Players

Mikah Dominguez 5 Outside Hitter (OH)
Player Skills
SERVING	RECEIVING	BLOCKING	ATTACKING	DEFENSE	SETTING
11	14	13	13	10	3

Match		Sets	Attack					Serve						Set
m	opponent/sets	sp	k	k/s	e	ta	pct	pts	sa	se	sa/s	ta	pct	a	a/s	ta	pct	pts	rating
3	Antioch W (3–2 sets)	5	10	2.00	5	24	.208	7	0	1	0.00	16	.938	.	.	.	.	11.5	4.69
4	Burlington W (3–0 sets)	3	4	1.33	2	6	.333	10	2	0	0.67	15	1.000	.	.	.	.	7.0	5.09
5	Teutopolis W (3–0 sets)	3	5	1.67	5	14	.000	6	1	1	0.33	10	.900	.	.	.	.	8.0	6.00
6	Schenectady L (0–3 sets)	3	6	2.00	4	13	.154	7	0	2	0.00	13	.846	1	0.33	1	1.000	7.0	4.43
8	Pekin W (3–0 sets)	3	3	1.00	2	10	.100	4	0	3	0.00	9	.667	.	.	.	.	6.0	4.57
9	Baton Rouge L (1–3 sets)	4	6	1.50	4	12	.167	3	1	2	0.25	11	.818	0	0.00	1	.000	7.0	3.05
12	Burlington W (3–0 sets)	3	8	2.67	1	18	.389	4	0	1	0.00	7	.857	.	.	.	.	15.5	7.30
13	Columbia W (3–1 sets)	4	7	1.75	1	15	.400	5	2	4	0.50	15	.733	.	.	.	.	12.5	5.28
17	Teutopolis L (0–3 sets)	3	6	2.00	6	15	.000	1	0	2	0.00	7	.714	0	0.00	1	.000	6.0	2.51
18	St. Charles L (1–3 sets)	4	12	3.00	7	25	.200	5	3	1	0.75	17	.941	.	.	.	.	15.5	6.56
20	Schenectady L (1–3 sets)	4	10	2.50	5	25	.200	7	0	3	0.00	18	.833	0	0.00	1	.000	10.0	5.17
21	Pekin L (0–3 sets)	3	4	1.33	5	16	-.063	1	0	3	0.00	9	.667	1	0.33	2	.500	4.0	2.94
24	Baton Rouge L (2–3 sets)	5	12	2.40	3	19	.474	10	2	4	0.40	22	.818	0	0.00	2	.000	14.0	5.51
25	Antioch W (3–0 sets)	3	4	1.33	3	14	.071	5	0	3	0.00	13	.769	.	.	.	.	7.0	5.24
28	Santa Clara L (0–3 sets)	3	3	1.00	1	16	.125	2	0	2	0.00	7	.714	1	0.33	1	1.000	3.5	4.11
29	Mendon L (1–3 sets)	4	4	1.00	6	16	-.125	7	0	1	0.00	13	.923	0	0.00	1	.000	7.0	4.75
33	Carlsbad L (0–3 sets)	3	6	2.00	2	13	.308	1	0	4	0.00	7	.429	.	.	.	.	6.5	4.04
36	San Diego W (3–0 sets)	3	5	1.67	0	6	.833	6	1	1	0.33	12	.917	.	.	.	.	7.0	4.41
37	New Orleans L (2–3 sets)	5	6	1.20	3	15	.200	6	1	2	0.20	15	.867	.	.	.	.	9.5	4.32
Total		68	121	1.78	65	292	.192	97	13	40	0.19	236	.831	4	0.06	10	.400	164.5	4.74

Match		Sets	Block					Dig		Receive
m	opponent/sets	sp	s	a	t	be	blk/s	d	d/s	3	rt	rcv	e	pct	pts	rating
3	Antioch W (3–2 sets)	5	0	3	3	0	0.60	8	1.60	14	2.13	31	1	.968	11.5	4.69
4	Burlington W (3–0 sets)	3	0	2	2	0	0.67	5	1.67	13	2.24	21	3	.857	7.0	5.09
5	Teutopolis W (3–0 sets)	3	0	4	4	0	1.33	10	3.33	11	2.47	15	1	.933	8.0	6.00
6	Schenectady L (0–3 sets)	3	0	2	2	1	0.67	1	0.33	6	2.14	14	0	1.000	7.0	4.43
8	Pekin W (3–0 sets)	3	0	6	6	1	2.00	6	2.00	6	2.00	15	0	1.000	6.0	4.57
9	Baton Rouge L (1–3 sets)	4	.	.	.	.	.	4	1.00	16	2.15	27	2	.926	7.0	3.05
12	Burlington W (3–0 sets)	3	0	15	15	0	5.00	3	1.00	7	2.46	13	0	1.000	15.5	7.30
13	Columbia W (3–1 sets)	4	0	7	7	0	1.75	10	2.50	8	2.27	15	0	1.000	12.5	5.28
17	Teutopolis L (0–3 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	8	2.67	12	1.70	27	8	.704	6.0	2.51
18	St. Charles L (1–3 sets)	4	0	1	1	0	0.25	4	1.00	14	2.38	24	0	1.000	15.5	6.56
20	Schenectady L (1–3 sets)	4	.	.	.	.	.	12	3.00	8	1.95	21	2	.905	10.0	5.17
21	Pekin L (0–3 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	10	3.33	9	1.95	21	2	.905	4.0	2.94
24	Baton Rouge L (2–3 sets)	5	.	.	.	.	.	8	1.60	15	2.28	29	0	1.000	14.0	5.51
25	Antioch W (3–0 sets)	3	1	4	5	0	1.67	7	2.33	9	2.19	16	0	1.000	7.0	5.24
28	Santa Clara L (0–3 sets)	3	0	1	1	1	0.33	7	2.33	12	2.25	20	2	.900	3.5	4.11
29	Mendon L (1–3 sets)	4	2	2	4	0	1.00	9	2.25	11	2.15	20	3	.850	7.0	4.75
33	Carlsbad L (0–3 sets)	3	0	1	1	0	0.33	4	1.33	14	2.20	25	2	.920	6.5	4.04
36	San Diego W (3–0 sets)	3	0	2	2	1	0.67	5	1.67	7	2.15	13	1	.923	7.0	4.41
37	New Orleans L (2–3 sets)	5	0	5	5	1	1.00	.	.	22	2.37	38	2	.947	9.5	4.32
Total		68	3	55	58	5	0.85	121	1.78	214	2.18	405	29	.928	164.5	4.74