Players

Colton Stice 5 Outside Hitter (OH)
Player Skills
SERVING	RECEIVING	BLOCKING	ATTACKING	DEFENSE	SETTING
17	16	15	16	15	10

Season 11 Totals
KILLS	ATK PCT	ACES	DIGS	BLOCKS
296 26th	.405 121st	20 105th	89 80th	63 76th

Career Honors

S132nd All-SEC

Match Statistics - OFFENSE (Season 11)

Match		Sets	Attack					Serve						Set
m	opponent/sets	sp	k	k/s	e	ta	pct	pts	sa	se	sa/s	ta	pct	a	a/s	ta	pct	pts	rating
4	Baton Rouge L (0–3 sets)	3	7	2.33	3	16	.250	1	0	1	0.00	7	.857	0	0.00	1	.000	8.0	5.39
6	Portland L (2–3 sets)	5	24	4.80	10	43	.326	3	0	3	0.00	14	.786	0	0.00	1	.000	26.0	8.89
7	Nashville L (0–3 sets)	3	15	5.00	5	27	.370	2	0	2	0.00	9	.778	.	.	.	.	15.0	6.81
8	Antioch W (3–0 sets)	3	15	5.00	3	24	.500	3	0	2	0.00	9	.778	.	.	.	.	15.5	8.23
10	Teutopolis L (1–3 sets)	4	9	2.25	5	20	.200	3	1	4	0.25	12	.667	1	0.25	1	1.000	10.0	3.50
12	Carlsbad W (3–2 sets)	5	15	3.00	4	28	.393	6	1	2	0.20	16	.875	1	0.20	2	.500	19.0	6.81
13	Baton Rouge W (3–0 sets)	3	10	3.33	1	13	.692	3	0	1	0.00	9	.889	.	.	.	.	12.0	6.21
15	Tucson L (2–3 sets)	5	20	4.00	8	34	.353	8	5	5	1.00	22	.773	.	.	.	.	28.5	8.63
18	San Jose L (2–3 sets)	5	27	5.40	9	42	.429	5	1	1	0.20	17	.941	0	0.00	1	.000	30.5	8.71
19	Teutopolis W (3–0 sets)	3	9	3.00	0	13	.692	4	1	4	0.33	10	.600	.	.	.	.	11.0	6.32
21	Quincy W (3–1 sets)	4	13	3.25	6	27	.259	6	2	4	0.50	17	.765	.	.	.	.	17.5	6.97
22	Burlington L (0–3 sets)	3	10	3.33	2	17	.471	1	0	0	0.00	9	1.000	0	0.00	1	.000	10.5	6.74
25	Cincinnati W (3–1 sets)	4	17	4.25	2	29	.517	3	2	0	0.50	12	1.000	.	.	.	.	21.0	7.23
26	Pekin L (2–3 sets)	5	18	3.60	6	32	.375	7	1	1	0.20	17	.941	0	0.00	1	.000	19.5	6.99
29	Nashville W (3–1 sets)	4	17	4.25	4	28	.464	5	1	0	0.25	15	1.000	.	.	.	.	21.5	8.99
31	St. Charles L (0–3 sets)	3	12	4.00	2	21	.476	2	1	2	0.33	9	.778	.	.	.	.	14.0	5.77
34	Antioch L (2–3 sets)	5	16	3.20	5	24	.458	2	1	1	0.20	11	.909	1	0.20	1	1.000	19.5	6.14
39	Starkville W (3–1 sets)	4	13	3.25	4	18	.500	9	2	3	0.50	19	.842	1	0.25	1	1.000	15.5	6.55
41	Merritt Island W (3–2 sets)	5	13	2.60	8	26	.192	6	1	1	0.20	16	.938	1	0.20	1	1.000	16.0	5.87
46	San Jose L (2–3 sets)	5	16	3.20	4	24	.500	4	0	3	0.00	14	.786	0	0.00	1	.000	18.0	7.36
Total		81	296	3.65	91	506	.405	83	20	40	0.25	264	.848	5	0.06	12	.417	348.5	6.91

Match Statistics - DEFENSE (Season 11)

Match		Sets	Block					Dig		Receive
m	opponent/sets	sp	s	a	t	be	blk/s	d	d/s	3	rt	rcv	e	pct	pts	rating
4	Baton Rouge L (0–3 sets)	3	0	2	2	0	0.67	1	0.33	12	2.53	19	0	1.000	8.0	5.39
6	Portland L (2–3 sets)	5	0	4	4	0	0.80	15	3.00	12	2.35	20	1	.950	26.0	8.89
7	Nashville L (0–3 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	1	0.33	16	2.09	32	3	.906	15.0	6.81
8	Antioch W (3–0 sets)	3	0	1	1	0	0.33	4	1.33	14	2.27	26	1	.962	15.5	8.23
10	Teutopolis L (1–3 sets)	4	.	.	.	.	.	4	1.00	10	1.87	30	5	.833	10.0	3.50
12	Carlsbad W (3–2 sets)	5	1	4	5	0	1.00	8	1.60	17	2.11	36	3	.917	19.0	6.81
13	Baton Rouge W (3–0 sets)	3	0	4	4	0	1.33	5	1.67	3	1.80	10	1	.900	12.0	6.21
15	Tucson L (2–3 sets)	5	1	5	6	0	1.20	7	1.40	23	2.33	43	0	1.000	28.5	8.63
18	San Jose L (2–3 sets)	5	0	5	5	1	1.00	5	1.00	16	2.29	34	0	1.000	30.5	8.71
19	Teutopolis W (3–0 sets)	3	0	2	2	0	0.67	1	0.33	10	2.17	18	3	.833	11.0	6.32
21	Quincy W (3–1 sets)	4	0	5	5	0	1.25	5	1.25	9	2.05	21	2	.905	17.5	6.97
22	Burlington L (0–3 sets)	3	0	1	1	0	0.33	2	0.67	16	2.52	23	1	.957	10.5	6.74
25	Cincinnati W (3–1 sets)	4	0	4	4	0	1.00	3	0.75	11	2.00	26	2	.923	21.0	7.23
26	Pekin L (2–3 sets)	5	0	1	1	0	0.20	4	0.80	19	2.18	39	2	.949	19.5	6.99
29	Nashville W (3–1 sets)	4	0	7	7	0	1.75	8	2.00	21	2.30	37	2	.946	21.5	8.99
31	St. Charles L (0–3 sets)	3	0	2	2	0	0.67	2	0.67	8	1.73	22	5	.773	14.0	5.77
34	Antioch L (2–3 sets)	5	0	5	5	3	1.00	4	0.80	19	2.09	44	4	.909	19.5	6.14
39	Starkville W (3–1 sets)	4	0	1	1	1	0.25	1	0.25	13	2.16	31	1	.968	15.5	6.55
41	Merritt Island W (3–2 sets)	5	0	4	4	0	0.80	3	0.60	16	2.23	30	2	.933	16.0	5.87
46	San Jose L (2–3 sets)	5	0	4	4	0	0.80	6	1.20	27	2.51	37	2	.946	18.0	7.36
Total		81	2	61	63	5	0.78	89	1.10	292	2.19	578	40	.931	348.5	6.91