Players

Match		Sets	Attack					Serve						Set
m	opponent/sets	sp	k	k/s	e	ta	pct	pts	sa	se	sa/s	ta	pct	a	a/s	ta	pct	pts	rating
4	Mat-Su L (0–3 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	2	1	0	0.33	7	1.000	2	0.67	6	.333	1.0	1.50
8	San Jose L (0–3 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	2	0.67	8	.250	0.0	5.08
15	Kentucky W (3–2 sets)	5	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	6	1.20	17	.353	0.0	6.58
17	Arlington W (3–2 sets)	5	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	6	1.20	8	.750	0.0	3.20
18	Starkville L (0–3 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	3	1.00	8	.375	0.0	6.30
31	Cincinnati L (0–3 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	4	3	0	1.00	8	1.000	3	1.00	3	1.000	3.0	3.03
36	Mendon L (2–3 sets)	5	.	.	.	.	.	8	2	3	0.40	16	.813	5	1.00	18	.278	2.0	6.20
39	Albuquerque L (0–3 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	5	1.67	6	.833	0.0	3.73
41	Manitowoc W (3–1 sets)	4	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	4	1.00	6	.667	0.0	6.53
44	Tucson W (3–0 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	3	1.00	4	.750	0.0	4.50
46	Mat-Su W (3–1 sets)	4	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	5	1.25	6	.833	0.0	5.23
Total		41	.	.	.	.	.	14	6	3	0.15	31	.903	44	1.07	90	.489	6.0	4.72

Match		Sets	Block					Dig		Receive
m	opponent/sets	sp	s	a	t	be	blk/s	d	d/s	3	rt	rcv	e	pct	pts	rating
4	Mat-Su L (0–3 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	1	0.33	3	1.33	12	3	.750	1.0	1.50
8	San Jose L (0–3 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	14	2.45	20	1	.950	0.0	5.08
15	Kentucky W (3–2 sets)	5	.	.	.	.	.	15	3.00	8	1.95	20	1	.950	0.0	6.58
17	Arlington W (3–2 sets)	5	.	.	.	.	.	3	0.60	8	1.95	21	1	.952	0.0	3.20
18	Starkville L (0–3 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	5	1.67	12	2.38	21	1	.952	0.0	6.30
31	Cincinnati L (0–3 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	1	0.33	10	1.89	28	2	.929	3.0	3.03
36	Mendon L (2–3 sets)	5	.	.	.	.	.	11	2.20	15	2.11	28	4	.857	2.0	6.20
39	Albuquerque L (0–3 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	14	2.19	26	1	.962	0.0	3.73
41	Manitowoc W (3–1 sets)	4	.	.	.	.	.	8	2.00	13	2.35	23	0	1.000	0.0	6.53
44	Tucson W (3–0 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	4	1.33	13	2.04	26	4	.846	0.0	4.50
46	Mat-Su W (3–1 sets)	4	.	.	.	.	.	11	2.75	10	1.80	25	5	.800	0.0	5.23
Total		41	.	.	.	.	.	59	1.44	120	2.06	250	23	.908	6.0	4.72