Players

MSWL UNITED MSWL U2 TMVL
Friday, May 1st, 2026 - 09:33:56 AM (gmt)

TMVL Season 17 // Landing

Logo

Donate ELO Ranking Honor Roll NET Ranking Stats Leaders Teams Of The Week Wall

If you'd like to join please click this link and add your name to the waitlist.

PAC 8 Conference

SEC Conference

BIG 8 Conference

Big East Conference

Dylan Campbell 5 Middle Blocker (MB)
Player Skills
SERVING	RECEIVING	BLOCKING	ATTACKING	DEFENSE	SETTING
15	-	17	16	13	-

Season 11 Totals
KILLS	ATK PCT	ACES	DIGS	BLOCKS
88 219th	.340 169th	15 157th	19 361st	44 166th

Career Honors

S132nd All-BIG-EAST

Match Statistics - OFFENSE (Season 11)

Match		Sets	Attack					Serve						Set
m	opponent/sets	sp	k	k/s	e	ta	pct	pts	sa	se	sa/s	ta	pct	a	a/s	ta	pct	pts	rating
2	Cincinnati L (0–3 sets)	3	5	1.67	4	9	.111	4	1	0	0.33	10	1.000	.	.	.	.	8.0	7.24
3	Quincy L (2–3 sets)	5	12	2.40	7	21	.238	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	16.5	8.07
5	Manitowoc W (3–2 sets)	5	9	1.80	4	18	.278	8	1	4	0.20	21	.810	.	.	.	.	12.0	6.55
9	Antioch L (0–3 sets)	3	4	1.33	1	7	.429	0	0	0	0.00	6	1.000	.	.	.	.	4.0	2.24
12	Ames L (0–3 sets)	3	2	0.67	2	5	.000	1	1	2	0.33	7	.714	.	.	.	.	4.5	4.18
15	Columbia W (3–2 sets)	5	10	2.00	3	18	.389	6	1	4	0.20	18	.778	.	.	.	.	12.0	5.22
18	Dallas L (0–3 sets)	3	3	1.00	1	5	.400	2	1	1	0.33	10	.900	.	.	.	.	5.5	5.02
21	Mat-Su W (3–1 sets)	4	9	2.25	1	13	.615	7	2	4	0.50	19	.789	.	.	.	.	15.0	9.29
29	Spokane W (3–2 sets)	5	15	3.00	2	20	.650	8	3	1	0.60	19	.947	.	.	.	.	19.0	6.48
34	Burlington L (0–3 sets)	3	5	1.67	1	7	.571	4	1	2	0.33	12	.833	.	.	.	.	7.0	5.37
39	Manitowoc L (2–3 sets)	5	9	1.80	6	19	.158	10	4	3	0.80	19	.842	.	.	.	.	15.5	7.12
40	Tucson W (3–0 sets)	3	5	1.67	4	11	.091	5	0	1	0.00	12	.917	.	.	.	.	6.5	6.67
Total		47	88	1.87	36	153	.340	55	15	22	0.32	153	.856	.	.	.	.	125.5	6.12

Match Statistics - DEFENSE (Season 11)

Match		Sets	Block					Dig		Receive
m	opponent/sets	sp	s	a	t	be	blk/s	d	d/s	3	rt	rcv	e	pct	pts	rating
2	Cincinnati L (0–3 sets)	3	0	4	4	0	1.33	2	0.67	.	.	.	.	.	8.0	7.24
3	Quincy L (2–3 sets)	5	0	9	9	0	1.80	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	16.5	8.07
5	Manitowoc W (3–2 sets)	5	0	4	4	0	0.80	4	0.80	.	.	.	.	.	12.0	6.55
9	Antioch L (0–3 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	2	0.67	.	.	.	.	.	4.0	2.24
12	Ames L (0–3 sets)	3	0	3	3	1	1.00	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	4.5	4.18
15	Columbia W (3–2 sets)	5	0	2	2	0	0.40	3	0.60	.	.	.	.	.	12.0	5.22
18	Dallas L (0–3 sets)	3	0	3	3	1	1.00	2	0.67	.	.	.	.	.	5.5	5.02
21	Mat-Su W (3–1 sets)	4	1	6	7	1	1.75	1	0.25	.	.	.	.	.	15.0	9.29
29	Spokane W (3–2 sets)	5	0	2	2	0	0.40	1	0.20	.	.	.	.	.	19.0	6.48
34	Burlington L (0–3 sets)	3	0	2	2	0	0.67	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	7.0	5.37
39	Manitowoc L (2–3 sets)	5	0	5	5	0	1.00	2	0.40	.	.	.	.	.	15.5	7.12
40	Tucson W (3–0 sets)	3	0	3	3	0	1.00	2	0.67	.	.	.	.	.	6.5	6.67
Total		47	1	43	44	3	0.94	19	0.40	.	.	.	.	.	125.5	6.12