Players

Kyle McCracken 5 Libero (L)
Player Skills
SERVING	RECEIVING	BLOCKING	ATTACKING	DEFENSE	SETTING
17	16	-	-	17	14

Season 12 Totals
DIGS	RCV RT	RCV PCT	ASSISTS	ACES
166 8th	2.30 38th	.943 49th	99 71st	39 15th

Career Honors

S112nd All-BIG-8

S133rd All-TMVL1st All-BIG-8

Match Statistics - OFFENSE (Season 12)

Match		Sets	Attack					Serve						Set
m	opponent/sets	sp	k	k/s	e	ta	pct	pts	sa	se	sa/s	ta	pct	a	a/s	ta	pct	pts	rating
2	Pekin L (1–3 sets)	4	.	.	.	.	.	1	1	2	0.25	9	.778	2	0.50	4	.500	1.0	5.12
3	Schenectady W (3–0 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	4	0	2	0.00	11	.818	6	2.00	9	.667	0.0	7.02
4	Dallas L (1–3 sets)	4	.	.	.	.	.	7	2	2	0.50	18	.889	5	1.25	10	.500	2.0	6.73
5	Ames W (3–0 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	8	1	0	0.33	15	1.000	6	2.00	7	.857	1.0	5.37
7	St. Charles W (3–0 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	11	2	1	0.67	16	.938	8	2.67	9	.889	2.0	9.04
9	Mat-Su W (3–0 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	5	0	2	0.00	13	.846	4	1.33	4	1.000	0.0	8.34
11	Pekin L (0–3 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	3	2	2	0.67	13	.846	1	0.33	1	1.000	2.0	6.58
12	Starkville W (3–2 sets)	5	.	.	.	.	.	13	2	4	0.40	28	.857	2	0.40	4	.500	2.0	6.56
13	Dallas W (3–0 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	5	2	3	0.67	13	.769	2	0.67	4	.500	2.0	5.23
16	Tucson W (3–0 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	7	3	1	1.00	13	.923	3	1.00	3	1.000	3.0	9.91
18	Cincinnati L (0–3 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	3	2	0	0.67	11	1.000	2	0.67	5	.400	2.0	3.30
20	Denali W (3–0 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	9	3	1	1.00	18	.944	3	1.00	3	1.000	3.0	5.89
23	St. Charles W (3–0 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	3	2	1	0.67	12	.917	8	2.67	8	1.000	2.0	6.95
24	Burlington W (3–0 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	9	2	2	0.67	17	.882	3	1.00	5	.600	2.0	6.79
27	Pekin L (1–3 sets)	4	.	.	.	.	.	4	1	1	0.25	14	.929	0	0.00	2	.000	1.0	3.50
28	New Orleans W (3–0 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	1	1	3	0.33	9	.667	1	0.33	1	1.000	1.0	3.95
31	Carlsbad W (3–1 sets)	4	.	.	.	.	.	12	1	1	0.25	22	.955	4	1.00	5	.800	1.0	8.60
32	Mendon W (3–0 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	9	2	2	0.67	17	.882	5	1.67	5	1.000	2.0	6.47
34	Portland L (0–3 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	5	1	2	0.33	13	.846	7	2.33	8	.875	1.0	5.96
37	Cincinnati W (3–0 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	5	1	2	0.33	13	.846	3	1.00	6	.500	1.0	6.68
41	Starkville L (2–3 sets)	5	.	.	.	.	.	3	1	2	0.20	14	.857	5	1.00	8	.625	1.0	6.50
42	Alton W (3–2 sets)	5	.	.	.	.	.	6	2	2	0.40	18	.889	4	0.80	6	.667	2.0	6.55
44	Quincy W (3–2 sets)	5	.	.	.	.	.	7	2	1	0.40	21	.952	5	1.00	7	.714	2.0	3.93
46	Kentucky W (3–0 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	3	0	0	0.00	10	1.000	4	1.33	7	.571	0.0	7.99
47	Pekin W (3–2 sets)	5	.	.	.	.	.	8	3	1	0.60	21	.952	6	1.20	9	.667	3.0	6.25
Total		89	.	.	.	.	.	151	39	40	0.44	379	.894	99	1.11	140	.707	39.0	6.37

Match Statistics - DEFENSE (Season 12)

Match		Sets	Block					Dig		Receive
m	opponent/sets	sp	s	a	t	be	blk/s	d	d/s	3	rt	rcv	e	pct	pts	rating
2	Pekin L (1–3 sets)	4	.	.	.	.	.	5	1.25	16	2.33	24	1	.958	1.0	5.12
3	Schenectady W (3–0 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	9	3.00	4	2.00	11	0	1.000	0.0	7.02
4	Dallas L (1–3 sets)	4	.	.	.	.	.	10	2.50	9	2.25	16	1	.938	2.0	6.73
5	Ames W (3–0 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	3	1.00	5	2.33	12	0	1.000	1.0	5.37
7	St. Charles W (3–0 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	13	4.33	4	2.25	12	0	1.000	2.0	9.04
9	Mat-Su W (3–0 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	6	2.00	11	2.56	16	0	1.000	0.0	8.34
11	Pekin L (0–3 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	4	1.33	11	2.47	17	0	1.000	2.0	6.58
12	Starkville W (3–2 sets)	5	.	.	.	.	.	7	1.40	11	2.44	18	1	.944	2.0	6.56
13	Dallas W (3–0 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	4	1.33	6	2.22	9	1	.889	2.0	5.23
16	Tucson W (3–0 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	11	3.67	8	2.47	15	0	1.000	3.0	9.91
18	Cincinnati L (0–3 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	3	1.00	8	1.94	17	2	.882	2.0	3.30
20	Denali W (3–0 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	4	1.33	7	2.31	13	1	.923	3.0	5.89
23	St. Charles W (3–0 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	3	1.00	6	2.75	8	0	1.000	2.0	6.95
24	Burlington W (3–0 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	7	2.33	5	2.30	10	0	1.000	2.0	6.79
27	Pekin L (1–3 sets)	4	.	.	.	.	.	3	0.75	8	2.19	16	2	.875	1.0	3.50
28	New Orleans W (3–0 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	1	0.33	9	2.31	16	1	.938	1.0	3.95
31	Carlsbad W (3–1 sets)	4	.	.	.	.	.	13	3.25	10	2.35	17	0	1.000	1.0	8.60
32	Mendon W (3–0 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	7	2.33	9	2.21	14	2	.857	2.0	6.47
34	Portland L (0–3 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	5	1.67	6	2.09	11	1	.909	1.0	5.96
37	Cincinnati W (3–0 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	5	1.67	11	2.38	16	1	.938	1.0	6.68
41	Starkville L (2–3 sets)	5	.	.	.	.	.	7	1.40	5	2.44	9	0	1.000	1.0	6.50
42	Alton W (3–2 sets)	5	.	.	.	.	.	10	2.00	17	2.32	28	2	.929	2.0	6.55
44	Quincy W (3–2 sets)	5	.	.	.	.	.	12	2.40	1	1.22	9	4	.556	2.0	3.93
46	Kentucky W (3–0 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	9	3.00	7	2.33	12	0	1.000	0.0	7.99
47	Pekin W (3–2 sets)	5	.	.	.	.	.	5	1.00	13	2.48	21	1	.952	3.0	6.25
Total		89	.	.	.	.	.	166	1.87	207	2.30	367	21	.943	39.0	6.37