Players

Ford Prefect 5 Middle Blocker (MB)
Player Skills
SERVING	RECEIVING	BLOCKING	ATTACKING	DEFENSE	SETTING
15	-	15	16	10	-

Match		Sets	Attack					Serve						Set
m	opponent/sets	sp	k	k/s	e	ta	pct	pts	sa	se	sa/s	ta	pct	a	a/s	ta	pct	pts	rating
1	Schenectady W (3–0 sets)	3	9	3.00	1	12	.667	4	2	0	0.67	9	1.000	.	.	.	.	14.0	9.97
3	Ames W (3–0 sets)	3	7	2.33	4	14	.214	3	0	3	0.00	8	.625	.	.	.	.	10.0	9.16
4	Mendon L (2–3 sets)	5	8	1.60	0	13	.615	2	0	3	0.00	11	.727	.	.	.	.	9.0	3.80
6	Albuquerque W (3–1 sets)	4	10	2.50	6	16	.250	13	5	2	1.25	21	.905	.	.	.	.	17.0	8.21
7	Sheboygan L (2–3 sets)	5	14	2.80	5	20	.450	4	1	4	0.20	13	.692	.	.	.	.	16.0	5.77
8	Spokane W (3–0 sets)	3	12	4.00	3	16	.563	6	1	3	0.33	14	.786	.	.	.	.	14.0	8.07
10	Schenectady W (3–1 sets)	4	7	1.75	4	11	.273	9	2	2	0.50	16	.875	.	.	.	.	11.0	7.18
11	Manitowoc W (3–0 sets)	3	10	3.33	1	13	.692	2	1	0	0.33	9	1.000	.	.	.	.	13.0	7.89
13	Mendon W (3–1 sets)	4	7	1.75	2	11	.455	12	3	0	0.75	21	1.000	.	.	.	.	12.0	7.32
15	Quincy W (3–2 sets)	5	14	2.80	4	21	.476	13	3	1	0.60	24	.958	.	.	.	.	20.0	8.56
18	Pekin L (0–3 sets)	3	5	1.67	3	11	.182	4	1	3	0.33	11	.727	.	.	.	.	7.5	5.37
20	San Jose L (1–3 sets)	4	14	3.50	3	18	.611	3	1	3	0.25	12	.750	.	.	.	.	17.5	8.61
21	San Jose W (3–2 sets)	5	13	2.60	7	23	.261	6	1	2	0.20	17	.882	.	.	.	.	15.5	6.36
23	Mendon W (3–1 sets)	4	12	3.00	3	16	.563	9	3	2	0.75	17	.882	.	.	.	.	15.5	6.15
25	Baton Rouge W (3–0 sets)	3	10	3.33	2	12	.667	0	0	0	0.00	6	1.000	.	.	.	.	11.0	6.33
26	Mat-Su W (3–1 sets)	4	10	2.50	5	19	.263	3	0	1	0.00	11	.909	.	.	.	.	11.5	5.81
29	Sheboygan L (1–3 sets)	4	5	1.25	3	11	.182	2	0	1	0.00	9	.889	.	.	.	.	7.5	5.19
32	Alton L (0–3 sets)	3	9	3.00	3	12	.500	3	1	1	0.33	9	.889	.	.	.	.	11.5	8.02
Total		69	176	2.55	59	269	.435	98	25	31	0.36	238	.870	.	.	.	.	233.5	7.10

Match		Sets	Block					Dig		Receive
m	opponent/sets	sp	s	a	t	be	blk/s	d	d/s	3	rt	rcv	e	pct	pts	rating
1	Schenectady W (3–0 sets)	3	0	6	6	0	2.00	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	14.0	9.97
3	Ames W (3–0 sets)	3	0	6	6	0	2.00	1	0.33	.	.	.	.	.	10.0	9.16
4	Mendon L (2–3 sets)	5	0	2	2	0	0.40	2	0.40	.	.	.	.	.	9.0	3.80
6	Albuquerque W (3–1 sets)	4	0	4	4	1	1.00	1	0.25	.	.	.	.	.	17.0	8.21
7	Sheboygan L (2–3 sets)	5	0	2	2	1	0.40	1	0.20	.	.	.	.	.	16.0	5.77
8	Spokane W (3–0 sets)	3	0	2	2	0	0.67	1	0.33	.	.	.	.	.	14.0	8.07
10	Schenectady W (3–1 sets)	4	0	4	4	0	1.00	1	0.25	.	.	.	.	.	11.0	7.18
11	Manitowoc W (3–0 sets)	3	1	2	3	1	1.00	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	13.0	7.89
13	Mendon W (3–1 sets)	4	0	4	4	0	1.00	1	0.25	.	.	.	.	.	12.0	7.32
15	Quincy W (3–2 sets)	5	1	4	5	0	1.00	5	1.00	.	.	.	.	.	20.0	8.56
18	Pekin L (0–3 sets)	3	1	1	2	0	0.67	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	7.5	5.37
20	San Jose L (1–3 sets)	4	0	5	5	0	1.25	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	17.5	8.61
21	San Jose W (3–2 sets)	5	0	3	3	1	0.60	2	0.40	.	.	.	.	.	15.5	6.36
23	Mendon W (3–1 sets)	4	0	1	1	2	0.25	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	15.5	6.15
25	Baton Rouge W (3–0 sets)	3	0	2	2	1	0.67	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	11.0	6.33
26	Mat-Su W (3–1 sets)	4	1	1	2	2	0.50	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	11.5	5.81
29	Sheboygan L (1–3 sets)	4	1	3	4	0	1.00	2	0.50	.	.	.	.	.	7.5	5.19
32	Alton L (0–3 sets)	3	0	3	3	0	1.00	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	11.5	8.02
Total		69	5	55	60	9	0.87	17	0.25	.	.	.	.	.	233.5	7.10