Players

Francesco Delucchi 5 Middle Blocker (MB)
Player Skills
SERVING	RECEIVING	BLOCKING	ATTACKING	DEFENSE	SETTING
13	-	15	13	5	-

Match		Sets	Attack					Serve						Set
m	opponent/sets	sp	k	k/s	e	ta	pct	pts	sa	se	sa/s	ta	pct	a	a/s	ta	pct	pts	rating
2	Mendon L (1–3 sets)	4	2	0.50	0	7	.286	3	1	1	0.25	12	.917	.	.	.	.	6.0	5.99
3	Pekin L (1–3 sets)	4	5	1.25	4	13	.077	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	5.5	2.18
4	Cincinnati L (0–3 sets)	3	2	0.67	3	11	-.091	1	1	1	0.33	8	.875	.	.	.	.	4.5	3.22
6	San Diego W (3–0 sets)	3	2	0.67	2	10	.000	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	4.0	4.60
10	Burlington L (2–3 sets)	5	10	2.00	5	16	.313	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	11.0	4.06
11	Mendon L (0–3 sets)	3	1	0.33	1	5	.000	7	0	1	0.00	14	.929	.	.	.	.	1.5	3.60
13	Cincinnati L (0–3 sets)	3	4	1.33	2	15	.133	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	6.0	4.93
15	St. Charles W (3–0 sets)	3	1	0.33	0	1	1.000	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	2.0	2.92
17	Starkville L (0–3 sets)	3	3	1.00	1	5	.400	1	0	1	0.00	7	.857	.	.	.	.	4.0	3.57
18	Portland L (2–3 sets)	5	4	0.80	5	16	-.063	2	0	0	0.00	10	1.000	.	.	.	.	5.5	2.26
21	Albuquerque L (0–3 sets)	3	3	1.00	1	5	.400	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	3.0	1.35
22	Cincinnati L (1–3 sets)	4	4	1.00	2	11	.182	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	5.0	2.79
25	Teutopolis L (1–3 sets)	4	5	1.25	6	15	-.067	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	7.0	3.62
26	Carlsbad W (3–2 sets)	5	4	0.80	4	13	.000	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	5.0	1.96
29	Sheboygan L (2–3 sets)	5	5	1.00	3	13	.154	7	2	1	0.40	16	.938	.	.	.	.	10.5	6.40
31	Antioch W (3–2 sets)	5	4	0.80	3	14	.071	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	6.5	3.88
34	Schenectady L (0–3 sets)	3	3	1.00	3	8	.000	1	0	1	0.00	6	.833	.	.	.	.	4.0	2.61
39	Alton L (0–3 sets)	3	4	1.33	4	12	.000	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	4.0	2.05
41	Albuquerque L (0–3 sets)	3	5	1.67	1	8	.500	0	0	0	0.00	5	1.000	.	.	.	.	6.0	4.32
Total		71	71	1.00	50	198	.106	22	4	6	0.06	78	.923	.	.	.	.	101.0	3.49

Match		Sets	Block					Dig		Receive
m	opponent/sets	sp	s	a	t	be	blk/s	d	d/s	3	rt	rcv	e	pct	pts	rating
2	Mendon L (1–3 sets)	4	0	6	6	0	1.50	2	0.50	.	.	.	.	.	6.0	5.99
3	Pekin L (1–3 sets)	4	0	1	1	0	0.25	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	5.5	2.18
4	Cincinnati L (0–3 sets)	3	1	1	2	2	0.67	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	4.5	3.22
6	San Diego W (3–0 sets)	3	0	4	4	0	1.33	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	4.0	4.60
10	Burlington L (2–3 sets)	5	0	2	2	0	0.40	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	11.0	4.06
11	Mendon L (0–3 sets)	3	0	1	1	0	0.33	3	1.00	.	.	.	.	.	1.5	3.60
13	Cincinnati L (0–3 sets)	3	1	2	3	0	1.00	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	6.0	4.93
15	St. Charles W (3–0 sets)	3	0	2	2	0	0.67	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	2.0	2.92
17	Starkville L (0–3 sets)	3	0	2	2	1	0.67	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	4.0	3.57
18	Portland L (2–3 sets)	5	1	1	2	1	0.40	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	5.5	2.26
21	Albuquerque L (0–3 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	3.0	1.35
22	Cincinnati L (1–3 sets)	4	0	2	2	1	0.50	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	5.0	2.79
25	Teutopolis L (1–3 sets)	4	1	2	3	0	0.75	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	7.0	3.62
26	Carlsbad W (3–2 sets)	5	0	2	2	2	0.40	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	5.0	1.96
29	Sheboygan L (2–3 sets)	5	0	7	7	1	1.40	1	0.20	.	.	.	.	.	10.5	6.40
31	Antioch W (3–2 sets)	5	0	5	5	0	1.00	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	6.5	3.88
34	Schenectady L (0–3 sets)	3	1	0	1	0	0.33	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	4.0	2.61
39	Alton L (0–3 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	4.0	2.05
41	Albuquerque L (0–3 sets)	3	0	2	2	0	0.67	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	6.0	4.32
Total		71	5	42	47	9	0.66	6	0.08	.	.	.	.	.	101.0	3.49