	1.0	4.63
7	Antioch L (1–3 sets)	4	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	0	0.00	4	.000	0.0	3.25
10	Kentucky W (3–2 sets)	5	.	.	.	.	.	8	1	2	0.20	19	.895	7	1.40	13	.538	1.0	5.85
15	Denali L (2–3 sets)	5	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	4	0.80	7	.571	0.0	3.55
18	San Jose L (0–3 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	1	0.33	3	.333	0.0	4.75
21	St. Charles W (3–0 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	1	0	3	0.00	7	.571	0	0.00	1	.000	0.0	6.28
25	Burlington L (1–3 sets)	4	.	.	.	.	.	1	0	2	0.00	10	.800	3	0.75	5	.600	0.0	3.65
29	Antioch L (0–3 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	3	1.00	8	.375	0.0	5.40
34	Baton Rouge W (3–1 sets)	4	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	2	0.50	4	.500	0.0	4.35
45	Burlington L (1–3 sets)	4	.	.	.	.	.	5	0	3	0.00	18	.833	1	0.25	4	.250	0.0	4.58
Total		38	.	.	.	.	.	19	2	13	0.05	63	.794	22	0.58	53	.415	2.0	4.63

Match		Sets	Block					Dig		Receive
m	opponent/sets	sp	s	a	t	be	blk/s	d	d/s	3	rt	rcv	e	pct	pts	rating
5	Teutopolis W (3–0 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	5	1.67	5	1.82	17	2	.882	1.0	4.63
7	Antioch L (1–3 sets)	4	.	.	.	.	.	5	1.25	11	1.83	29	5	.828	0.0	3.25
10	Kentucky W (3–2 sets)	5	.	.	.	.	.	11	2.20	15	2.00	35	2	.943	1.0	5.85
15	Denali L (2–3 sets)	5	.	.	.	.	.	6	1.20	11	1.84	32	5	.844	0.0	3.55
18	San Jose L (0–3 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	4	1.33	15	2.12	26	3	.885	0.0	4.75
21	St. Charles W (3–0 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	9	3.00	6	2.00	14	0	1.000	0.0	6.28
25	Burlington L (1–3 sets)	4	.	.	.	.	.	4	1.00	12	2.04	23	3	.870	0.0	3.65
29	Antioch L (0–3 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	5	1.67	12	2.16	25	1	.960	0.0	5.40
34	Baton Rouge W (3–1 sets)	4	.	.	.	.	.	6	1.50	10	1.96	24	3	.875	0.0	4.35
45	Burlington L (1–3 sets)	4	.	.	.	.	.	5	1.25	16	2.28	32	1	.969	0.0	4.58
Total		38	.	.	.	.	.	60	1.58	113	2.01	257	25	.903	2.0	4.63