Players

Session 13 Coaches Poll deadline in 14 hours and 36 minutes

MSWL UNITED MSWL U2 TMVL
Wednesday, April 29th, 2026 - 03:23:10 AM (gmt)

TMVL Season 17 // Landing

Logo

Donate ELO Ranking Honor Roll NET Ranking Stats Leaders Teams Of The Week Wall

If you'd like to join please click this link and add your name to the waitlist.

PAC 8 Conference

SEC Conference

BIG 8 Conference

Big East Conference

Emmanuel Biscardi 5 Middle Blocker (MB)
Player Skills
SERVING	RECEIVING	BLOCKING	ATTACKING	DEFENSE	SETTING
17	-	17	16	14	-

Season 11 Totals
KILLS	ATK PCT	ACES	DIGS	BLOCKS
99 208th	.320 184th	9 256th	15 377th	47 146th

Career Honors

S131st All-PAC-8

S142nd All-TMVL1st All-PAC-8

Match Statistics - OFFENSE (Season 11)

Match		Sets	Attack					Serve						Set
m	opponent/sets	sp	k	k/s	e	ta	pct	pts	sa	se	sa/s	ta	pct	a	a/s	ta	pct	pts	rating
1	Tucson W (3–0 sets)	3	3	1.00	3	8	.000	7	1	0	0.33	12	1.000	.	.	.	.	6.0	6.57
2	Mat-Su W (3–1 sets)	4	6	1.50	3	10	.300	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	9.0	6.48
4	Santa Clara L (1–3 sets)	4	4	1.00	1	13	.231	3	1	1	0.25	11	.909	.	.	.	.	5.5	2.70
8	San Diego L (0–3 sets)	3	1	0.33	2	5	-.200	3	0	0	0.00	7	1.000	.	.	.	.	1.5	3.05
10	Tucson W (3–0 sets)	3	5	1.67	0	6	.833	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	5.0	2.40
12	Manitowoc W (3–2 sets)	5	6	1.20	5	13	.077	5	2	6	0.40	16	.625	.	.	.	.	10.5	5.62
13	Santa Clara W (3–0 sets)	3	6	2.00	2	13	.308	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	8.5	7.42
14	Carlsbad L (0–3 sets)	3	9	3.00	3	15	.400	0	0	0	0.00	7	1.000	.	.	.	.	11.0	7.84
17	Pekin L (1–3 sets)	4	4	1.00	3	7	.143	5	0	1	0.00	13	.923	.	.	.	.	7.5	6.96
18	New Orleans W (3–2 sets)	5	10	2.00	4	16	.375	8	1	0	0.20	16	1.000	.	.	.	.	14.0	7.32
21	Cincinnati L (0–3 sets)	3	4	1.33	3	10	.100	4	3	2	1.00	11	.818	.	.	.	.	7.0	3.23
25	Quincy W (3–0 sets)	3	12	4.00	1	16	.688	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	12.5	5.64
27	Tucson W (3–0 sets)	3	6	2.00	2	8	.500	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	7.5	5.98
31	Kentucky L (2–3 sets)	5	12	2.40	5	18	.389	5	1	0	0.20	16	1.000	.	.	.	.	14.0	5.69
32	Burlington L (2–3 sets)	5	11	2.20	5	20	.300	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	12.5	4.71
Total		56	99	1.77	42	178	.320	40	9	10	0.16	109	.908	.	.	.	.	132.0	5.44

Match Statistics - DEFENSE (Season 11)

Match		Sets	Block					Dig		Receive
m	opponent/sets	sp	s	a	t	be	blk/s	d	d/s	3	rt	rcv	e	pct	pts	rating
1	Tucson W (3–0 sets)	3	0	4	4	0	1.33	2	0.67	.	.	.	.	.	6.0	6.57
2	Mat-Su W (3–1 sets)	4	0	6	6	0	1.50	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	9.0	6.48
4	Santa Clara L (1–3 sets)	4	0	1	1	0	0.25	1	0.25	.	.	.	.	.	5.5	2.70
8	San Diego L (0–3 sets)	3	0	1	1	1	0.33	2	0.67	.	.	.	.	.	1.5	3.05
10	Tucson W (3–0 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	5.0	2.40
12	Manitowoc W (3–2 sets)	5	0	5	5	1	1.00	2	0.40	.	.	.	.	.	10.5	5.62
13	Santa Clara W (3–0 sets)	3	0	5	5	0	1.67	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	8.5	7.42
14	Carlsbad L (0–3 sets)	3	0	4	4	0	1.33	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	11.0	7.84
17	Pekin L (1–3 sets)	4	0	7	7	0	1.75	1	0.25	.	.	.	.	.	7.5	6.96
18	New Orleans W (3–2 sets)	5	1	4	5	0	1.00	2	0.40	.	.	.	.	.	14.0	7.32
21	Cincinnati L (0–3 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	1	0.33	.	.	.	.	.	7.0	3.23
25	Quincy W (3–0 sets)	3	0	1	1	1	0.33	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	12.5	5.64
27	Tucson W (3–0 sets)	3	0	3	3	0	1.00	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	7.5	5.98
31	Kentucky L (2–3 sets)	5	0	2	2	0	0.40	4	0.80	.	.	.	.	.	14.0	5.69
32	Burlington L (2–3 sets)	5	0	3	3	1	0.60	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	12.5	4.71
Total		56	1	46	47	5	0.84	15	0.27	.	.	.	.	.	132.0	5.44