Players

Duncan Idaho 5 Middle Blocker (MB)
Player Skills
SERVING	RECEIVING	BLOCKING	ATTACKING	DEFENSE	SETTING
15	-	16	16	7	-

Match		Sets	Attack					Serve						Set
m	opponent/sets	sp	k	k/s	e	ta	pct	pts	sa	se	sa/s	ta	pct	a	a/s	ta	pct	pts	rating
1	St. Charles W (3–1 sets)	4	7	1.75	8	15	-.067	5	0	2	0.00	13	.846	.	.	.	.	8.5	5.88
2	Ames L (0–3 sets)	3	4	1.33	0	4	1.000	1	0	1	0.00	6	.833	.	.	.	.	5.0	4.46
4	Columbia L (0–3 sets)	3	12	4.00	0	14	.857	3	1	1	0.33	12	.917	.	.	.	.	14.5	7.62
6	Starkville W (3–0 sets)	3	11	3.67	2	14	.643	8	3	2	1.00	14	.857	.	.	.	.	17.0	10.00
7	Quincy L (0–3 sets)	3	5	1.67	3	13	.154	1	0	3	0.00	6	.500	.	.	.	.	6.0	3.66
10	St. Charles L (1–3 sets)	4	9	2.25	2	14	.500	5	0	2	0.00	14	.857	.	.	.	.	11.5	7.57
11	Ames W (3–2 sets)	5	10	2.00	2	12	.667	2	0	4	0.00	12	.667	.	.	.	.	13.0	6.76
17	San Diego L (2–3 sets)	5	13	2.60	2	17	.647	11	2	3	0.40	25	.880	.	.	.	.	18.5	8.58
18	Mendon W (3–1 sets)	4	12	3.00	7	27	.185	4	1	4	0.25	12	.667	.	.	.	.	14.5	7.06
21	New Orleans L (2–3 sets)	5	13	2.60	4	20	.450	4	0	2	0.00	14	.857	.	.	.	.	13.0	4.69
22	Manitowoc W (3–1 sets)	4	8	2.00	4	15	.267	8	1	4	0.25	18	.778	.	.	.	.	12.0	8.69
25	Tucson L (0–3 sets)	3	8	2.67	2	11	.545	0	0	1	0.00	6	.833	.	.	.	.	9.5	6.68
26	Teutopolis L (0–3 sets)	3	8	2.67	1	11	.636	2	2	1	0.67	8	.875	.	.	.	.	10.0	4.40
29	Quincy W (3–1 sets)	4	12	3.00	7	24	.208	2	1	2	0.25	10	.800	.	.	.	.	15.5	8.05
33	Antioch L (2–3 sets)	5	12	2.40	3	16	.563	7	2	2	0.40	16	.875	.	.	.	.	21.0	9.76
34	Arlington W (3–2 sets)	5	11	2.20	3	14	.571	5	1	0	0.20	14	1.000	.	.	.	.	14.0	5.69
35	Sheboygan L (0–3 sets)	3	4	1.33	5	11	-.091	4	1	3	0.33	10	.700	.	.	.	.	5.0	3.29
39	Pekin L (0–3 sets)	3	7	2.33	4	12	.250	4	1	1	0.33	11	.909	.	.	.	.	9.0	6.42
40	Baton Rouge W (3–2 sets)	5	15	3.00	5	24	.417	7	1	0	0.20	16	1.000	.	.	.	.	18.5	7.77
44	Dallas L (0–3 sets)	3	9	3.00	2	14	.500	0	0	1	0.00	6	.833	.	.	.	.	9.5	5.20
45	Nashville L (0–3 sets)	3	7	2.33	0	8	.875	0	0	3	0.00	6	.500	.	.	.	.	8.0	5.37
Total		80	197	2.46	66	310	.423	83	17	42	0.21	249	.831	.	.	.	.	253.5	6.55

Match		Sets	Block					Dig		Receive
m	opponent/sets	sp	s	a	t	be	blk/s	d	d/s	3	rt	rcv	e	pct	pts	rating
1	St. Charles W (3–1 sets)	4	0	3	3	0	0.75	2	0.50	.	.	.	.	.	8.5	5.88
2	Ames L (0–3 sets)	3	0	2	2	1	0.67	2	0.67	.	.	.	.	.	5.0	4.46
4	Columbia L (0–3 sets)	3	1	1	2	0	0.67	1	0.33	.	.	.	.	.	14.5	7.62
6	Starkville W (3–0 sets)	3	0	6	6	0	2.00	4	1.33	.	.	.	.	.	17.0	10.00
7	Quincy L (0–3 sets)	3	1	0	1	1	0.33	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	6.0	3.66
10	St. Charles L (1–3 sets)	4	1	3	4	0	1.00	3	0.75	.	.	.	.	.	11.5	7.57
11	Ames W (3–2 sets)	5	0	6	6	0	1.20	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	13.0	6.76
17	San Diego L (2–3 sets)	5	1	5	6	1	1.20	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	18.5	8.58
18	Mendon W (3–1 sets)	4	0	3	3	1	0.75	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	14.5	7.06
21	New Orleans L (2–3 sets)	5	.	.	.	.	.	2	0.40	.	.	.	.	.	13.0	4.69
22	Manitowoc W (3–1 sets)	4	0	6	6	1	1.50	2	0.50	.	.	.	.	.	12.0	8.69
25	Tucson L (0–3 sets)	3	0	3	3	0	1.00	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	9.5	6.68
26	Teutopolis L (0–3 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	10.0	4.40
29	Quincy W (3–1 sets)	4	0	5	5	1	1.25	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	15.5	8.05
33	Antioch L (2–3 sets)	5	3	8	11	0	2.20	1	0.20	.	.	.	.	.	21.0	9.76
34	Arlington W (3–2 sets)	5	1	2	3	1	0.60	1	0.20	.	.	.	.	.	14.0	5.69
35	Sheboygan L (0–3 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	2	0.67	.	.	.	.	.	5.0	3.29
39	Pekin L (0–3 sets)	3	0	2	2	0	0.67	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	9.0	6.42
40	Baton Rouge W (3–2 sets)	5	1	3	4	0	0.80	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	18.5	7.77
44	Dallas L (0–3 sets)	3	0	1	1	0	0.33	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	9.5	5.20
45	Nashville L (0–3 sets)	3	0	2	2	0	0.67	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	8.0	5.37
Total		80	9	61	70	9	0.88	20	0.25	.	.	.	.	.	253.5	6.55