Players

Match		Sets	Attack					Serve						Set
m	opponent/sets	sp	k	k/s	e	ta	pct	pts	sa	se	sa/s	ta	pct	a	a/s	ta	pct	pts	rating
4	Columbia L (0–3 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	4	1.33	10	.400	0.0	5.48
6	Starkville W (3–0 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	3	1.00	4	.750	0.0	8.11
8	Arlington W (3–0 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	8	0	2	0.00	16	.875	3	1.00	4	.750	0.0	7.46
9	Tucson L (0–3 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	3	1	2	0.33	11	.818	3	1.00	5	.600	1.0	7.11
10	St. Charles L (1–3 sets)	4	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	2	0.50	5	.400	0.0	5.03
11	Ames W (3–2 sets)	5	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	5	1.00	8	.625	0.0	6.53
12	Santa Clara L (2–3 sets)	5	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	7	1.40	15	.467	0.0	5.50
14	Dallas L (1–3 sets)	4	.	.	.	.	.	12	3	2	0.75	22	.909	2	0.50	5	.400	3.0	6.64
15	Cincinnati W (3–0 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	5	1	2	0.33	11	.818	5	1.67	8	.625	1.0	8.17
17	San Diego L (2–3 sets)	5	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	6	1.20	8	.750	0.0	4.55
18	Mendon W (3–1 sets)	4	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	4	1.00	6	.667	0.0	7.20
21	New Orleans L (2–3 sets)	5	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	6	1.20	8	.750	0.0	6.80
22	Manitowoc W (3–1 sets)	4	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	5	1.25	14	.357	0.0	8.26
25	Tucson L (0–3 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	1	0.33	3	.333	0.0	3.40
26	Teutopolis L (0–3 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	3	1.00	6	.500	0.0	3.60
29	Quincy W (3–1 sets)	4	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	9	2.25	9	1.000	0.0	6.93
33	Antioch L (2–3 sets)	5	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	6	1.20	6	1.000	0.0	6.13
34	Arlington W (3–2 sets)	5	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	4	0.80	6	.667	0.0	3.55
35	Sheboygan L (0–3 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	5	1.67	8	.625	0.0	7.89
39	Pekin L (0–3 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	3	1.00	3	1.000	0.0	9.01
40	Baton Rouge W (3–2 sets)	5	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	8	1.60	13	.615	0.0	8.89
44	Dallas L (0–3 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	3	1.00	4	.750	0.0	4.95
45	Nashville L (0–3 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	3	1.00	6	.500	0.0	3.60
Total		88	.	.	.	.	.	28	5	8	0.06	60	.867	100	1.14	164	.610	5.0	6.30

Match		Sets	Block					Dig		Receive
m	opponent/sets	sp	s	a	t	be	blk/s	d	d/s	3	rt	rcv	e	pct	pts	rating
4	Columbia L (0–3 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	3	1.00	8	2.43	14	1	.929	0.0	5.48
6	Starkville W (3–0 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	8	2.67	10	2.47	15	0	1.000	0.0	8.11
8	Arlington W (3–0 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	5	1.67	8	2.45	11	1	.909	0.0	7.46
9	Tucson L (0–3 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	4	1.33	12	2.53	17	1	.941	1.0	7.11
10	St. Charles L (1–3 sets)	4	.	.	.	.	.	2	0.50	17	2.46	28	1	.964	0.0	5.03
11	Ames W (3–2 sets)	5	.	.	.	.	.	6	1.20	11	2.56	16	0	1.000	0.0	6.53
12	Santa Clara L (2–3 sets)	5	.	.	.	.	.	8	1.60	13	2.24	25	1	.960	0.0	5.50
14	Dallas L (1–3 sets)	4	.	.	.	.	.	5	1.25	11	2.50	18	0	1.000	3.0	6.64
15	Cincinnati W (3–0 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	9	3.00	3	2.33	6	0	1.000	1.0	8.17
17	San Diego L (2–3 sets)	5	.	.	.	.	.	6	1.20	13	2.22	23	3	.870	0.0	4.55
18	Mendon W (3–1 sets)	4	.	.	.	.	.	8	2.00	16	2.42	26	0	1.000	0.0	7.20
21	New Orleans L (2–3 sets)	5	.	.	.	.	.	7	1.40	12	2.50	20	0	1.000	0.0	6.80
22	Manitowoc W (3–1 sets)	4	.	.	.	.	.	9	2.25	11	2.63	16	0	1.000	0.0	8.26
25	Tucson L (0–3 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	3	1.00	7	2.00	15	3	.800	0.0	3.40
26	Teutopolis L (0–3 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	1	0.33	9	2.17	18	2	.889	0.0	3.60
29	Quincy W (3–1 sets)	4	.	.	.	.	.	5	1.25	15	2.62	21	0	1.000	0.0	6.93
33	Antioch L (2–3 sets)	5	.	.	.	.	.	1	0.20	14	2.82	17	0	1.000	0.0	6.13
34	Arlington W (3–2 sets)	5	.	.	.	.	.	4	0.80	7	2.21	14	1	.929	0.0	3.55
35	Sheboygan L (0–3 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	5	1.67	13	2.63	19	0	1.000	0.0	7.89
39	Pekin L (0–3 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	8	2.67	17	2.75	20	0	1.000	0.0	9.01
40	Baton Rouge W (3–2 sets)	5	.	.	.	.	.	16	3.20	16	2.42	24	1	.958	0.0	8.89
44	Dallas L (0–3 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	4	1.33	15	2.29	24	2	.917	0.0	4.95
45	Nashville L (0–3 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	2	0.67	7	2.21	14	0	1.000	0.0	3.60
Total		88	.	.	.	.	.	129	1.47	265	2.43	421	17	.960	5.0	6.30