Players

Match		Sets	Attack					Serve						Set
m	opponent/sets	sp	k	k/s	e	ta	pct	pts	sa	se	sa/s	ta	pct	a	a/s	ta	pct	pts	rating
1	Nashville W (3–0 sets)	3	2	0.67	0	2	1.000	11	3	3	1.00	18	.833	36	12.00	65	.554	6.0	9.02
2	Starkville W (3–2 sets)	5	1	0.20	1	6	.000	5	0	4	0.00	19	.789	46	9.20	97	.474	2.5	4.58
3	Albuquerque L (0–3 sets)	3	1	0.33	2	4	-.250	3	0	4	0.00	11	.636	25	8.33	69	.362	2.0	4.41
6	Quincy L (0–3 sets)	3	0	0.00	0	3	.000	7	0	4	0.00	14	.714	29	9.67	62	.468	0.0	4.76
9	Spokane L (0–3 sets)	3	0	0.00	0	4	.000	6	1	2	0.33	14	.857	37	12.33	67	.552	1.5	7.98
11	Starkville W (3–1 sets)	4	3	0.75	0	8	.375	10	3	0	0.75	22	1.000	54	13.50	89	.607	6.0	9.25
15	Albuquerque L (0–3 sets)	3	1	0.33	0	3	.333	3	1	1	0.33	11	.909	40	13.33	78	.513	2.5	7.94
18	Tucson L (0–3 sets)	3	2	0.67	1	4	.250	3	1	1	0.33	9	.889	24	8.00	57	.421	3.5	4.32
21	Pekin L (1–3 sets)	4	2	0.50	2	10	.000	4	1	0	0.25	16	1.000	52	13.00	88	.591	6.0	8.99
33	Kentucky W (3–0 sets)	3	2	0.67	1	7	.143	9	0	2	0.00	17	.882	32	10.67	57	.561	3.5	7.89
35	Teutopolis L (0–3 sets)	3	2	0.67	0	2	1.000	1	0	2	0.00	10	.800	32	10.67	67	.478	3.0	5.95
39	Antioch W (3–0 sets)	3	1	0.33	2	6	-.167	13	0	0	0.00	24	1.000	46	15.33	65	.708	1.0	9.51
40	Albuquerque W (3–1 sets)	4	1	0.25	0	4	.250	7	1	4	0.25	19	.789	46	11.50	80	.575	4.0	7.53
44	Merritt Island W (3–0 sets)	3	2	0.67	1	4	.250	7	1	2	0.33	16	.875	44	14.67	62	.710	4.0	10.00
45	Tucson W (3–2 sets)	5	4	0.80	1	10	.300	11	3	3	0.60	22	.864	57	11.40	98	.582	8.0	7.33
Total		52	24	0.46	11	77	.169	100	15	32	0.29	242	.868	600	11.54	1101	.545	53.5	7.30

Match		Sets	Block					Dig		Receive
m	opponent/sets	sp	s	a	t	be	blk/s	d	d/s	3	rt	rcv	e	pct	pts	rating
1	Nashville W (3–0 sets)	3	0	2	2	0	0.67	6	2.00	.	.	.	.	.	6.0	9.02
2	Starkville W (3–2 sets)	5	0	3	3	1	0.60	5	1.00	.	.	.	.	.	2.5	4.58
3	Albuquerque L (0–3 sets)	3	0	2	2	1	0.67	4	1.33	.	.	.	.	.	2.0	4.41
6	Quincy L (0–3 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	3	1.00	.	.	.	.	.	0.0	4.76
9	Spokane L (0–3 sets)	3	0	1	1	0	0.33	7	2.33	.	.	.	.	.	1.5	7.98
11	Starkville W (3–1 sets)	4	.	.	.	.	.	7	1.75	.	.	.	.	.	6.0	9.25
15	Albuquerque L (0–3 sets)	3	0	1	1	1	0.33	2	0.67	.	.	.	.	.	2.5	7.94
18	Tucson L (0–3 sets)	3	0	1	1	0	0.33	5	1.67	.	.	.	.	.	3.5	4.32
21	Pekin L (1–3 sets)	4	1	4	5	0	1.25	3	0.75	.	.	.	.	.	6.0	8.99
33	Kentucky W (3–0 sets)	3	0	3	3	1	1.00	7	2.33	.	.	.	.	.	3.5	7.89
35	Teutopolis L (0–3 sets)	3	0	2	2	0	0.67	4	1.33	.	.	.	.	.	3.0	5.95
39	Antioch W (3–0 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	6	2.00	.	.	.	.	.	1.0	9.51
40	Albuquerque W (3–1 sets)	4	0	4	4	0	1.00	4	1.00	.	.	.	.	.	4.0	7.53
44	Merritt Island W (3–0 sets)	3	0	2	2	0	0.67	5	1.67	.	.	.	.	.	4.0	10.00
45	Tucson W (3–2 sets)	5	0	2	2	0	0.40	4	0.80	.	.	.	.	.	8.0	7.33
Total		52	1	27	28	6	0.54	72	1.38	.	.	.	.	.	53.5	7.30