Players

Match		Sets	Attack					Serve						Set
m	opponent/sets	sp	k	k/s	e	ta	pct	pts	sa	se	sa/s	ta	pct	a	a/s	ta	pct	pts	rating
3	Burlington L (1–3 sets)	4	10	2.50	8	39	.051	1	0	1	0.00	9	.889	.	.	.	.	13.0	8.16
6	New Orleans W (3–2 sets)	5	13	2.60	10	44	.068	7	3	2	0.60	14	.857	.	.	.	.	17.0	6.60
9	Denali L (0–3 sets)	3	6	2.00	4	20	.100	4	2	2	0.67	10	.800	.	.	.	.	8.0	4.62
12	Cincinnati L (0–3 sets)	3	4	1.33	4	16	.000	0	0	0	0.00	6	1.000	.	.	.	.	4.0	2.78
15	Schenectady L (0–3 sets)	3	5	1.67	7	24	-.083	8	4	1	1.33	15	.933	.	.	.	.	9.5	6.46
17	Carlsbad W (3–0 sets)	3	8	2.67	1	14	.500	6	1	2	0.33	12	.833	.	.	.	.	12.0	9.50
21	Teutopolis L (0–3 sets)	3	11	3.67	5	26	.231	4	0	1	0.00	10	.900	.	.	.	.	11.0	5.64
26	Starkville L (1–3 sets)	4	10	2.50	4	23	.261	3	0	2	0.00	12	.833	.	.	.	.	10.5	4.72
29	Arlington W (3–0 sets)	3	5	1.67	2	14	.214	3	1	1	0.33	10	.900	.	.	.	.	8.0	6.93
35	Mat-Su W (3–1 sets)	4	6	1.50	1	16	.313	9	2	2	0.50	17	.882	.	.	.	.	10.0	7.35
39	Columbia L (0–3 sets)	3	4	1.33	1	6	.500	4	0	1	0.00	12	.917	.	.	.	.	5.0	5.22
Total		38	82	2.16	47	242	.145	49	13	15	0.34	127	.882	.	.	.	.	108.0	6.18

Match		Sets	Block					Dig		Receive
m	opponent/sets	sp	s	a	t	be	blk/s	d	d/s	3	rt	rcv	e	pct	pts	rating
3	Burlington L (1–3 sets)	4	1	4	5	0	1.25	7	1.75	.	.	.	.	.	13.0	8.16
6	New Orleans W (3–2 sets)	5	0	2	2	1	0.40	6	1.20	.	.	.	.	.	17.0	6.60
9	Denali L (0–3 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	4	1.33	.	.	.	.	.	8.0	4.62
12	Cincinnati L (0–3 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	3	1.00	.	.	.	.	.	4.0	2.78
15	Schenectady L (0–3 sets)	3	0	1	1	0	0.33	7	2.33	.	.	.	.	.	9.5	6.46
17	Carlsbad W (3–0 sets)	3	0	6	6	2	2.00	4	1.33	.	.	.	.	.	12.0	9.50
21	Teutopolis L (0–3 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	3	1.00	.	.	.	.	.	11.0	5.64
26	Starkville L (1–3 sets)	4	0	1	1	0	0.25	2	0.50	.	.	.	.	.	10.5	4.72
29	Arlington W (3–0 sets)	3	0	4	4	1	1.33	2	0.67	.	.	.	.	.	8.0	6.93
35	Mat-Su W (3–1 sets)	4	0	4	4	0	1.00	4	1.00	.	.	.	.	.	10.0	7.35
39	Columbia L (0–3 sets)	3	0	2	2	0	0.67	1	0.33	.	.	.	.	.	5.0	5.22
Total		38	1	24	25	4	0.66	43	1.13	.	.	.	.	.	108.0	6.18