Players

Nehemiah Rose 5 Middle Blocker (MB)
Player Skills
SERVING	RECEIVING	BLOCKING	ATTACKING	DEFENSE	SETTING
13	-	13	13	8	-

Match		Sets	Attack					Serve						Set
m	opponent/sets	sp	k	k/s	e	ta	pct	pts	sa	se	sa/s	ta	pct	a	a/s	ta	pct	pts	rating
1	Sheboygan W (3–2 sets)	5	11	2.20	1	17	.588	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	13.0	6.07
3	St. Charles W (3–1 sets)	4	5	1.25	2	8	.375	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	8.5	5.28
4	Baton Rouge W (3–2 sets)	5	2	0.40	3	11	-.091	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	4.0	4.14
6	Antioch L (2–3 sets)	5	5	1.00	1	9	.444	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	10.0	5.94
7	Teutopolis W (3–0 sets)	3	9	3.00	0	11	.818	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	12.5	9.05
10	Santa Clara W (3–0 sets)	3	7	2.33	7	19	.000	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	10.5	8.88
11	Schenectady L (2–3 sets)	5	8	1.60	3	19	.263	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	8.0	3.00
12	Sheboygan W (3–1 sets)	4	4	1.00	1	12	.250	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	7.0	5.78
14	Santa Clara W (3–0 sets)	3	3	1.00	3	9	.000	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	4.5	4.08
15	Baton Rouge W (3–1 sets)	4	5	1.25	4	9	.111	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	8.0	5.87
19	Santa Clara W (3–0 sets)	3	4	1.33	1	7	.429	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	7.0	5.38
20	Pekin W (3–0 sets)	3	4	1.33	1	10	.300	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	5.0	5.00
21	Albuquerque W (3–2 sets)	5	9	1.80	6	22	.136	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	12.0	5.75
23	New Orleans W (3–0 sets)	3	8	2.67	1	11	.636	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	12.0	10.00
25	Pekin W (3–1 sets)	4	5	1.25	4	12	.083	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	9.0	6.02
28	Sheboygan W (3–1 sets)	4	9	2.25	3	14	.429	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	13.0	7.68
29	Mendon W (3–2 sets)	5	8	1.60	1	11	.636	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	14.0	8.16
32	Teutopolis L (1–3 sets)	4	3	0.75	2	11	.091	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	5.0	2.82
34	Mendon W (3–2 sets)	5	5	1.00	2	10	.300	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	8.0	4.43
35	Teutopolis W (3–0 sets)	3	4	1.33	1	6	.500	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	6.0	7.29
Total		80	118	1.48	47	238	.298	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	177.0	6.03

Match		Sets	Block					Dig		Receive
m	opponent/sets	sp	s	a	t	be	blk/s	d	d/s	3	rt	rcv	e	pct	pts	rating
1	Sheboygan W (3–2 sets)	5	1	2	3	0	0.60	1	0.20	.	.	.	.	.	13.0	6.07
3	St. Charles W (3–1 sets)	4	0	3	3	1	0.75	1	0.25	.	.	.	.	.	8.5	5.28
4	Baton Rouge W (3–2 sets)	5	0	4	4	0	0.80	2	0.40	.	.	.	.	.	4.0	4.14
6	Antioch L (2–3 sets)	5	1	6	7	0	1.40	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	10.0	5.94
7	Teutopolis W (3–0 sets)	3	1	5	6	0	2.00	1	0.33	.	.	.	.	.	12.5	9.05
10	Santa Clara W (3–0 sets)	3	0	5	5	0	1.67	4	1.33	.	.	.	.	.	10.5	8.88
11	Schenectady L (2–3 sets)	5	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	8.0	3.00
12	Sheboygan W (3–1 sets)	4	0	4	4	1	1.00	1	0.25	.	.	.	.	.	7.0	5.78
14	Santa Clara W (3–0 sets)	3	0	1	1	1	0.33	2	0.67	.	.	.	.	.	4.5	4.08
15	Baton Rouge W (3–1 sets)	4	0	4	4	1	1.00	2	0.50	.	.	.	.	.	8.0	5.87
19	Santa Clara W (3–0 sets)	3	0	2	2	0	0.67	3	1.00	.	.	.	.	.	7.0	5.38
20	Pekin W (3–0 sets)	3	0	2	2	1	0.67	1	0.33	.	.	.	.	.	5.0	5.00
21	Albuquerque W (3–2 sets)	5	0	4	4	1	0.80	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	12.0	5.75
23	New Orleans W (3–0 sets)	3	0	6	6	0	2.00	1	0.33	.	.	.	.	.	12.0	10.00
25	Pekin W (3–1 sets)	4	0	4	4	0	1.00	2	0.50	.	.	.	.	.	9.0	6.02
28	Sheboygan W (3–1 sets)	4	1	4	5	0	1.25	1	0.25	.	.	.	.	.	13.0	7.68
29	Mendon W (3–2 sets)	5	1	8	9	2	1.80	4	0.80	.	.	.	.	.	14.0	8.16
32	Teutopolis L (1–3 sets)	4	1	0	1	1	0.25	4	1.00	.	.	.	.	.	5.0	2.82
34	Mendon W (3–2 sets)	5	2	2	4	0	0.80	1	0.20	.	.	.	.	.	8.0	4.43
35	Teutopolis W (3–0 sets)	3	0	4	4	1	1.33	4	1.33	.	.	.	.	.	6.0	7.29
Total		80	8	70	78	11	0.98	35	0.44	.	.	.	.	.	177.0	6.03