Players

Match		Sets	Attack					Serve						Set
m	opponent/sets	sp	k	k/s	e	ta	pct	pts	sa	se	sa/s	ta	pct	a	a/s	ta	pct	pts	rating
3	Teutopolis L (0–3 sets)	3	1	0.33	0	2	.500	1	0	0	0.00	6	1.000	23	7.67	62	.371	3.5	3.92
6	Alton W (3–1 sets)	4	0	0.00	1	1	-1.000	6	2	4	0.50	12	.667	40	10.00	84	.476	3.0	4.96
7	Mat-Su W (3–0 sets)	3	0	0.00	0	2	.000	9	0	1	0.00	15	.933	35	11.67	56	.625	1.0	8.00
11	Carlsbad W (3–2 sets)	5	5	1.00	0	11	.455	9	1	2	0.20	19	.895	57	11.40	98	.582	7.0	7.45
12	Ames L (1–3 sets)	4	1	0.25	0	2	.500	2	0	2	0.00	10	.800	44	11.00	94	.468	2.0	5.36
14	Albuquerque W (3–0 sets)	3	3	1.00	0	7	.429	1	0	4	0.00	8	.500	46	15.33	67	.687	5.5	9.10
15	New Orleans L (0–3 sets)	3	0	0.00	1	3	-.333	2	0	0	0.00	10	1.000	38	12.67	68	.559	1.0	7.91
17	Portland W (3–2 sets)	5	2	0.40	1	7	.143	7	2	2	0.40	17	.882	62	12.40	110	.564	5.5	8.30
19	San Jose W (3–0 sets)	3	0	0.00	0	3	.000	4	2	1	0.67	10	.900	43	14.33	67	.642	3.5	9.26
21	Cincinnati W (3–0 sets)	3	1	0.33	0	4	.250	3	1	1	0.33	9	.889	38	12.67	66	.576	2.0	7.42
23	Denali L (1–3 sets)	4	3	0.75	0	6	.500	5	3	1	0.75	16	.938	36	9.00	75	.480	7.5	5.08
30	Teutopolis L (0–3 sets)	3	2	0.67	3	7	-.143	2	0	3	0.00	11	.727	36	12.00	62	.581	2.5	6.82
34	Tucson L (1–3 sets)	4	1	0.25	0	4	.250	5	1	4	0.25	14	.714	41	10.25	86	.477	2.0	4.68
39	San Jose L (0–3 sets)	3	2	0.67	0	3	.667	1	0	2	0.00	10	.800	38	12.67	64	.594	2.5	7.22
40	Alton L (2–3 sets)	5	1	0.20	1	5	.000	7	1	1	0.20	20	.950	58	11.60	97	.598	4.0	7.31
Total		55	22	0.40	7	67	.224	64	13	28	0.24	187	.850	635	11.55	1156	.549	52.5	6.85

Match		Sets	Block					Dig		Receive
m	opponent/sets	sp	s	a	t	be	blk/s	d	d/s	3	rt	rcv	e	pct	pts	rating
3	Teutopolis L (0–3 sets)	3	1	3	4	0	1.33	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	3.5	3.92
6	Alton W (3–1 sets)	4	0	2	2	0	0.50	3	0.75	.	.	.	.	.	3.0	4.96
7	Mat-Su W (3–0 sets)	3	0	2	2	0	0.67	9	3.00	.	.	.	.	.	1.0	8.00
11	Carlsbad W (3–2 sets)	5	0	2	2	0	0.40	6	1.20	.	.	.	.	.	7.0	7.45
12	Ames L (1–3 sets)	4	0	2	2	0	0.50	4	1.00	.	.	.	.	.	2.0	5.36
14	Albuquerque W (3–0 sets)	3	1	3	4	1	1.33	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	5.5	9.10
15	New Orleans L (0–3 sets)	3	0	2	2	0	0.67	5	1.67	.	.	.	.	.	1.0	7.91
17	Portland W (3–2 sets)	5	0	3	3	1	0.60	6	1.20	.	.	.	.	.	5.5	8.30
19	San Jose W (3–0 sets)	3	0	3	3	1	1.00	4	1.33	.	.	.	.	.	3.5	9.26
21	Cincinnati W (3–0 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	4	1.33	.	.	.	.	.	2.0	7.42
23	Denali L (1–3 sets)	4	1	1	2	0	0.50	4	1.00	.	.	.	.	.	7.5	5.08
30	Teutopolis L (0–3 sets)	3	0	1	1	0	0.33	2	0.67	.	.	.	.	.	2.5	6.82
34	Tucson L (1–3 sets)	4	.	.	.	.	.	1	0.25	.	.	.	.	.	2.0	4.68
39	San Jose L (0–3 sets)	3	0	1	1	0	0.33	1	0.33	.	.	.	.	.	2.5	7.22
40	Alton L (2–3 sets)	5	0	4	4	0	0.80	5	1.00	.	.	.	.	.	4.0	7.31
Total		55	3	29	32	3	0.58	54	0.98	.	.	.	.	.	52.5	6.85