Players

Lucas Worsley 5 Outside Hitter (OH)
Player Skills
SERVING	RECEIVING	BLOCKING	ATTACKING	DEFENSE	SETTING
15	15	16	13	13	10

Match		Sets	Attack					Serve						Set
m	opponent/sets	sp	k	k/s	e	ta	pct	pts	sa	se	sa/s	ta	pct	a	a/s	ta	pct	pts	rating
1	Schenectady W (3–2 sets)	5	6	1.20	7	31	-.032	5	1	1	0.20	13	.923	0	0.00	1	.000	8.5	3.17
2	Cincinnati L (0–3 sets)	3	2	0.67	8	23	-.261	1	0	2	0.00	7	.714	.	.	.	.	3.0	3.45
5	Manitowoc W (3–2 sets)	5	7	1.40	12	36	-.139	4	1	2	0.20	14	.857	.	.	.	.	10.0	4.16
9	Antioch L (0–3 sets)	3	2	0.67	1	15	.067	5	1	2	0.33	11	.818	0	0.00	1	.000	3.0	3.77
12	Ames L (0–3 sets)	3	2	0.67	5	17	-.176	2	0	0	0.00	8	1.000	1	0.33	1	1.000	2.5	3.54
15	Columbia W (3–2 sets)	5	5	1.00	7	23	-.087	11	3	2	0.60	22	.909	0	0.00	2	.000	9.0	3.03
17	Nashville W (3–0 sets)	3	5	1.67	3	14	.143	3	1	2	0.33	9	.778	.	.	.	.	7.0	3.74
18	Dallas L (0–3 sets)	3	8	2.67	8	28	.000	2	0	1	0.00	8	.875	.	.	.	.	11.0	4.82
25	Antioch W (3–2 sets)	5	7	1.40	6	24	.042	8	2	2	0.40	17	.882	0	0.00	2	.000	10.5	3.76
26	Denali L (1–3 sets)	4	10	2.50	3	20	.350	3	0	4	0.00	11	.636	.	.	.	.	12.0	4.37
29	Spokane W (3–2 sets)	5	7	1.40	2	19	.263	7	1	1	0.20	15	.933	.	.	.	.	9.0	3.55
34	Burlington L (0–3 sets)	3	1	0.33	3	8	-.250	2	0	0	0.00	7	1.000	.	.	.	.	2.0	3.80
39	Manitowoc L (2–3 sets)	5	7	1.40	5	21	.095	5	1	2	0.20	14	.857	.	.	.	.	8.0	3.17
40	Tucson W (3–0 sets)	3	6	2.00	0	13	.462	3	0	2	0.00	10	.800	.	.	.	.	7.0	2.95
Total		55	75	1.36	70	292	.017	61	11	23	0.20	166	.861	1	0.02	7	.143	102.5	3.66

Match		Sets	Block					Dig		Receive
m	opponent/sets	sp	s	a	t	be	blk/s	d	d/s	3	rt	rcv	e	pct	pts	rating
1	Schenectady W (3–2 sets)	5	1	1	2	0	0.40	4	0.80	18	2.05	39	6	.846	8.5	3.17
2	Cincinnati L (0–3 sets)	3	1	0	1	1	0.33	1	0.33	9	2.28	18	1	.944	3.0	3.45
5	Manitowoc W (3–2 sets)	5	0	4	4	0	0.80	4	0.80	23	2.33	40	3	.925	10.0	4.16
9	Antioch L (0–3 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	8	2.67	18	2.03	35	4	.886	3.0	3.77
12	Ames L (0–3 sets)	3	0	1	1	0	0.33	3	1.00	13	2.20	25	3	.880	2.5	3.54
15	Columbia W (3–2 sets)	5	0	2	2	0	0.40	9	1.80	13	1.67	39	8	.795	9.0	3.03
17	Nashville W (3–0 sets)	3	0	2	2	1	0.67	4	1.33	9	2.00	22	3	.864	7.0	3.74
18	Dallas L (0–3 sets)	3	0	6	6	0	2.00	3	1.00	7	1.67	27	3	.889	11.0	4.82
25	Antioch W (3–2 sets)	5	0	3	3	0	0.60	5	1.00	8	2.00	30	1	.967	10.5	3.76
26	Denali L (1–3 sets)	4	1	2	3	0	0.75	4	1.00	11	1.81	32	4	.875	12.0	4.37
29	Spokane W (3–2 sets)	5	0	2	2	0	0.40	2	0.40	15	2.11	36	3	.917	9.0	3.55
34	Burlington L (0–3 sets)	3	0	2	2	0	0.67	2	0.67	13	2.23	22	3	.864	2.0	3.80
39	Manitowoc L (2–3 sets)	5	.	.	.	.	.	5	1.00	14	2.15	27	3	.889	8.0	3.17
40	Tucson W (3–0 sets)	3	0	2	2	0	0.67	1	0.33	7	1.76	21	4	.810	7.0	2.95
Total		55	3	27	30	3	0.55	55	1.00	178	2.01	413	49	.881	102.5	3.66