Players

Career Honors

S132nd All-BIG-EAST

Match		Sets	Attack					Serve						Set
m	opponent/sets	sp	k	k/s	e	ta	pct	pts	sa	se	sa/s	ta	pct	a	a/s	ta	pct	pts	rating
1	Burlington L (2–3 sets)	5	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	3	0.60	7	.429	0.0	4.85
3	Columbia L (0–3 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	2	0.67	3	.667	0.0	5.75
4	Alton L (0–3 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	3	1.00	6	.500	0.0	6.98
5	Sheboygan W (3–0 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	4	1.33	5	.800	0.0	7.51
7	Mendon W (3–2 sets)	5	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	6	1.20	9	.667	0.0	8.37
8	Cincinnati L (1–3 sets)	4	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	2	0.50	6	.333	0.0	5.70
10	Burlington W (3–0 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	4	1.33	5	.800	0.0	7.73
11	Manitowoc W (3–0 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	4	1.33	6	.667	0.0	8.97
13	Alton L (0–3 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	4	1.33	5	.800	0.0	4.58
14	Spokane L (1–3 sets)	4	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	1	0.25	6	.167	0.0	4.93
17	Teutopolis W (3–0 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	1	0.33	4	.250	0.0	8.80
18	Dallas W (3–2 sets)	5	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	3	0.60	4	.750	0.0	6.09
21	San Diego L (0–3 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	2	0.67	3	.667	0.0	5.98
22	New Orleans W (3–2 sets)	5	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	5	1.00	10	.500	0.0	6.98
25	New Orleans W (3–0 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	7	2.33	8	.875	0.0	5.58
26	Mat-Su L (0–3 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	4	1.33	5	.800	0.0	7.17
29	Mendon L (2–3 sets)	5	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	5	1.00	6	.833	0.0	7.76
30	Sheboygan L (0–3 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	4	1.33	6	.667	0.0	6.83
34	Cincinnati W (3–0 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	5	1.67	7	.714	0.0	9.36
35	Tucson W (3–1 sets)	4	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	1	0.25	3	.333	0.0	8.08
39	Sheboygan L (2–3 sets)	5	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	5	1.00	10	.500	0.0	7.43
40	St. Charles L (2–3 sets)	5	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	5	1.00	6	.833	0.0	5.85
44	Spokane L (2–3 sets)	5	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	1	0.20	2	.500	0.0	5.15
45	Nashville L (1–3 sets)	4	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	4	1.00	5	.800	0.0	5.85
Total		92	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	85	0.92	137	.620	0.0	6.76

Match		Sets	Block					Dig		Receive
m	opponent/sets	sp	s	a	t	be	blk/s	d	d/s	3	rt	rcv	e	pct	pts	rating
1	Burlington L (2–3 sets)	5	.	.	.	.	.	7	1.40	17	2.24	29	2	.931	0.0	4.85
3	Columbia L (0–3 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	7	2.33	17	2.19	32	3	.906	0.0	5.75
4	Alton L (0–3 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	4	1.33	9	2.54	13	1	.923	0.0	6.98
5	Sheboygan W (3–0 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	4	1.33	3	3.00	3	0	1.000	0.0	7.51
7	Mendon W (3–2 sets)	5	.	.	.	.	.	12	2.40	14	2.78	18	0	1.000	0.0	8.37
8	Cincinnati L (1–3 sets)	4	.	.	.	.	.	9	2.25	13	2.29	21	2	.905	0.0	5.70
10	Burlington W (3–0 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	10	3.33	3	2.29	7	0	1.000	0.0	7.73
11	Manitowoc W (3–0 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	8	2.67	6	2.63	8	0	1.000	0.0	8.97
13	Alton L (0–3 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	4	1.33	4	2.00	16	0	1.000	0.0	4.58
14	Spokane L (1–3 sets)	4	.	.	.	.	.	3	0.75	16	2.46	26	1	.962	0.0	4.93
17	Teutopolis W (3–0 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	12	4.00	6	2.36	11	0	1.000	0.0	8.80
18	Dallas W (3–2 sets)	5	.	.	.	.	.	5	1.00	14	2.57	21	0	1.000	0.0	6.09
21	San Diego L (0–3 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	9	2.73	11	0	1.000	0.0	5.98
22	New Orleans W (3–2 sets)	5	.	.	.	.	.	15	3.00	7	2.23	13	1	.923	0.0	6.98
25	New Orleans W (3–0 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	6	2.00	2	2.00	8	1	.875	0.0	5.58
26	Mat-Su L (0–3 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	4	1.33	8	2.58	12	0	1.000	0.0	7.17
29	Mendon L (2–3 sets)	5	.	.	.	.	.	11	2.20	11	2.53	15	1	.933	0.0	7.76
30	Sheboygan L (0–3 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	5	1.67	9	2.43	14	1	.929	0.0	6.83
34	Cincinnati W (3–0 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	10	3.33	6	2.45	11	0	1.000	0.0	9.36
35	Tucson W (3–1 sets)	4	.	.	.	.	.	11	2.75	12	2.50	16	1	.938	0.0	8.08
39	Sheboygan L (2–3 sets)	5	.	.	.	.	.	8	1.60	11	2.56	18	0	1.000	0.0	7.43
40	St. Charles L (2–3 sets)	5	.	.	.	.	.	9	1.80	15	2.14	29	1	.966	0.0	5.85
44	Spokane L (2–3 sets)	5	.	.	.	.	.	8	1.60	10	2.28	18	1	.944	0.0	5.15
45	Nashville L (1–3 sets)	4	.	.	.	.	.	9	2.25	9	2.16	19	0	1.000	0.0	5.85
Total		92	.	.	.	.	.	181	1.97	231	2.37	389	16	.959	0.0	6.76