Players

Leonard McCoy 5 Outside Hitter (OH)
Player Skills
SERVING	RECEIVING	BLOCKING	ATTACKING	DEFENSE	SETTING
17	17	15	17	15	8

Match		Sets	Attack					Serve						Set
m	opponent/sets	sp	k	k/s	e	ta	pct	pts	sa	se	sa/s	ta	pct	a	a/s	ta	pct	pts	rating
1	Schenectady W (3–0 sets)	3	9	3.00	2	14	.500	5	1	1	0.33	11	.909	1	0.33	2	.500	12.0	6.27
2	Cincinnati L (0–3 sets)	3	4	1.33	9	31	-.161	3	0	0	0.00	9	1.000	.	.	.	.	5.0	3.24
5	Manitowoc W (3–0 sets)	3	8	2.67	1	16	.438	3	0	2	0.00	7	.714	.	.	.	.	9.0	5.05
6	Carlsbad W (3–1 sets)	4	9	2.25	4	15	.333	5	0	3	0.00	14	.786	1	0.25	1	1.000	10.0	4.83
8	Spokane L (0–3 sets)	3	17	5.67	6	32	.344	3	0	0	0.00	8	1.000	0	0.00	1	.000	19.0	7.47
9	Kentucky W (3–0 sets)	3	2	0.67	2	8	.000	8	0	2	0.00	12	.833	.	.	.	.	3.5	5.27
10	Schenectady L (1–3 sets)	4	6	1.50	2	15	.267	0	0	2	0.00	10	.800	.	.	.	.	7.0	2.70
11	Cincinnati L (2–3 sets)	5	23	4.60	8	35	.429	3	3	2	0.60	16	.875	1	0.20	2	.500	27.5	7.46
13	Sheboygan W (3–1 sets)	4	23	5.75	5	36	.500	5	1	1	0.25	14	.929	.	.	.	.	25.5	8.35
14	Mendon L (1–3 sets)	4	14	3.50	4	28	.357	5	0	3	0.00	14	.786	.	.	.	.	16.0	6.77
17	Teutopolis W (3–0 sets)	3	12	4.00	5	21	.333	5	1	3	0.33	11	.727	.	.	.	.	15.5	8.78
19	Burlington L (0–3 sets)	3	9	3.00	6	19	.158	1	0	1	0.00	7	.857	0	0.00	1	.000	9.0	5.27
29	Burlington L (1–3 sets)	4	14	3.50	5	25	.360	5	1	3	0.25	15	.800	.	.	.	.	16.0	6.66
34	Spokane W (3–2 sets)	5	20	4.00	9	34	.324	4	1	4	0.20	14	.714	1	0.20	1	1.000	21.5	7.53
39	Manitowoc W (3–2 sets)	5	14	2.80	9	33	.152	6	0	4	0.00	16	.750	1	0.20	1	1.000	16.5	6.60
44	Mendon W (3–2 sets)	5	17	3.40	5	27	.444	10	2	2	0.40	24	.917	2	0.40	3	.667	23.0	7.12
Total		61	201	3.30	82	389	.306	71	10	33	0.16	202	.837	7	0.11	12	.583	236.0	6.21

Match		Sets	Block					Dig		Receive
m	opponent/sets	sp	s	a	t	be	blk/s	d	d/s	3	rt	rcv	e	pct	pts	rating
1	Schenectady W (3–0 sets)	3	1	2	3	0	1.00	.	.	12	2.14	21	2	.905	12.0	6.27
2	Cincinnati L (0–3 sets)	3	0	2	2	1	0.67	4	1.33	11	1.83	24	5	.792	5.0	3.24
5	Manitowoc W (3–0 sets)	3	0	2	2	0	0.67	5	1.67	3	1.77	13	1	.923	9.0	5.05
6	Carlsbad W (3–1 sets)	4	0	2	2	0	0.50	5	1.25	9	2.04	23	2	.913	10.0	4.83
8	Spokane L (0–3 sets)	3	0	4	4	0	1.33	2	0.67	9	1.83	23	4	.826	19.0	7.47
9	Kentucky W (3–0 sets)	3	0	3	3	0	1.00	4	1.33	16	2.33	24	2	.917	3.5	5.27
10	Schenectady L (1–3 sets)	4	0	2	2	0	0.50	2	0.50	8	2.00	23	2	.913	7.0	2.70
11	Cincinnati L (2–3 sets)	5	0	3	3	1	0.60	2	0.40	17	2.21	34	1	.971	27.5	7.46
13	Sheboygan W (3–1 sets)	4	1	1	2	0	0.50	4	1.00	17	2.26	31	1	.968	25.5	8.35
14	Mendon L (1–3 sets)	4	0	4	4	0	1.00	3	0.75	14	2.06	34	3	.912	16.0	6.77
17	Teutopolis W (3–0 sets)	3	0	5	5	1	1.67	3	1.00	8	2.38	13	0	1.000	15.5	8.78
19	Burlington L (0–3 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	14	2.33	24	1	.958	9.0	5.27
29	Burlington L (1–3 sets)	4	0	2	2	0	0.50	3	0.75	17	2.14	35	3	.914	16.0	6.66
34	Spokane W (3–2 sets)	5	0	1	1	0	0.20	10	2.00	13	2.17	29	0	1.000	21.5	7.53
39	Manitowoc W (3–2 sets)	5	0	5	5	2	1.00	7	1.40	19	2.20	35	1	.971	16.5	6.60
44	Mendon W (3–2 sets)	5	2	4	6	0	1.20	4	0.80	12	2.12	25	3	.880	23.0	7.12
Total		61	4	42	46	5	0.75	58	0.95	199	2.12	411	31	.925	236.0	6.21