Players

Frosty Tickletackle 5 Libero (L)
Player Skills
SERVING	RECEIVING	BLOCKING	ATTACKING	DEFENSE	SETTING
15	15	-	-	14	13

Match		Sets	Attack					Serve						Set
m	opponent/sets	sp	k	k/s	e	ta	pct	pts	sa	se	sa/s	ta	pct	a	a/s	ta	pct	pts	rating
1	Schenectady W (3–2 sets)	5	.	.	.	.	.	7	3	2	0.60	17	.882	4	0.80	10	.400	3.0	8.38
2	Cincinnati L (0–3 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	1	0	4	0.00	7	.429	0	0.00	9	.000	0.0	5.60
5	Manitowoc W (3–2 sets)	5	.	.	.	.	.	3	0	5	0.00	13	.615	5	1.00	9	.556	0.0	7.18
7	Spokane W (3–0 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	9	3.00	12	.750	0.0	7.83
8	Burlington W (3–1 sets)	4	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	3	0.75	5	.600	0.0	5.35
9	Antioch L (0–3 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	1	1	1	0.33	6	.833	3	1.00	6	.500	1.0	5.05
15	Columbia W (3–2 sets)	5	.	.	.	.	.	7	1	3	0.20	16	.813	4	0.80	11	.364	1.0	8.61
17	Nashville W (3–0 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	2	0	0	0.00	8	1.000	1	0.33	4	.250	0.0	8.38
18	Dallas L (0–3 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	3	0	0	0.00	8	1.000	2	0.67	7	.286	0.0	5.10
21	Mat-Su W (3–1 sets)	4	.	.	.	.	.	5	0	3	0.00	15	.800	5	1.25	8	.625	0.0	5.78
25	Antioch W (3–2 sets)	5	.	.	.	.	.	4	1	0	0.20	13	1.000	1	0.20	5	.200	1.0	4.50
26	Denali L (1–3 sets)	4	.	.	.	.	.	6	0	2	0.00	17	.882	6	1.50	8	.750	0.0	7.21
29	Spokane W (3–2 sets)	5	.	.	.	.	.	6	1	2	0.20	15	.867	7	1.40	14	.500	1.0	5.80
34	Burlington L (0–3 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	3	1	3	0.33	9	.667	1	0.33	1	1.000	1.0	6.13
39	Manitowoc L (2–3 sets)	5	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	2	0.40	10	.200	0.0	6.55
40	Tucson W (3–0 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	5	1.67	9	.556	0.0	8.45
44	Mendon W (3–0 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	6	2.00	9	.667	0.0	8.04
45	Nashville W (3–1 sets)	4	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	5	1.25	6	.833	0.0	5.00
Total		70	.	.	.	.	.	48	8	25	0.11	144	.826	69	0.99	143	.483	8.0	6.61

Match		Sets	Block					Dig		Receive
m	opponent/sets	sp	s	a	t	be	blk/s	d	d/s	3	rt	rcv	e	pct	pts	rating
1	Schenectady W (3–2 sets)	5	.	.	.	.	.	20	4.00	4	2.22	9	0	1.000	3.0	8.38
2	Cincinnati L (0–3 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	6	2.00	11	2.24	21	0	1.000	0.0	5.60
5	Manitowoc W (3–2 sets)	5	.	.	.	.	.	10	2.00	14	2.41	27	0	1.000	0.0	7.18
7	Spokane W (3–0 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	6	2.00	16	2.48	23	1	.957	0.0	7.83
8	Burlington W (3–1 sets)	4	.	.	.	.	.	5	1.25	22	2.38	34	1	.971	0.0	5.35
9	Antioch L (0–3 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	4	1.33	8	2.21	14	2	.857	1.0	5.05
15	Columbia W (3–2 sets)	5	.	.	.	.	.	22	4.40	9	2.22	18	0	1.000	1.0	8.61
17	Nashville W (3–0 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	14	4.67	7	2.09	23	2	.913	0.0	8.38
18	Dallas L (0–3 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	4	1.33	7	2.17	12	0	1.000	0.0	5.10
21	Mat-Su W (3–1 sets)	4	.	.	.	.	.	7	1.75	11	2.09	22	1	.955	0.0	5.78
25	Antioch W (3–2 sets)	5	.	.	.	.	.	6	1.20	15	2.19	26	1	.962	1.0	4.50
26	Denali L (1–3 sets)	4	.	.	.	.	.	10	2.50	16	2.32	31	1	.968	0.0	7.21
29	Spokane W (3–2 sets)	5	.	.	.	.	.	9	1.80	10	2.05	20	1	.950	1.0	5.80
34	Burlington L (0–3 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	1	0.33	10	2.71	14	0	1.000	1.0	6.13
39	Manitowoc L (2–3 sets)	5	.	.	.	.	.	6	1.20	16	2.60	25	0	1.000	0.0	6.55
40	Tucson W (3–0 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	7	2.33	18	2.71	21	1	.952	0.0	8.45
44	Mendon W (3–0 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	6	2.00	8	2.55	11	1	.909	0.0	8.04
45	Nashville W (3–1 sets)	4	.	.	.	.	.	6	1.50	16	2.15	33	5	.848	0.0	5.00
Total		70	.	.	.	.	.	149	2.13	218	2.32	384	17	.956	8.0	6.61