Players

Match		Sets	Attack					Serve						Set
m	opponent/sets	sp	k	k/s	e	ta	pct	pts	sa	se	sa/s	ta	pct	a	a/s	ta	pct	pts	rating
6	Starkville L (2–3 sets)	5	0	0.00	0	3	.000	6	1	3	0.20	16	.813	35	7.00	91	.385	2.0	3.28
18	Cincinnati L (0–3 sets)	3	1	0.33	1	2	.000	1	0	3	0.00	8	.625	23	7.67	52	.442	1.5	3.02
22	Arlington L (2–3 sets)	5	0	0.00	0	6	.000	6	1	3	0.20	18	.833	52	10.40	114	.456	4.0	6.49
26	New Orleans L (0–3 sets)	3	1	0.33	0	2	.500	2	0	3	0.00	12	.750	35	11.67	62	.565	1.0	6.36
31	Spokane L (0–3 sets)	3	0	0.00	1	2	-.500	4	0	6	0.00	12	.500	31	10.33	64	.484	2.0	6.00
36	Mat-Su W (3–0 sets)	3	0	0.00	1	4	-.250	7	3	2	1.00	13	.846	32	10.67	56	.571	3.0	5.32
Total		22	2	0.09	3	19	-.053	26	5	20	0.23	79	.747	208	9.45	439	.474	13.5	5.08

Match		Sets	Block					Dig		Receive
m	opponent/sets	sp	s	a	t	be	blk/s	d	d/s	3	rt	rcv	e	pct	pts	rating
6	Starkville L (2–3 sets)	5	0	2	2	0	0.40	7	1.40	.	.	.	.	.	2.0	3.28
18	Cincinnati L (0–3 sets)	3	0	1	1	0	0.33	1	0.33	.	.	.	.	.	1.5	3.02
22	Arlington L (2–3 sets)	5	0	6	6	0	1.20	10	2.00	.	.	.	.	.	4.0	6.49
26	New Orleans L (0–3 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	6	2.00	.	.	.	.	.	1.0	6.36
31	Spokane L (0–3 sets)	3	0	4	4	0	1.33	2	0.67	.	.	.	.	.	2.0	6.00
36	Mat-Su W (3–0 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	3	1.00	.	.	.	.	.	3.0	5.32
Total		22	0	13	13	1	0.59	29	1.32	.	.	.	.	.	13.5	5.08