Players

Ford Prefect 5 Middle Blocker (MB)
Player Skills
SERVING	RECEIVING	BLOCKING	ATTACKING	DEFENSE	SETTING
15	-	15	16	10	-

Match		Sets	Attack					Serve						Set
m	opponent/sets	sp	k	k/s	e	ta	pct	pts	sa	se	sa/s	ta	pct	a	a/s	ta	pct	pts	rating
1	Schenectady W (3–2 sets)	5	14	2.80	2	20	.600	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	14.5	4.46
3	Arlington W (3–0 sets)	3	7	2.33	1	11	.545	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	9.5	7.05
4	Spokane W (3–1 sets)	4	6	1.50	2	10	.400	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	8.5	5.76
6	Tucson W (3–2 sets)	5	9	1.80	4	17	.294	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	11.5	5.63
7	Cincinnati L (2–3 sets)	5	10	2.00	4	17	.353	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	12.5	5.50
9	Teutopolis W (3–1 sets)	4	7	1.75	0	8	.875	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	10.0	6.11
11	Sheboygan W (3–2 sets)	5	8	1.60	4	15	.267	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	10.5	4.80
12	Kentucky W (3–0 sets)	3	11	3.67	4	16	.438	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	12.0	6.51
13	Spokane W (3–0 sets)	3	9	3.00	1	11	.727	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	10.0	6.16
16	Teutopolis W (3–0 sets)	3	5	1.67	1	7	.571	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	5.5	3.36
19	Spokane W (3–2 sets)	5	6	1.20	4	14	.143	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	7.5	2.66
20	Arlington W (3–1 sets)	4	11	2.75	1	14	.714	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	12.5	5.89
23	Cincinnati L (1–3 sets)	4	4	1.00	1	8	.375	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	4.5	1.83
24	Columbia L (0–3 sets)	3	4	1.33	1	7	.429	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	5.0	3.97
25	Baton Rouge W (3–1 sets)	4	7	1.75	3	12	.333	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	8.5	4.67
31	Quincy W (3–0 sets)	3	5	1.67	1	8	.500	7	2	2	0.67	14	.857	.	.	.	.	8.0	5.88
32	Mat-Su L (2–3 sets)	5	6	1.20	2	13	.308	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	7.0	2.66
34	Mendon W (3–0 sets)	3	10	3.33	2	17	.471	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	10.5	5.37
36	Spokane W (3–2 sets)	5	9	1.80	5	17	.235	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	10.5	4.19
39	Manitowoc W (3–0 sets)	3	6	2.00	3	10	.300	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	6.5	4.06
41	Kentucky W (3–1 sets)	4	3	0.75	5	13	-.154	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	5.5	4.36
44	Alton W (3–1 sets)	4	10	2.50	3	15	.467	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	11.5	5.55
46	Starkville L (0–3 sets)	3	5	1.67	2	9	.333	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	5.0	2.40
Total		90	172	1.91	56	289	.401	7	2	2	0.02	14	.857	.	.	.	.	207.0	4.73

Match		Sets	Block					Dig		Receive
m	opponent/sets	sp	s	a	t	be	blk/s	d	d/s	3	rt	rcv	e	pct	pts	rating
1	Schenectady W (3–2 sets)	5	0	1	1	1	0.20	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	14.5	4.46
3	Arlington W (3–0 sets)	3	1	3	4	1	1.33	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	9.5	7.05
4	Spokane W (3–1 sets)	4	0	5	5	0	1.25	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	8.5	5.76
6	Tucson W (3–2 sets)	5	0	5	5	0	1.00	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	11.5	5.63
7	Cincinnati L (2–3 sets)	5	1	3	4	0	0.80	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	12.5	5.50
9	Teutopolis W (3–1 sets)	4	1	4	5	0	1.25	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	10.0	6.11
11	Sheboygan W (3–2 sets)	5	1	3	4	1	0.80	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	10.5	4.80
12	Kentucky W (3–0 sets)	3	0	2	2	1	0.67	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	12.0	6.51
13	Spokane W (3–0 sets)	3	0	2	2	1	0.67	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	10.0	6.16
16	Teutopolis W (3–0 sets)	3	0	1	1	1	0.33	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	5.5	3.36
19	Spokane W (3–2 sets)	5	1	1	2	1	0.40	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	7.5	2.66
20	Arlington W (3–1 sets)	4	0	3	3	0	0.75	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	12.5	5.89
23	Cincinnati L (1–3 sets)	4	0	1	1	0	0.25	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	4.5	1.83
24	Columbia L (0–3 sets)	3	0	2	2	1	0.67	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	5.0	3.97
25	Baton Rouge W (3–1 sets)	4	0	3	3	0	0.75	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	8.5	4.67
31	Quincy W (3–0 sets)	3	0	2	2	2	0.67	1	0.33	.	.	.	.	.	8.0	5.88
32	Mat-Su L (2–3 sets)	5	0	2	2	0	0.40	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	7.0	2.66
34	Mendon W (3–0 sets)	3	0	1	1	0	0.33	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	10.5	5.37
36	Spokane W (3–2 sets)	5	0	3	3	0	0.60	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	10.5	4.19
39	Manitowoc W (3–0 sets)	3	0	1	1	0	0.33	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	6.5	4.06
41	Kentucky W (3–1 sets)	4	0	5	5	0	1.25	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	5.5	4.36
44	Alton W (3–1 sets)	4	0	3	3	0	0.75	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	11.5	5.55
46	Starkville L (0–3 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	5.0	2.40
Total		90	5	56	61	11	0.68	1	0.01	.	.	.	.	.	207.0	4.73