Players

Match		Sets	Attack					Serve						Set
m	opponent/sets	sp	k	k/s	e	ta	pct	pts	sa	se	sa/s	ta	pct	a	a/s	ta	pct	pts	rating
1	Mendon W (3–1 sets)	4	.	.	.	.	.	3	2	1	0.50	11	.909	4	1.00	8	.500	2.0	6.55
2	Spokane L (2–3 sets)	5	.	.	.	.	.	2	0	0	0.00	11	1.000	3	0.60	6	.500	0.0	3.65
4	Schenectady W (3–0 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	2	0.67	3	.667	0.0	5.53
5	Sheboygan L (0–3 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	2	0.67	5	.400	0.0	6.20
7	Cincinnati W (3–0 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	3	1.00	5	.600	0.0	5.18
11	Spokane W (3–0 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	4	1.33	5	.800	0.0	6.61
12	Antioch L (0–3 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	2	0.67	4	.500	0.0	6.88
13	Schenectady W (3–1 sets)	4	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	8	2.00	11	.727	0.0	4.21
19	Mendon L (2–3 sets)	5	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	7	1.40	9	.778	0.0	5.05
22	Tucson W (3–0 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	3	1.00	5	.600	0.0	6.30
32	Burlington W (3–0 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	4	1.33	5	.800	0.0	3.68
35	Antioch W (3–2 sets)	5	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	9	1.80	11	.818	0.0	4.19
37	Sheboygan W (3–0 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	5	1.67	5	1.000	0.0	7.78
39	Sheboygan W (3–2 sets)	5	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	2	0.40	3	.667	0.0	6.10
42	Mat-Su W (3–0 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	6	2.00	6	1.000	0.0	6.01
45	San Jose L (0–3 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	0	0.00	3	.000	0.0	3.25
47	Pekin L (2–3 sets)	5	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	6	1.20	7	.857	0.0	3.65
Total		63	.	.	.	.	.	5	2	1	0.03	22	.955	70	1.11	101	.693	2.0	5.34

Match		Sets	Block					Dig		Receive
m	opponent/sets	sp	s	a	t	be	blk/s	d	d/s	3	rt	rcv	e	pct	pts	rating
1	Mendon W (3–1 sets)	4	.	.	.	.	.	10	2.50	7	2.29	14	0	1.000	2.0	6.55
2	Spokane L (2–3 sets)	5	.	.	.	.	.	4	0.80	9	2.13	24	0	1.000	0.0	3.65
4	Schenectady W (3–0 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	8	2.67	6	1.93	14	2	.857	0.0	5.53
5	Sheboygan L (0–3 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	6	2.00	12	2.32	22	1	.955	0.0	6.20
7	Cincinnati W (3–0 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	9	3.00	9	1.57	30	6	.800	0.0	5.18
11	Spokane W (3–0 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	8	2.67	6	2.23	13	0	1.000	0.0	6.61
12	Antioch L (0–3 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	6	2.00	17	2.41	29	1	.966	0.0	6.88
13	Schenectady W (3–1 sets)	4	.	.	.	.	.	4	1.00	14	2.23	31	1	.968	0.0	4.21
19	Mendon L (2–3 sets)	5	.	.	.	.	.	7	1.40	21	2.13	38	3	.921	0.0	5.05
22	Tucson W (3–0 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	5	1.67	8	2.37	19	0	1.000	0.0	6.30
32	Burlington W (3–0 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	2	0.67	14	2.20	25	3	.880	0.0	3.68
35	Antioch W (3–2 sets)	5	.	.	.	.	.	2	0.40	23	2.31	36	4	.889	0.0	4.19
37	Sheboygan W (3–0 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	5	1.67	15	2.62	21	0	1.000	0.0	7.78
39	Sheboygan W (3–2 sets)	5	.	.	.	.	.	11	2.20	22	2.32	38	4	.895	0.0	6.10
42	Mat-Su W (3–0 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	7	2.33	16	2.28	25	3	.880	0.0	6.01
45	San Jose L (0–3 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	2	0.67	11	2.13	23	3	.870	0.0	3.25
47	Pekin L (2–3 sets)	5	.	.	.	.	.	2	0.40	21	2.17	36	5	.861	0.0	3.65
Total		63	.	.	.	.	.	98	1.56	231	2.21	438	36	.918	2.0	5.34