Players

Match		Sets	Attack					Serve						Set
m	opponent/sets	sp	k	k/s	e	ta	pct	pts	sa	se	sa/s	ta	pct	a	a/s	ta	pct	pts	rating
3	Burlington L (1–3 sets)	4	.	.	.	.	.	3	1	3	0.25	11	.727	5	1.25	12	.417	1.0	6.38
6	New Orleans W (3–2 sets)	5	.	.	.	.	.	6	0	3	0.00	14	.786	6	1.20	18	.333	0.0	8.00
9	Denali L (0–3 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	3	0	0	0.00	9	1.000	0	0.00	5	.000	0.0	6.76
12	Cincinnati L (0–3 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	2	1	0	0.33	6	1.000	1	0.33	3	.333	1.0	3.65
15	Schenectady L (0–3 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	1	0.33	6	.167	0.0	7.23
17	Carlsbad W (3–0 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	4	1.33	6	.667	0.0	5.93
21	Teutopolis L (0–3 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	0	0	1	0.00	3	.667	0	0.00	3	.000	0.0	5.05
26	Starkville L (1–3 sets)	4	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	3	0.75	3	1.000	0.0	5.80
Total		28	.	.	.	.	.	14	2	7	0.07	43	.837	20	0.71	56	.357	2.0	6.10

Match		Sets	Block					Dig		Receive
m	opponent/sets	sp	s	a	t	be	blk/s	d	d/s	3	rt	rcv	e	pct	pts	rating
3	Burlington L (1–3 sets)	4	.	.	.	.	.	11	2.75	11	2.04	26	2	.923	1.0	6.38
6	New Orleans W (3–2 sets)	5	.	.	.	.	.	17	3.40	9	2.24	21	0	1.000	0.0	8.00
9	Denali L (0–3 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	4	1.33	12	2.52	21	0	1.000	0.0	6.76
12	Cincinnati L (0–3 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	1	0.33	4	2.09	11	0	1.000	1.0	3.65
15	Schenectady L (0–3 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	7	2.33	14	2.45	22	0	1.000	0.0	7.23
17	Carlsbad W (3–0 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	4	1.33	10	2.38	16	0	1.000	0.0	5.93
21	Teutopolis L (0–3 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	5	1.67	8	2.17	18	0	1.000	0.0	5.05
26	Starkville L (1–3 sets)	4	.	.	.	.	.	9	2.25	19	2.21	34	3	.912	0.0	5.80
Total		28	.	.	.	.	.	58	2.07	87	2.26	169	5	.970	2.0	6.10