Players

Match		Sets	Attack					Serve						Set
m	opponent/sets	sp	k	k/s	e	ta	pct	pts	sa	se	sa/s	ta	pct	a	a/s	ta	pct	pts	rating
3	Manitowoc L (2–3 sets)	5	0	0.00	2	5	-.400	4	0	1	0.00	15	.933	48	9.60	112	.429	1.0	4.40
9	Carlsbad L (1–3 sets)	4	1	0.25	1	6	.000	8	1	0	0.25	18	1.000	47	11.75	100	.470	3.0	7.68
12	Cincinnati L (0–3 sets)	3	0	0.00	1	2	-.500	0	0	3	0.00	7	.571	26	8.67	60	.433	0.0	2.68
15	Mendon W (3–0 sets)	3	1	0.33	0	3	.333	11	2	4	0.67	19	.789	45	15.00	68	.662	4.0	9.41
18	Burlington W (3–0 sets)	3	3	1.00	0	5	.600	5	1	3	0.33	12	.750	39	13.00	54	.722	4.5	8.64
21	Baton Rouge W (3–1 sets)	4	2	0.50	1	6	.167	4	1	1	0.25	15	.933	49	12.25	90	.544	4.0	7.92
26	Starkville W (3–0 sets)	3	2	0.67	2	6	.000	5	0	2	0.00	12	.833	42	14.00	61	.689	4.5	9.95
30	St. Charles W (3–1 sets)	4	2	0.50	0	5	.400	8	2	1	0.50	16	.938	57	14.25	82	.695	4.0	8.74
34	Dallas W (3–1 sets)	4	0	0.00	1	4	-.250	4	0	1	0.00	12	.917	44	11.00	73	.603	1.0	5.74
39	Arlington W (3–1 sets)	4	3	0.75	0	6	.500	4	0	2	0.00	15	.867	54	13.50	87	.621	4.0	9.18
Total		37	14	0.38	8	48	.125	53	7	18	0.19	141	.872	451	12.19	787	.573	30.0	7.43

Match		Sets	Block					Dig		Receive
m	opponent/sets	sp	s	a	t	be	blk/s	d	d/s	3	rt	rcv	e	pct	pts	rating
3	Manitowoc L (2–3 sets)	5	0	2	2	0	0.40	4	0.80	.	.	.	.	.	1.0	4.40
9	Carlsbad L (1–3 sets)	4	0	2	2	0	0.50	8	2.00	.	.	.	.	.	3.0	7.68
12	Cincinnati L (0–3 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	0.0	2.68
15	Mendon W (3–0 sets)	3	1	0	1	0	0.33	2	0.67	.	.	.	.	.	4.0	9.41
18	Burlington W (3–0 sets)	3	0	1	1	0	0.33	2	0.67	.	.	.	.	.	4.5	8.64
21	Baton Rouge W (3–1 sets)	4	0	2	2	1	0.50	8	2.00	.	.	.	.	.	4.0	7.92
26	Starkville W (3–0 sets)	3	0	5	5	0	1.67	1	0.33	.	.	.	.	.	4.5	9.95
30	St. Charles W (3–1 sets)	4	.	.	.	.	.	3	0.75	.	.	.	.	.	4.0	8.74
34	Dallas W (3–1 sets)	4	0	2	2	0	0.50	9	2.25	.	.	.	.	.	1.0	5.74
39	Arlington W (3–1 sets)	4	0	2	2	0	0.50	7	1.75	.	.	.	.	.	4.0	9.18
Total		37	1	16	17	3	0.46	44	1.19	.	.	.	.	.	30.0	7.43