Players

MSWL UNITED MSWL U2 TMVL
Friday, May 1st, 2026 - 11:15:52 AM (gmt)

TMVL Season 17 // Landing

Logo

Donate ELO Ranking Honor Roll NET Ranking Stats Leaders Teams Of The Week Wall

If you'd like to join please click this link and add your name to the waitlist.

PAC 8 Conference

SEC Conference

BIG 8 Conference

Big East Conference

Moose Baranowski 5 Middle Blocker (MB)
Player Skills
SERVING	RECEIVING	BLOCKING	ATTACKING	DEFENSE	SETTING
15	-	16	16	9	-

Season 11 Totals
KILLS	ATK PCT	ACES	DIGS	BLOCKS
86 224th	.217 275th	12 202nd	12 393rd	44 166th

Career Honors

S132nd All-SEC

S141st All-SEC

Match Statistics - OFFENSE (Season 11)

Match		Sets	Attack					Serve						Set
m	opponent/sets	sp	k	k/s	e	ta	pct	pts	sa	se	sa/s	ta	pct	a	a/s	ta	pct	pts	rating
1	Teutopolis W (3–2 sets)	5	10	2.00	5	22	.227	9	3	3	0.60	18	.833	.	.	.	.	14.0	5.48
2	Kentucky L (0–3 sets)	3	1	0.33	3	7	-.286	0	0	1	0.00	5	.800	.	.	.	.	3.0	4.01
5	Starkville W (3–1 sets)	4	7	1.75	7	20	.000	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	9.0	4.67
6	Portland L (2–3 sets)	5	8	1.60	9	19	-.053	5	1	3	0.20	12	.750	.	.	.	.	12.0	6.74
7	Nashville L (0–3 sets)	3	4	1.33	1	10	.300	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	4.5	3.01
9	Burlington W (3–2 sets)	5	5	1.00	2	12	.250	3	0	2	0.00	12	.833	.	.	.	.	8.5	5.87
13	Baton Rouge W (3–0 sets)	3	3	1.00	2	6	.167	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	4.5	4.23
15	Tucson L (2–3 sets)	5	8	1.60	5	19	.158	12	2	2	0.40	21	.905	.	.	.	.	13.5	7.78
17	Burlington W (3–1 sets)	4	9	2.25	4	16	.313	5	1	0	0.25	12	1.000	.	.	.	.	10.0	4.69
18	San Jose L (2–3 sets)	5	6	1.20	7	17	-.059	8	2	5	0.40	16	.688	.	.	.	.	10.0	5.30
21	Quincy W (3–1 sets)	4	15	3.75	0	17	.882	12	3	4	0.75	23	.826	.	.	.	.	21.5	10.00
22	Burlington L (0–3 sets)	3	10	3.33	2	15	.533	3	0	1	0.00	11	.909	.	.	.	.	10.5	6.27
Total		49	86	1.76	47	180	.217	57	12	21	0.24	130	.838	.	.	.	.	121.0	5.67

Match Statistics - DEFENSE (Season 11)

Match		Sets	Block					Dig		Receive
m	opponent/sets	sp	s	a	t	be	blk/s	d	d/s	3	rt	rcv	e	pct	pts	rating
1	Teutopolis W (3–2 sets)	5	0	2	2	0	0.40	2	0.40	.	.	.	.	.	14.0	5.48
2	Kentucky L (0–3 sets)	3	1	2	3	1	1.00	1	0.33	.	.	.	.	.	3.0	4.01
5	Starkville W (3–1 sets)	4	1	2	3	2	0.75	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	9.0	4.67
6	Portland L (2–3 sets)	5	0	6	6	1	1.20	1	0.20	.	.	.	.	.	12.0	6.74
7	Nashville L (0–3 sets)	3	0	1	1	0	0.33	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	4.5	3.01
9	Burlington W (3–2 sets)	5	0	7	7	0	1.40	1	0.20	.	.	.	.	.	8.5	5.87
13	Baton Rouge W (3–0 sets)	3	0	3	3	0	1.00	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	4.5	4.23
15	Tucson L (2–3 sets)	5	0	7	7	0	1.40	1	0.20	.	.	.	.	.	13.5	7.78
17	Burlington W (3–1 sets)	4	.	.	.	.	.	3	0.75	.	.	.	.	.	10.0	4.69
18	San Jose L (2–3 sets)	5	0	4	4	0	0.80	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	10.0	5.30
21	Quincy W (3–1 sets)	4	0	7	7	0	1.75	3	0.75	.	.	.	.	.	21.5	10.00
22	Burlington L (0–3 sets)	3	0	1	1	0	0.33	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	10.5	6.27
Total		49	2	42	44	4	0.90	12	0.24	.	.	.	.	.	121.0	5.67