Players

Match		Sets	Attack					Serve						Set
m	opponent/sets	sp	k	k/s	e	ta	pct	pts	sa	se	sa/s	ta	pct	a	a/s	ta	pct	pts	rating
4	Mat-Su L (0–3 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	3	2	3	0.67	9	.667	1	0.33	3	.333	2.0	3.65
7	San Jose L (1–3 sets)	4	.	.	.	.	.	6	0	1	0.00	13	.923	3	0.75	3	1.000	0.0	4.80
10	San Diego W (3–2 sets)	5	.	.	.	.	.	3	1	3	0.20	11	.727	3	0.60	13	.231	1.0	5.05
15	Antioch W (3–2 sets)	5	.	.	.	.	.	5	2	2	0.40	13	.846	5	1.00	7	.714	2.0	7.00
17	Dallas W (3–1 sets)	4	.	.	.	.	.	5	2	2	0.50	12	.833	5	1.25	8	.625	2.0	5.33
18	Nashville W (3–2 sets)	5	.	.	.	.	.	3	0	2	0.00	12	.833	2	0.40	6	.333	0.0	5.63
21	Mendon L (0–3 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	1	0.33	4	.250	0.0	3.85
25	Columbia W (3–0 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	5	1.67	6	.833	0.0	4.63
26	Sheboygan W (3–1 sets)	4	.	.	.	.	.	2	1	2	0.25	10	.800	3	0.75	6	.500	1.0	5.05
35	Santa Clara L (0–3 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	1	0	1	0.00	7	.857	3	1.00	7	.429	0.0	7.08
Total		39	.	.	.	.	.	28	8	16	0.21	87	.816	31	0.79	63	.492	8.0	5.21

Match		Sets	Block					Dig		Receive
m	opponent/sets	sp	s	a	t	be	blk/s	d	d/s	3	rt	rcv	e	pct	pts	rating
4	Mat-Su L (0–3 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	2	0.67	11	2.15	27	1	.963	2.0	3.65
7	San Jose L (1–3 sets)	4	.	.	.	.	.	3	0.75	23	2.37	41	2	.951	0.0	4.80
10	San Diego W (3–2 sets)	5	.	.	.	.	.	9	1.80	17	1.85	41	7	.829	1.0	5.05
15	Antioch W (3–2 sets)	5	.	.	.	.	.	11	2.20	13	2.36	25	1	.960	2.0	7.00
17	Dallas W (3–1 sets)	4	.	.	.	.	.	10	2.50	13	1.81	31	7	.774	2.0	5.33
18	Nashville W (3–2 sets)	5	.	.	.	.	.	6	1.20	19	2.40	30	3	.900	0.0	5.63
21	Mendon L (0–3 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	5	1.67	9	1.73	26	4	.846	0.0	3.85
25	Columbia W (3–0 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	4	1.33	5	2.00	13	1	.923	0.0	4.63
26	Sheboygan W (3–1 sets)	4	.	.	.	.	.	6	1.50	18	2.23	35	2	.943	1.0	5.05
35	Santa Clara L (0–3 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	9	3.00	10	2.25	20	1	.950	0.0	7.08
Total		39	.	.	.	.	.	65	1.67	138	2.12	289	29	.900	8.0	5.21