Players

Lucas Worsley 5 Outside Hitter (OH)
Player Skills
SERVING	RECEIVING	BLOCKING	ATTACKING	DEFENSE	SETTING
15	15	16	13	13	10

Season 13 Totals
KILLS	ATK PCT	ACES	DIGS	BLOCKS
211 76th	.323 183rd	23 87th	61 183rd	64 66th

Match Statistics - OFFENSE (Season 13)

Match		Sets	Attack					Serve						Set
m	opponent/sets	sp	k	k/s	e	ta	pct	pts	sa	se	sa/s	ta	pct	a	a/s	ta	pct	pts	rating
4	Cincinnati L (2–3 sets)	5	11	2.20	3	20	.400	6	2	2	0.40	17	.882	1	0.20	1	1.000	14.0	4.83
6	San Jose L (0–3 sets)	3	10	3.33	8	26	.077	3	2	0	0.67	9	1.000	0	0.00	1	.000	13.0	6.73
7	Burlington W (3–2 sets)	5	7	1.40	3	17	.235	10	1	2	0.20	19	.895	.	.	.	.	9.0	4.03
8	Schenectady W (3–0 sets)	3	5	1.67	1	10	.400	6	2	1	0.67	11	.909	.	.	.	.	10.0	4.83
10	Spokane L (1–3 sets)	4	7	1.75	12	27	-.185	1	0	1	0.00	12	.917	.	.	.	.	7.5	3.91
12	San Jose L (1–3 sets)	4	7	1.75	3	21	.190	7	0	4	0.00	15	.733	1	0.25	2	.500	10.5	5.32
13	Cincinnati W (3–1 sets)	4	17	4.25	1	23	.696	9	3	2	0.75	18	.889	.	.	.	.	21.0	8.16
14	Manitowoc W (3–2 sets)	5	19	3.80	7	34	.353	6	0	2	0.00	16	.875	.	.	.	.	20.5	7.56
17	Starkville L (2–3 sets)	5	18	3.60	4	30	.467	8	2	5	0.40	21	.762	0	0.00	1	.000	20.5	7.23
19	Manitowoc W (3–1 sets)	4	12	3.00	3	19	.474	1	0	2	0.00	10	.800	.	.	.	.	15.5	5.96
22	Starkville W (3–0 sets)	3	6	2.00	4	16	.125	12	3	1	1.00	18	.944	.	.	.	.	9.5	3.46
23	Cincinnati W (3–1 sets)	4	12	3.00	3	21	.429	5	0	3	0.00	14	.786	0	0.00	1	.000	13.0	5.95
26	Carlsbad W (3–2 sets)	5	9	1.80	5	25	.160	8	1	3	0.20	21	.857	.	.	.	.	12.5	5.64
27	Burlington W (3–2 sets)	5	17	3.40	2	28	.536	6	1	1	0.20	17	.941	0	0.00	1	.000	21.0	6.16
29	Burlington W (3–1 sets)	4	7	1.75	2	15	.333	6	1	1	0.25	13	.923	.	.	.	.	10.0	4.53
30	Ames W (3–0 sets)	3	7	2.33	3	14	.286	5	1	2	0.33	11	.818	.	.	.	.	9.5	6.46
32	Tucson W (3–1 sets)	4	12	3.00	5	19	.368	9	2	0	0.50	21	1.000	.	.	.	.	14.5	6.20
35	Portland W (3–0 sets)	3	8	2.67	3	16	.313	9	2	2	0.67	15	.867	.	.	.	.	11.5	6.14
37	Alton L (0–3 sets)	3	9	3.00	2	14	.500	1	0	3	0.00	10	.700	1	0.33	1	1.000	10.5	4.69
40	Pekin W (3–0 sets)	3	11	3.67	3	20	.400	4	0	3	0.00	11	.727	.	.	.	.	13.0	6.09
Total		79	211	2.67	77	415	.323	122	23	40	0.29	299	.866	3	0.04	8	.375	266.5	5.69

Match Statistics - DEFENSE (Season 13)

Match		Sets	Block					Dig		Receive
m	opponent/sets	sp	s	a	t	be	blk/s	d	d/s	3	rt	rcv	e	pct	pts	rating
4	Cincinnati L (2–3 sets)	5	0	2	2	0	0.40	5	1.00	21	2.26	39	3	.923	14.0	4.83
6	San Jose L (0–3 sets)	3	0	2	2	0	0.67	1	0.33	4	2.22	9	1	.889	13.0	6.73
7	Burlington W (3–2 sets)	5	0	2	2	0	0.40	3	0.60	17	2.16	31	5	.839	9.0	4.03
8	Schenectady W (3–0 sets)	3	0	6	6	0	2.00	1	0.33	9	2.24	17	2	.882	10.0	4.83
10	Spokane L (1–3 sets)	4	0	1	1	0	0.25	5	1.25	20	2.41	32	1	.969	7.5	3.91
12	San Jose L (1–3 sets)	4	0	7	7	0	1.75	5	1.25	17	2.38	32	1	.969	10.5	5.32
13	Cincinnati W (3–1 sets)	4	0	2	2	1	0.50	3	0.75	16	2.29	31	3	.903	21.0	8.16
14	Manitowoc W (3–2 sets)	5	0	3	3	1	0.60	3	0.60	13	2.27	30	2	.933	20.5	7.56
17	Starkville L (2–3 sets)	5	0	1	1	0	0.20	5	1.00	16	2.26	27	3	.889	20.5	7.23
19	Manitowoc W (3–1 sets)	4	0	7	7	0	1.75	3	0.75	11	2.04	23	2	.913	15.5	5.96
22	Starkville W (3–0 sets)	3	0	1	1	0	0.33	1	0.33	6	1.74	23	2	.913	9.5	3.46
23	Cincinnati W (3–1 sets)	4	0	2	2	0	0.50	2	0.50	14	2.12	26	3	.885	13.0	5.95
26	Carlsbad W (3–2 sets)	5	1	3	4	0	0.80	6	1.20	16	2.56	27	0	1.000	12.5	5.64
27	Burlington W (3–2 sets)	5	0	6	6	0	1.20	1	0.20	15	1.95	37	4	.892	21.0	6.16
29	Burlington W (3–1 sets)	4	0	4	4	0	1.00	2	0.50	8	2.29	14	1	.929	10.0	4.53
30	Ames W (3–0 sets)	3	0	3	3	1	1.00	2	0.67	13	2.62	21	0	1.000	9.5	6.46
32	Tucson W (3–1 sets)	4	0	1	1	1	0.25	6	1.50	15	2.03	31	6	.806	14.5	6.20
35	Portland W (3–0 sets)	3	0	3	3	1	1.00	3	1.00	7	1.94	17	1	.941	11.5	6.14
37	Alton L (0–3 sets)	3	0	3	3	0	1.00	2	0.67	13	1.70	30	8	.733	10.5	4.69
40	Pekin W (3–0 sets)	3	0	4	4	1	1.33	2	0.67	10	1.65	26	7	.731	13.0	6.09
Total		79	1	63	64	6	0.81	61	0.77	261	2.15	523	55	.895	266.5	5.69