Players

Session 13 Coaches Poll deadline in 10 hours and 32 minutes

MSWL UNITED MSWL U2 TMVL
Wednesday, April 29th, 2026 - 07:27:40 AM (gmt)

TMVL Season 17 // Landing

Logo

Donate ELO Ranking Honor Roll NET Ranking Stats Leaders Teams Of The Week Wall

If you'd like to join please click this link and add your name to the waitlist.

PAC 8 Conference

SEC Conference

BIG 8 Conference

Big East Conference

Austin Baumbach 5 Libero (L)
Player Skills
SERVING	RECEIVING	BLOCKING	ATTACKING	DEFENSE	SETTING
17	17	-	-	16	12

Season 11 Totals
DIGS	RCV RT	RCV PCT	ASSISTS	ACES
140 16th	2.31 33rd	.956 22nd	65 95th	20 105th

Career Honors

S122nd All-BIG-EAST

S132nd All-TMVL1st All-BIG-EAST

Match Statistics - OFFENSE (Season 11)

Match		Sets	Attack					Serve						Set
m	opponent/sets	sp	k	k/s	e	ta	pct	pts	sa	se	sa/s	ta	pct	a	a/s	ta	pct	pts	rating
3	Portland W (3–1 sets)	4	.	.	.	.	.	5	0	2	0.00	13	.846	7	1.75	9	.778	0.0	8.34
6	Denali L (0–3 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	6	1	0	0.33	11	1.000	2	0.67	6	.333	1.0	6.38
9	New Orleans L (2–3 sets)	5	.	.	.	.	.	5	0	3	0.00	14	.786	3	0.60	8	.375	0.0	8.14
12	Spokane L (1–3 sets)	4	.	.	.	.	.	4	4	1	1.00	11	.909	4	1.00	7	.571	4.0	4.75
13	Manitowoc W (3–0 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	2	1	2	0.33	7	.714	5	1.67	10	.500	1.0	7.81
15	Quincy W (3–2 sets)	5	.	.	.	.	.	2	0	1	0.00	10	.900	3	0.60	6	.500	0.0	6.80
18	Pekin W (3–0 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	3	2	1	0.67	9	.889	2	0.67	3	.667	2.0	6.68
19	Schenectady L (2–3 sets)	5	.	.	.	.	.	1	0	1	0.00	10	.900	3	0.60	5	.600	0.0	4.00
21	Tucson W (3–0 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	3	0	2	0.00	8	.750	2	0.67	3	.667	0.0	7.35
22	New Orleans W (3–0 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	5	2	0	0.67	11	1.000	6	2.00	8	.750	2.0	6.62
25	Baton Rouge W (3–1 sets)	4	.	.	.	.	.	5	1	2	0.25	13	.846	5	1.25	6	.833	1.0	9.27
30	Sheboygan L (2–3 sets)	5	.	.	.	.	.	1	1	2	0.20	10	.800	7	1.40	10	.700	1.0	5.55
32	San Jose W (3–2 sets)	5	.	.	.	.	.	8	3	1	0.60	19	.947	2	0.40	5	.400	3.0	5.10
34	Sheboygan W (3–0 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	4	2	2	0.67	9	.778	5	1.67	6	.833	2.0	4.51
37	Denali L (2–3 sets)	5	.	.	.	.	.	6	1	2	0.20	15	.867	4	0.80	7	.571	1.0	6.33
40	Ames W (3–1 sets)	4	.	.	.	.	.	2	1	2	0.25	10	.800	4	1.00	7	.571	1.0	8.59
45	Quincy L (1–3 sets)	4	.	.	.	.	.	6	1	1	0.25	14	.929	1	0.25	5	.200	1.0	6.18
Total		68	.	.	.	.	.	68	20	25	0.29	194	.871	65	0.96	111	.586	20.0	6.61

Match Statistics - DEFENSE (Season 11)

Match		Sets	Block					Dig		Receive
m	opponent/sets	sp	s	a	t	be	blk/s	d	d/s	3	rt	rcv	e	pct	pts	rating
3	Portland W (3–1 sets)	4	.	.	.	.	.	17	4.25	6	2.06	18	1	.944	0.0	8.34
6	Denali L (0–3 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	9	3.00	6	1.89	18	1	.944	1.0	6.38
9	New Orleans L (2–3 sets)	5	.	.	.	.	.	19	3.80	9	2.29	17	1	.941	0.0	8.14
12	Spokane L (1–3 sets)	4	.	.	.	.	.	5	1.25	8	2.21	14	1	.929	4.0	4.75
13	Manitowoc W (3–0 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	8	2.67	8	2.36	14	0	1.000	1.0	7.81
15	Quincy W (3–2 sets)	5	.	.	.	.	.	7	1.40	14	2.50	22	1	.955	0.0	6.80
18	Pekin W (3–0 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	3	1.00	7	2.75	8	0	1.000	2.0	6.68
19	Schenectady L (2–3 sets)	5	.	.	.	.	.	4	0.80	12	2.30	20	2	.900	0.0	4.00
21	Tucson W (3–0 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	5	1.67	7	2.50	10	0	1.000	0.0	7.35
22	New Orleans W (3–0 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	5	1.67	5	2.33	9	0	1.000	2.0	6.62
25	Baton Rouge W (3–1 sets)	4	.	.	.	.	.	12	3.00	9	2.53	15	0	1.000	1.0	9.27
30	Sheboygan L (2–3 sets)	5	.	.	.	.	.	12	2.40	11	2.05	22	2	.909	1.0	5.55
32	San Jose W (3–2 sets)	5	.	.	.	.	.	7	1.40	15	2.20	30	2	.933	3.0	5.10
34	Sheboygan W (3–0 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	3	1.00	7	2.29	14	0	1.000	2.0	4.51
37	Denali L (2–3 sets)	5	.	.	.	.	.	3	0.60	22	2.69	29	0	1.000	1.0	6.33
40	Ames W (3–1 sets)	4	.	.	.	.	.	10	2.50	9	2.57	14	0	1.000	1.0	8.59
45	Quincy L (1–3 sets)	4	.	.	.	.	.	11	2.75	8	2.00	19	2	.895	1.0	6.18
Total		68	.	.	.	.	.	140	2.06	163	2.31	293	13	.956	20.0	6.61